Gonzo: Statement to the Judiciary. Get it here!!!

[133724]

See Featured Link!!!

http://www.c-span.org/

[Monkeyman]

1. 25 Pages Long but worth the read Thanks

[acmavm]

2. Don't have time to read it now but I imagine he's taking the

standard defense of 'I been framed'?

[lazyriver]

3. 5 1/2 pages vaguely addressing the USA firings and

20+ pages touting what a great job he's doing and planning to do...oh yeah, and a little September 11th statement thrown in there for good measure.

Thanks for posting the link but his statement is just what I expected - a bunch of BS.

[Monkeyman]

4. That's my take

[LiberalFighter]

5. Reviewing testimony of employees

The Committee should also know that, to ensure the independence and integrity of these investigations, and the investigations of congressional committees, I have not spoken with nor reviewed the confidential transcripts of any of the Department of Justice employees interviewed by congressional staff. I state this because, as a result, I may be somewhat limited when it comes to providing you with all of the facts that you may desire. I hope you understand that, to me, it was absolutely essential that the investigative work proceeds in a manner free of any complications by my efforts to prepare for this testimony.

That statement allows him to be "honest" even though others may have reviewed the transcripts and provide him a heads up.

[LiberalFighter]

6. Inquiry about replacing all 93 U.S. Attorneys

Shortly after the 2004 election and soon after I became Attorney General, my then-deputy-chief-of-staff Kyle Sampson told me that then-Counsel to the President Harriet Miers had inquired about replacing all 93 U.S. Attorneys. Mr. Sampson and I both agreed that replacing all 93 U.S. Attorneys would be disruptive and unwise. However, I believed it would be appropriate and a good management decision to evaluate the U.S. Attorneys and determine the districts where a change may be beneficial to the Department.

Then why was this email sent to all USA's and other Dept of Justice appointees?
Email Date: 11/4/2004

Many of you have sought guidance regarding the Administration to the President's second term. This message serves to convey the entirety of the information we have at this point, and as more information becomes available it will be shared with you.

First, the President is tremendously grateful to you, and to every member of his team, for your hard work over the past four years. He recognizes the sacrifices that you and your family have made to enable you to serve, and he is deeply appreciative. America has looked at the President's record -- continuing success in the war on terror, violent crime at a 30-year low, and declining drug use among America's youth, among other successes -- and asked him to stay on the job. He is honored and humbled by the privilege to serve, as I know each of you are.

Second, as we move into this transition period, the President has decided that he will not ask for letters of resignation. That said, as always, each of us serves at the pleasure of the President.

Third, some of you have expressed interest in serving in other capacities in the Administration, both within the Department and elsewhere. If you would like to be considered for other opportunities, please let me know what position(s) and agency or agencies you are interested in and I will work together with White House Presidential Personnel on those matters.

Additionally, if you are intending to leave the Administration within the next three months, please let me know that as well.

As we move forward, the Attorney General thanks you for your continued service and asks that you stay focused on the job at hand. While it is appropriate and good to celebrate successes, we cannot let it detract from the ongoing critical mission of the Department. Thank you again, and please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Susan

Susan M Richmond
Advisor to the Attorney General
& White House Liaison
Office of the Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice

By that email it strongly suggests that all of the USA's believed they could have been replaced before their 4 year term had expired.

[LiberalFighter]

7. He slipped this in I believe in an attempt to make the committee look bad if they don't agree

I wish to extend that sentiment to the Committee as well. During the past two years, we have made great strides in securing our country from terrorism, protecting our neighborhoods from gangs and drugs, shielding our children from predators and pedophiles, and protecting the public trust by prosecuting public corruption. Recent events must not deter us from our mission. I ask the Committee to join me in that commitment and that re-dedication.

[LiberalFighter]

8. National Security

Is his testimony about the firings of the USA's or also about the FISA courts and NSL's?

[LiberalFighter]

9. Protection of Children; Violent Crime; Drug Enforcement; Border Security

Pages 9 to 24 with the above and other non-related topics.

What the hell does this all have to do with the firing of the USA's?