Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we broke it...we have to break MORE of it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:57 AM
Original message
If we broke it...we have to break MORE of it?
We're mainly going to be going in their to kill people and destroy stuff. How does that can lead to stuff getting rebuilt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fock me, ken, why another post based on that flawed assumption when
three combat brigades out of thirty thousand people are what's being sent?

Do you enjoy being disingenuous???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The flawed assumption is that war can still lead, in this day and age
to rebuilding, and that invasion is "fixing it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How do we invade where we are already located???
If he were sending 30,000 COMBAT troops I'd be right there with you.

If Bushy had done what Obama is about to do, we'd have been out of there years ago.

Cleaning out the sewer that is the Bush/Cheny/Rummy/Wolfowitz legacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How many in a "combat brigade?"
2,000? 5,000?

Are we talking Infantry brigades?

I was looking here to find out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_units

I am wondering what is the make-up of the 30,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Depends on the branch of service, I believe -
I saw that wiki page, too..

I heard on NPR about an hour before the speech that is was three combat brigades - a MAXIMUM of 15000 people - probably closer to 9 or 12,000....

Like I said, if he were sending 30,000 ground pounders I'd be off the hook.

At a minimum, 15,000 trainers, construction people and support folks can train battalions in very short times - relative to what they have been able to do so far.....

This shit might just work....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Maybe, but there are a lot of variables, like thousands of "contractors" (mercenaries)
who go around killing civilians and blowing up shit with predator drones.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090817/scahill2

(snip)

Despite its scandal-plagued track record, Blackwater (which has rebranded itself as Xe) continues to have a presence in Iraq, trains Afghan forces on US contracts and provides government-funded training for military and law enforcement inside the United States. The company is also actively bidding on other government contracts, including in Afghanistan, where the number of private contractors is swelling. According to federal contracting records reviewed by The Nation, since President Barack Obama took office in January the State Department has contracted with Blackwater for more than $174 million in "security services" alone in Iraq and Afghanistan and tens of millions more in "aviation services." Much of this money stems from existing contracts from the Bush era that have been continued by the Obama administration. While Obama certainly inherited a mess when it came to Blackwater's entrenchment in Iraq and Afghanistan, he has continued the widespread use of armed private contractors in both countries. Blackwater's role may be slowly shrinking, but its work is continuing through companies such as DynCorp and Triple Canopy.

(snip)

Doesn't Donald Rumsfeld own interest in DynCorp?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Blackwater or whoever they fucking claim to be now need to go.
period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Apparently, Erik Prince "views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims
and the Islamic faith from the globe."

Erik Prince kinda reminds me of this guy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. He really does.....
I understand Blackwater 'assisted' some DEA drug busts in Sandy Eggo last year, maybe the year before.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Haven't you ever stabbed someone, and then they start screaming,
and then you get really really scared, so you stab them again and again? Next thing you know your grocery bill is cut in half for about a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. So the grocery bill is pared back and I don't even have to
Use coupons?

I think I need to consider this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. We don't break things.
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 02:22 AM by EFerrari
We protect against threats to our national security.

We defend the dignity of peoples.

We train armies and help other nations learn how to govern themselves.

We're responsible.

If things get in our way and break themselves, well, shit happens.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, like gawd damn those Cambodians who let that Pol Pot
Guy walk all over them, right after we screwed up the Far East during that Vietnam era stuff.

You'd have thought they'd have undercooked his pork or something, rather than being so willing to comply with his wretched demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. more death will bring more happiness and peace see
war is peace, left is right and up is indeed down. this is all double plus good and certainly not double plus un good....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Going further in is getting Out. Up is Down. War is Peace. White is the new Black. KILLING ...
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 03:05 AM by Triana
is PRO-LIFE and MORAL ...haven't you HEARD?


EDIT: :sarcasm: (better not forget THAT or my ass will get chewed into mincemeat in here...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. Peace means we let them kill each other but at least we pull out
as long as we get out we don't care what happens to the people and that may be the right attitude - if intervention is not good for America we will not intervene to prevent genocide or mass murder. We should only care about our welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. That's right - as long as we don' see it on the television, who gives a shit.
I got a new ipod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. The "Pottery Barn" metaphor was NEVER appropriate.
The "Bull in the China Shop" is a better fit.

Before cleaning up the China Shop, it is necessary to first remove The Bull (The US Military).

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Great point, bvar n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. You think Afghanistan was some kind of paradise before we got there?
Where there was nothing but peace and love and ice cream???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Of course not. But we can't make it better by expanding a war against it
and the Afghan people are going to take this as a war against THEM. Karzai is just another Diem or Thieu and that fact will make whatever we do militarily untenable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Our Nobel Peace Prize Winner just escalated a war.
The irony.

Do we really think we can kill ALL Al Queada members? Really?

Do we really think we can kill ALL Taliban members? Really?


The earth is a pretty big place. How many acres are needed to set up a terrorist training camp? Seems like a pretty small number. So, are we literally going to police every acre of ground around the globe, employing the Bush Doctrine ad infinitum?

Its ludicrous.

We can either:

End the American Empire. Close bases. Bring troops home. Reign in the CIA, Blackwater (XE), etc. And become more self-sufficient

Or

We pay the price for being 5% of the world's population that consumes 25% of the world's resources (ie 9/11).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's the well known Pentagon strategy of drowning out fires with kerosene.
Also known as the "Look! Look! We're doing SOMETHING!" strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC