Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama announces a "Commission to investigate the accident" not good.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:07 PM
Original message
Obama announces a "Commission to investigate the accident" not good.
Edited on Sat May-22-10 12:07 PM by Stuart G
"As Obama officially unveiled a commission to investigate the accident, he issued a stern message that while keeping pressure on firms involved in the still-uncapped spill — BP, Halliburton and Transocean Ltd — he would also hold Washington accountable for mending its ways."...from one of many current news stories..

Elaborate Commissions don't seem to work. I recall the Warren Commission on Kennedy's Assignation. Almost 50 years later, we still have many unanswered questions. How about the 9/11 Commission?. We know for sure they did a lousy job. Most of the time, it is the beginning of some kind of "cover up"

I wish Obama would have the military take complete control and throw BP out. Use BPs equipment and get them out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
charlesg Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was just an ACCIDENT - like Rand Paul said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. oh right. an accident. Like, they accidentally didn't prepare
contingency plans that were supposed to be on file. They accidentally drilled quite a bit deeper than they were licensed to. They accidentally went rushed ahead with finishing off the cap after their pressure reports showed leaks in the cement job. Andthey accidentally didn't notice there was oil gushing for several days...until they couldn't hide that little fact any longer.

Just like I accidentally ran a traffic light and mowed down a pedestrian. Yeah, it's true the mechanic said I needed new brakes, but that would have cost too much money. Besides, after I paid off my cousin, I got an inspection sticker, so the brakes really were ok. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your last sentence woudl violate the law.
The law puts the onus completely on the oil company and the feds have no power to do that.

In order to take over the effort, one of three things must happen:

1) Martial law is declared. Obama can then nationalize all BP assets in the US and take complete control. Lovely, we give up all civil liberties over an oil spill.

2) A legislative action is passed by the House and the Senate and signed into law by Obama. Possible, but extremely time consuming. In fact, the relief well would take less time to drill than getting such legislation passed.

3) A court order turning over control of the effort to the feds. The problem is, you would have to have grounds to bring such a suit in the first place and to date I see no such grounds for civil action to obtain such a court order.

So there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. so once again poor widdle Obama is helpless? is that what you're saying?
Edited on Sat May-22-10 12:30 PM by ima_sinnic
I wonder why you minimize what is happening by calling it "an oil spill"?
Have you been asleep for a month? How can you call an out-of-control gusher a "spill"?

Then you imply that, since it's "only a spill," it's not worth giving up "civil liberties" for. Since it's a planetary threat, it should be treated as such. It would seem the most important "liberties" being considered are those of BP's. You imply it's not worth being radical about.

You don't see "grounds for civil action to obtain such a court order"? What about willful negligence, incompetence, and a threat to the human race?

But since your opinions are such a perfect reflection of the conservative corporate kowtowing and bowing and scraping of this administration, I can only conclude that your excuses for doing nothing are approximately those that the president would use.

Fuck it, just let the oil run dry from that well. Put a gun to the head of the earth and get it over with--oh, be sure the corpos make their last billion or so first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. He parades around as a "Progressive" but on the rare ocasion he posts something of sustance that
isn't an attack, there is very little to be found that doesn't bring two words leaping to the mind.

1. Paid

2. Hmmmmm, what is that second word.....Rhymes with Thrill....

Oh, I'm sure it will come to me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. He doesn't need to declare martial law or use all the powers in that act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Expropriate without compensation
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And Watch Gas Prices Soar To $5 A Gallon...
...along with everything else that requires oil...electricity, food and transportation for starters. Yep that'll really make things a lot better.

I'd prefer to sue them into submission...make them have to spend as much on lawyers as they do on lobbyists and drain the life out of them that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. fearmongering becoming a democratic tactic?
Yeah, let's just pee down our legs and DO NOTHING.

That'll teach the oil companies.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's see...who will be on this commission? Oil industry insiders?
Because they have the knowledge necessary to determine what happened and who's at fault?

Right.

Rooster guarding the hen house.

Alcoholic with a key to the liquor cabinet.

Bank robber with the combination to the safe.

When will the madness end? We need outsiders who will question EVERYTHING and demand PROOF when they are told something. Enough of this corporate America insider shit. All that's done is bring us corruption, abuse, waste, and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The lies on this are incredible. The truth will not come from BP...
Who knows what damage they have done in their efforts to "stop this"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Co-chairs are one of NDC's founders and a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would prefer a police commissioner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. The thread at this link, attempts to answer some of these concerns,
Edited on Sat May-22-10 12:35 PM by Stuart G
by scheming daemons..but it has been 30 days, these assholes, BP, don't seem to be doing much...Many of us are very very angry.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8391240&mesg_id=8391240
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think we need to form a commission to investigate
DC's love of forming commissions to everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I suggest an exploratory committee be formed to look into this matter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. so he's treating even this as "business as usual," eh?
even as the world's oceans are under threat, and by extension the entire planet because of the interconnectedness of life, he is stuck on "bipartisanship" and the most stuffy, stultifying, wishy-washy, most ineffectual response.

whatever. I plan to enjoy my remaining few years however I can--hopefully any robbery of Social Security will kick in after I'm gone or after humans go extinct, whichever comes first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, the wildlife has nothing to worry about now. Whew! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Warren Commission did NOT examine JFK's "assignation!" That would have been interesting!!!!
Edited on Sat May-22-10 04:36 PM by Captain Hilts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. the word is Assassination.....now my defense on this .follows.
Edited on Sat May-22-10 06:16 PM by Stuart G
originally I spelled it assination,,,,so.....spell check said change to ...assignation .
..which was the top pick...so I changed it..to that..forgetting that the correct spelling is assassination..Yes, I did use spell check..next time I will use google.

So..spell a sentence using... assinatin..try it. thanks
,,, and I know that my fellow travelers is spelling hell understand.

also...I am sorry for taking this off topic, but I thought a rebuttal was in order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Spell check IS problematic!
I hear you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. he should investigate his own administration
and ask why the gave bp a pass on standards.

THAT'S why this happened.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Form a blue ribbon bipartisan commission" = The Kiss of Death
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. oh boy. a stern warning. BP is shaking in its collective boots, I'm sure.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I don't think BP gives one damn what Obama or anyone thinks..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC