|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Cash_thatswhatiwant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 12:32 AM Original message |
Rev. Al Sharpton to sue Rush Limbaugh over Wall Street Journal op-ed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. He has zero chance of winning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 07:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Winning is not the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Sharpton has no credibility and large judgements against him are still pending payment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. maybe according to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. He is a flawed instrument at best. His personal ethics remain very questionable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester Messiah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 02:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. There is no up-side for Rush in this contest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 03:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. In the words of Arthur Fonzarelli -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecklyTyler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 07:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. The up side for the Anal Cyst is face time in the national news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. Once again, Rush improvidently picked the wrong target. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 07:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Personally I hope Sharpton does some serious pushing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 09:08 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. No one takes him seriously nor should they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
8. Go Rev Al. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
11. dear lord, please hear my prayer -- may al drag rush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. Rush in the WSJ...lordy, lordy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. You know Rupert Murdoch bought WSJ in 2007, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 11:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Oh shit. No fucking wonder. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Yeah. Knew that. No surprise about Rush, I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
15. Go Al! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
16. GOOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
17. Does Rachel Maddow get to use the WSJ for her personal beefs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. Limbaugh won't apologize for this, and Sharpton can't win the suit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC