Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Lieberman JERK HIS CHAIRMANSHIP!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:48 PM
Original message
Joe Lieberman JERK HIS CHAIRMANSHIP!

Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs

As Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Senator Lieberman is working closely with Senator Collins to improve the security of Americans at home. The Committee has passed and Congress has enacted seven major pieces of legislation since the September 11 terrorist attacks to achieve this goal, including creation of the Department of Homeland Security, unifying the federal intelligence community, implementing the 9/11 Commission recommendations, and strengthening FEMA. The two Senators continue to oversee these laws to ensure their full implementation. Senator Lieberman also remains committed to the Committee's ongoing investigation into the roots, causes, and solutions for extreme islamic radicalization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. He should have never had it to begin with
I may say some not so nice things about the administration from time to time....however at least I fucking voted for the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Enough is enough.
President Obama tried to take the high road by letting him stay on as Chairman.

He campaigned against Obama. He spoke at the GOP convention.

Enough is enough. Kick him to the curb, and hopefully CT will do the same come reelection time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This 60 vote obsession needs to end
Let Lieberman join John McCain. We all know the asshole would be happier over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. yep
"60 votes" also doesn't mean so much when you don't actually have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
53. Exactly
We don't have 60 votes and we don't need Lieberman for anything.
Kick him out!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. A little Weasel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. I think you meant to say ' WEASELS '. I can't wait to see the day he's stripped of his chairmanship
and voted out of office by the electorate for his self-serving traitorous acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
49. Backstabbing turd
is how I think of him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lsewpershad Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
52. this
jerk has to go. Hopefully to real democrats will act now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Got to agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. ABSOLUTELY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jerk his Govt Run Health Insurance too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely.
Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lieberman is a snake in the grass...
....Let's see how he votes on HCR. He is one of our 60 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. True, has he declared yet? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He won't for a PO when the bill comes up but he might be one....
of the 60 to send it through to be worked on. Then we only need 51.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Interesting, thanks.
What a stand up guy!!! Sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I just heard that the snake is joining the GOP filibuster...
Now can we dump him back in their laps?

He was supposed to vote like a Dem as part of his deal to stay in power. So he's a snake and a traitor and a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I heard he is going to vote to filibuster it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. An insult to snakes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melbel8301 Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Insurance industry poster boy
Connecticut -- home to big insurance companies and bought and paid for Joe. Connecticut voters, why did you do this to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. It would require 60 votes for a new organizing resolution.
Much easier to accomplish at the start of a new Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. #33 here. They can't avoid it now. Not one week more.
Plus Lieberman has a key committee on national security. He's the guy who wants to pass a Senate version of the House violent radicalization bill - silence intense political debate on the internet by tagging the writers with any subsequent violent acts committed by anyone who reads it. AMF Lieberman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. This would be a last resort...
But if he is not on board the 60 votes in the end then they MUST PULL THIS TRIGGER - I can't imagine how they could possibly allow this chairmanship. What in the hell would it be worth to them if he doesn't tow the line here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Agreed. He should have to vote right on every party vote, or be stripped.
If this jerk doesn't vote right on health care, he needs to be stripped of all power and reduced to a GOP towel boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. How are these bad things? Implementing the 9/11 Commission recs? Strengthening FEMA? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. Played his last card
Keeping Joe from filibustering healthcare reform, was the ONLY reason to let him keep his chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. Those chairmanships are a PRIVILEGE, right?
And as a an Independent, it a DOUBLE PRIVILEGE for Lieberman.

Reid should invoke party prerogative and kick Lieberman to the curb.

The Democratic party has chosen it's course. Lieberman promised to caucus with Dems.

It's time to END that association.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. The chairs are set out in the organizing resolution at the start of a new Congress
If Reid wanted to "strip" a member of their committee assignment mid-session, he would have to file a new organizing resolution, and this would face a cloture vote.

So this thread is just a bunch of hot air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. So there's no way chairs can be fired?
They're there for a whole Congressional term?

That sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Reid could file a new organizing resolution.
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 08:39 PM by tritsofme
These are normally non-controversial procedural bills.

But it would face a cloture vote, and its doubtful that the same Senate who failed to invoke cloture on a HCR bill could do so an a retaliatory organizing resolution. Lieberman would have to agree to his own demotion for this to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Go Nuclear
That's the option left. It just takes a motion to the chair concerning the rules. Once you open it up it might take two three months to fight over every rule, but then the senate is useless as teats on a boar hog anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. Lieberman appeared at the opposing party's national convention and endorsed their candidate
and criticized the Democratic Party's candidate. It doesn't get more treacherous, disloyal, and disgusting than that. After that, he should never have been allowed to caucus with the Democrats on principle, no matter how much his vote was needed. And now that his vote is needed, he continues to turn his coat. Big surprise. After his incredible speech against Obama on the same stage where Sarah Palin appeared, the rest of his treachery is just a footnote.

Here are some of the things he said while endorsing McCain:

Senator Obama is a gifted and eloquent young man who can do great things for our country in the years ahead. But eloquence is no substitute for a record—not in these tough times. In the Senate he has not reached across party lines to get anything significant done, nor has he been willing to take on powerful interest groups in the Democratic Party. Contrast that to John McCain's record, or the record of the last Democratic President, Bill Clinton, who stood up to some of those same Democratic interest groups and worked with Republicans to get important things done like welfare reform, free trade agreements, and a balanced budget."

"When others wanted to retreat in defeat from the field of battle, when Barack Obama was voting to cut off funding for our troops on the ground, John McCain had the courage to stand against the tide of public opinion and support the surge, and because of that, today, our troops are at last beginning to come home, not in failure, but in honor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Joementum needs to be stripped and "DRUMMED OUT"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. Harry said Joe was okay...
Harry should be stripped too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
32. and his committee memberships
make it so lieberman can vote on things in the full senate and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
33. If Durbin gave him permission to go rogue, he can keep his chairmanship.
I am calling Durbin's office today to see if he gave him permission. Anyone can join.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
35. And while they're at it:
Nuke the filibuster! Tell Harry Reid: change the rules to 55 or 51 for cloture! FU 60!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. On the other hand:
Just let the fool Liarman bring on a filibuster! That should be quite a sight! Should really increase the popularity of Liarman and the other republiCONS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
37. if Lie-bore-man-boy threatens to filibuster with the repukes, the Dems should threaten him with his
chairmanships. you side with the pukes and we yank you out of your seat fukhead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bsd13 Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
38. What exactly does his position on health care
have to do with his chairmanship of this committee? As far as I can tell nothing whatsoever. So why then would he be removed from the chairmanship? Has his threat to filibuster health care "reform" somehow compromised his ability to chair this committee, or is this simply a matter of "he screwed us, so we'll screw him" thinking?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. There is a long tradition of using chairmanships and committee assignments
to facilitate party discipline. I, personally, don't believe he should have been allowed to keep the chairmanship in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
12AngryBorneoWildmen Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
39. Ho' Lieberman
does it for dough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlevans Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. But how do you jerk a jerk?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
41. K&R. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
42. Yes - give him the heave ho
If Harry doesn't do this, Harry needs to be replaced quickly, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
43. "But he caucuses with the Dems!!!!" they all wail.
Who cares? He doesn't act like one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la_chupa Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
44. Conn needs to help us out
they're our only hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
45. He's not a Democrat. Take it away and give it to whoever STEPS UP FOR THE PEOPLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. No Cloture - No Chairmanship
Keep it simple for Joe to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
48. Jerk His Chair!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
50. I concur.
He caucuses with the Democrats, in return for his cloture vote. No vote, no fucking chair. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-28-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
51. jerk off on the jerk. he might even approve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC