Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secondhand smoke linked to common nasal and sinus condition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:31 PM
Original message
Secondhand smoke linked to common nasal and sinus condition
Nearly 40 percent of chronic rhinosinusitis diagnoses are linked to secondhand smoke, according to a Henry Ford Health System study.

Researchers found that people are at increased risk for developing rhinosinusitis from exposure to secondhand smoke at home and public places like bars and restaurants, but that the risk is even higher at work and at private social settings.

The study is believed to be the first time researchers evaluated the association between secondhand smoke and chronic rhinosinusitis, one of the most common health conditions in the United States affecting more than 39 million people, or one in seven adults, every year.



http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-04/hfhs-sss041610.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. From the Institute for Researching The Obvious. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shocking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
:popcorn:

I'm going to wait for the DU smoke brigade to come claiming:

1) If the ban cigarette indoor smoke... they should also ban cars
2) Business owners have a RIGHT to pollute their patrons and workers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Additionally, the righteous railings against a "Nanny State"
Additionally, the righteous railings against a "Nanny State" always seems to be in the playbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Would you accept a compromise? No indoor smoke, no unnecessary car trips?
Here's the thing:

Indoor smoking is bad. We can agree on that.

Some car trips are necessary. Some aren't.

How do we define which ones aren't?

Sometimes I drive to work because it takes less time and I've got more important things to do. (Like smoke cigarettes).

Which circumstances is it ok to drive?

If we accept the premise that there should be limits on when you can cause pollution with cigarettes, why shouldn't we question when it's ok to pollute with auto exhaust?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. In other news: second-hand marijuana smoke linked to...
contagious euphoria
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Not necessarily
I've been in extremely close quarters with pot smokers and felt nothing. But I don't like smoke of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. In me it's just linked to asthma attacks.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. In other news, researchers discover that living leads to getting older n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. If there is a smoke....you might want to move away from it, right?
besides, most of second-hand smoke is between friendly audiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. tell that to a kid whose parents smoked like chimneys
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 06:57 PM by WolverineDG
ie, me

even though they knew I am highly allergic to smoke, constantly had sinus problems AND asthma as a kid, they continued to smoke indoors from the moment they got up until they went to bed.

So, please, do enlighten me as to just how a minor child can just "move away" from the smoke. I got out of there as soon as I could once I hit 18.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I spent most of my childhood with sinusitis, when it didn't go into pneumonia
It was tough to "move away" from the source of the cigarette smoke when my father was a chain-smoker in a 1200 square foot house.

If people choose to smoke, that's their thing, but I stay away from it in the interests of staying somewhat healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. My husband had serious asthma as a child and teenager
When he moved out of his parents' house and no longer lived with his mother chain smoking, his asthma almost completely went away. It resurfaced for a while, but once we taught his cat to not sleep on his pillow, it got cleared up. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Delete dupe
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 06:30 PM by Better Today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Interesting it could be started, "nearly 60% of CDR are linked to NOT breathing second hand smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Uh, yeah
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 10:44 PM by DavidDvorkin
Irrelevant, though.

More than 99% of sudden deaths are not caused by running across a freeway during rush hour*. That doesn't diminish the stupidity and horrible danger of running across a freeway during rush hour.




* I'm guessing at the number. But it seems like a reasonable guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Anecdotally, it may be irrelevant, but you need "data" on this-
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 11:06 PM by MrMickeysMom
What is common sense, still requires legitimacy to be taken seriously.

I know some would argue, "if that's so, why is the climate change issue not getting its due? Well, passive smoking can be quantified to the bad outcome. Remove the 2nd hand smoke and compare the better outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. I'm sorry, but when I read that they've found increased risk, I expect to find
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 09:25 AM by Better Today
that more than 50% to be related to 2nd hand smoke. This report is completely screwy from anything I can see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wow, what a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Just this study, or all scientific studies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. In what journal will you be publishing your findings, Dr. Bell?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
23. Should be declining now that smoking in public is banned in most places, I would think.
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 09:55 AM by laughingliberal
On edit: Now let's find out what's causing the other 60% and ban that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC