|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:26 PM Original message |
How did a firecracker get through security at the airport? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. It was in Amsterdam. Try asking them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Caballero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Firecracker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Such a catalyst can be made from a slurry of kitchen matches - may not even be a firecracker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. It was some type of explosive in his underware... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. worrying if international airports don't have adequate screening of explosives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazer47 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. You don't seem to grasp the totality of it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. you can get most anything non-metal though if you put in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. that is worrying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. They took my little bottle of "special" shampoo ( we blondes are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not really very hard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Way2go (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Others may have been caught & we just didn't hear about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. Isn't that a deficiency? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. The PETN (explosives usually used as a detonator) was sewn into his underwear. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I really don't like the idea of explosives in my underwear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I'm pretty sure this guy was burned badly by the experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. Not a firecracker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Is it wrong to wish him being ball-less? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Great Balls of Fire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. You will only know when the Darwin Awards come out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 08:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. shouldn't security be able to detect PETN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libertas1776 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. It was a mixture similar to nitro-glycerine, not a "firecracker" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. See, I'd make a lousy terrorist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. "Love spuds!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carlbenator2 (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. A Lousy Terrorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
19. I read it was loose powder which he then ignited. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. It was first widely reported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 07:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. You are being kind saying the reporting was confused. Its been lousy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Yes. And CNN went from 'he had extensive connections with' to 'he had none' in the span... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC