Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California’s Prop 16 is Worst Measure on June Ballot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:14 PM
Original message
California’s Prop 16 is Worst Measure on June Ballot
(Prop 16 has been packaged as the "Taxpayers' Right To Vote" Act, and the TV and airwaves have already been blanketed with ads supporting it, all paid for with corporate MONOPOLY money)

Every election cycle has an awful state ballot proposition, with plenty of corporate funding to fool voters. For the June primary, it’s Prop 16 – a thinly veiled power grab by PG&E to shut down competition to keeps its monopoly. As more California cities consider providing their own energy through Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), PG&E feels threatened that consumers will finally have a choice. Prop 16 would require that local governments get a two-thirds vote of the electorate before entering into CCA agreements – efforts that PG&E will surely throw millions into defeating.

Ironically, Prop 16 only needs a bare majority to pass – to mandate a two-thirds threshold before consumers can quit PG&E. And while CCA efforts would then face impossible odds at prevailing, it’s not like PG&E needs two-thirds approval before it becomes your energy provider. Just like health insurance companies fear the “public option” because it would keep them honest, PG&E is bankrolling the Prop 16 campaign to block competition. And with an expected conservative voter turnout in June, Prop 16 could very well pass.

It should be obvious by now that two-thirds majority requirements have ruined the state. Although Democrats have a permanent majority in the state legislature, Republicans call the shots when it comes to passing a budget – just because we are the only state in the nation to require a two-thirds majority for both the budget and taxes. At the local level, cities are being forced to make devastating cuts – because any local tax increase requires (in most cases) a two-thirds vote by the electorate. It’s a tyranny of the minority, and the last thing we need in California to be even more dysfunctional is another such measure.

But PG&E has funded all of the $6.5 million behind Prop 16 so far – and as voters start paying attention to the June ballot propositions, expect them to dwarf this figure in no time. They hope to tap into populist anger in these tough times against politicians, saying that the public should have a “right to vote” before local government goes into the energy business. What they’re really afraid of is fair competition, and their failure to live up to minimum renewable energy goals. It’s about killing Community Choice Aggregation.

http://www.laprogressive.com/the-environment/californias-prop-16-worst-measure-june-ballot/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's awful. enough with the propositions Californians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. We need to get rid of these fucking initiatives, as well as the fucking 2/3 BS.
Let the legislature legislate as a representative government.

The initiatives have been nothing but disasters for CA since their inception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Before we get rid of the propositions let's pass the one legalizing weed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. you nailed it.........
didn't realize it only needed a majority. this is a scary precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I haven't seen one ad against it. I wonder why? I just seen who was
behind it and that done it for me...PG&E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. The title's a dead giveaway: "Taxpayers' Right To Vote" Act
With a title like that, it's pretty much guaranteed it has NOTHING to do with taxpayers' voting rights, and EVERYTHING to do with a special interest's hidden agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, but uninformed people will be proud to endorse taxpayers' right to vote
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 09:47 PM by NBachers
These propositions with their misleading titles are the shits.

I used to sign propositions that sounded supportable, but now I avoid all the paid signature harvesters.

No more propositions. They're ruining a great state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Citizens right to control PG& E. Vote no on prop 16.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've been posting flyers around town.

PG&E ARE THEY ON YOUR SIDE?
Prop 16 IS Bankrolled by PG&E
VOTE NO PROP 16

PG&E ARE THEY ON YOUR SIDE?
VOTE NO ON Prop 16
Public Power Is Cheaper Than PG&E
VOTE NO ON PROP 16

PG&E ARE THEY ON YOUR SIDE?
VOTE NO ON Prop 16
PG&E IS SPENDING MILLIONS & MILLIONS & MILLIONS AND MILLIONS MORE.
VOTE NO ON Prop 16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. They should have a proposition on proposition titles
Call it the "Truth in Propositions" Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. California is fucked up because of this proposition system
the voters are too fucking stupid also. even after all these years and the lies they are fucking stupid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC