Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal employees earn 2% pay raise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
newblewtoo Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:52 AM
Original message
Federal employees earn 2% pay raise
Is anyone else just a little outraged by this story?

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/12/federal_employees_earn_2_pay_r.html


In fucking credible..............





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unfucking believable. They should up SS 2%. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Outrage? A 2% pay raise is nothing. What is wrong with workers earning money?
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 10:59 AM by FSogol
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. When that same federal government comes out and tells seniors
they will not get a COL increase this year because of inflation, even though medical costs are way up, then ya...I have a problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Let me see if I get this
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 11:14 AM by Lone_Star_Dem
Since the SS COLA isn't tied to health care, energy and transportation costs, which it should be by the way, then every person that is employed by the federal government should be punished? Since when have these employees been the ones deciding what factors are taken into consideration when determining the cost of living adjustments applied to Social Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Across the board raises for everyone employed by the federal
government seems a little excessive in light of the decision made about seniors, state employees across the country being furloughed, and the economic conditions in general. I can see merit raises based on individual performance, but that is not what this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. It's not a decision made about seniors. It's a flaw in the formula.
Your other point isn't viable, we'd spend more money than the 2% raise will amount to in attempting to implement a merit based evaluation system where one doesn't currently exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Then adjust the forumla for SS COL increases. Why punish thousands of employees? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not at all
That money goes right back into the economy. A 2% pay raise for the postman who delivers my mail? The US Park Ranger who gives National Park tours? The clerk at the Department of the Interior? Hell yes.

There are many federal employees, most of whom don't make a whole lot of money. This is money right back into the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1. It is sad that Reagan and his cronies created such a hatred for the Federal workforce.
I deal with a lot of those people on a daily basis and for the most part they are underpaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. and they pay taxes like everyone else
Well, everyone who gets a paycheck. Lots of other people make millions and pay lesser rates when all is said and done by their accountants and puppets in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. No, I'm not outraged
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 11:00 AM by GoCubsGo
I know several federal workers (USDA, Forest Service, ACOE, USGS, Fish and Wildlife) who work their tails off. Why do you want to begrudge them a pay raise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. um, only outrage is that the worker bees who keep things humming along
aren't keeping up with inflation OR the increases in their insurance costs.

Fucking incredible that anyone would expect public servants to keep losing ground. Workers in private sector tend to get paid a LOT more for comparable work, and the fed employees tend to have a whole lot more oversight than most in private sector.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. You're kidding right?
I'm in no way outraged to know that there are a some civilian federal employees out there getting a 2% raise.

If there's a good place to spend our money that's one of them. It stimulates all the local economies in which these people live and just may possibly help some of these people actually pay their bills this next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. That they got only a 2% raise?
Not sure what the outrage is about.


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'll be outraged if it doesn't extend to Federal retirees....like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. I get a federal pension too
and I feel extremely fortunate to get it!

My husband worked for Unisys which had contracts with the federal government. Unisys offered a pitiful pension, nothing like a federal pension.

So please stop complaining. If the non-federal retirees find out the difference in your (and my) pension and their pension, they may elect someone who will start REDUCING our pensions!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Well, I don't consider my pension a gift. I earned it.
30 long years. I'm not complaining, just expecting what was promised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Not as much when compared to the constant congressional self-imposed raises
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Outraged enough to post it twice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newblewtoo Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Nope, not that outraged
I have no idea how that might have happened. Perhaps a friendly mod can fix that. Thanks for pointing that out, I had to log out an back, this computer is not quite state of the art and often hangs up when I post (one reason I don't post often).

Many comments on this thread echo my outrage. I know many people who are being laid off, facing cuts in hours, or cuts in their rate, that coupled with no raise in SS, it seems it would have been better defer it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Actually only 1 out of 20 replies agreed with you. There is nothing wrong with
a pay raise for Federal Employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. the outrage is this raise while Social Security is frozen for 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC