Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Felonious Five prepares to take another crap on democracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:43 PM
Original message
The Felonious Five prepares to take another crap on democracy
from the Wall Street Journal:



Campaign-Finance Ruling Looms
By JESS BRAVIN


Montana voters, fed up with the grip of out-of-state mining interests on local politicians, passed an initiative in 1912 banning corporate spending on candidates for state office. As soon as Tuesday, that law -- and similar ones in nearly half the states -- could be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court for infringing corporations' free-speech rights.

None of those state laws specifically were at issue when the court agreed to hear Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which challenged provisions of the federal McCain-Feingold Act. The 2002 law built on a longstanding ban on direct corporate giving to House, Senate and presidential candidates by reining in so-called issue advertisements, such as television spots a corporation takes out on its own to help a particular politician's election or defeat.

Under the law, corporations and unions may not use general funds for such advertisements within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a general election. Instead, they must channel their electioneering through political action committees that solicit contributions from executives, employees, shareholders and other affiliates of the corporation.

The case initially involved a feature-length movie attacking then-presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, produced by a conservative advocacy group chartered as a nonprofit corporation. But instead of delivering an opinion after March arguments, the Supreme Court in June ordered re-argument on a much broader question: Should prior cases that upheld restrictions on corporate independent expenditures be overruled?

In 1990, the court voted 6-3 to uphold the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which, like the McCain-Feingold provision, required corporations to raise funds through political action committees for their electioneering efforts, rather than draw from profits or general treasuries. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126023967777081231.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to get rid of the cooperations as persons legal fiction.
The United States is the only country in the world with this BS.
Corporations should not have free speech. Corporations need regulations to operate under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC