Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I may vomit. So might you at this column by David Brooks.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:14 PM
Original message
I may vomit. So might you at this column by David Brooks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/opinion/04brooks.html

I paste the link so you can get the entireity of this vomitus. Sorry I cannot give it to you in small bites.

You need to read this...I am furious...it is incredibly stupid and insensitive and dumb. The man has lost his senses, once and for all.

I cannot believe his ethnocentrism and ego and god knows what else...nothing more to say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm a Swedish-American.
Well, 25% of me is. So would I fit into Brooks' ridiculous stats or not? What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The 2.9 more years of average life expectancy that Swedes in Sweden live
is, contrary to Brooks, very significant. It's three more years at the end of their lives. Wouldn't most people take those three years when they reach their 70s?

His argument is full of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I read that at lunch
Brooks is less lucid than that Douthat tool the Times keeps publishing...and that is saying something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have no idea what he is trying to say. The piece seems a muddled mass of
poorly interpreted statistics intended to obliquely establish correlation to racial and ethnic origins. The author labors under the delusion that putting strings of unrelated facts (we can only assume he has at least mined some real data to use here) together in sentences and paragraphs demonstrates real world correlation, and somehow it should all be clear as a summer morning to anyone of average intelligence.

The author has not even the courage to come out and say what it is he means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He's trying to say race is a stronger determinant of how well one does in life
Edited on Tue May-04-10 07:36 PM by BurtWorm
than liberals think it is. But his evidence for this is weaker than water.

(It's truer to say racism is a stronger determinant of David Brooks argument than he admits it is.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, But he hems, haws and is reluctant to make the point succinctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Social liberalism in this country has raised whole levels of people out of poverty.
JUst look at Social Security and Medicare with the elderly. Or the GI bill VA loans with veterans. Just to name two humongous examples.

What is the matter with this guy? Has he just lost his way. Is he just in his ivory tower and can't see what is before him?

Racism at its very CORE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a steaming load of nonsense.
Brooks doesn't even realize that he's conflating different sets of statistics to arrive at a foregone conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC