Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bachmann Blasts 'Redistribution Of Wealth' Escrow Fund, Says BP Shouldn't Be 'Chumps'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:27 AM
Original message
Bachmann Blasts 'Redistribution Of Wealth' Escrow Fund, Says BP Shouldn't Be 'Chumps'
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 09:28 AM by babylonsister
How does she get away with this shit? :grr:


http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/bachmann-blasts-redistribution-of-wealth-escrow-fund-says-bp-shouldnt-be-chumps.php?ref=fpb

Bachmann Blasts 'Redistribution Of Wealth' Escrow Fund, Says BP Shouldn't Be 'Chumps'
Eric Kleefeld | June 16, 2010, 10:07AM


Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is emerging as a fierce critic of the Obama administration's proposed escrow fund to handle damage claims against BP.

The Minnesota Independent reports that Bachmann spoke Tuesday to the Heritage Foundation, and badmouthed the idea. "The president just called for creating a fund that would be administered by outsiders, which would be more of a redistribution-of-wealth fund," said Bachmann. "And now it appears like we'll be looking at one more gateway for more government control, more money to government."

Also, David Weigel reports that Bachmann also said: "They have to lift the liability cap. But if I was the head of BP, I would let the signal get out there -- 'We're not going to be chumps, and we're not going to be fleeced.' And they shouldn't be. They shouldn't have to be fleeced and make chumps to have to pay for perpetual unemployment and all the rest -- they've got to be legitimate claims."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a ridiculous, horrible, stupid person she is. nt
Edited on Wed Jun-16-10 09:30 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Keep talking, Michele Bachmann.
You are presenting your party cleanly and clearly to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. And as Americans get poorer and poorer, they prolly think redistribution
of wealth wouldn't be such a BAD thing after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. bachmann is a evil woman
just so long as she gets farm subsidies for her family farm and she and her husband still get money from the state for letting his clients talk to god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Bingo.
Farm subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironrooster Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. BP needs more than "fleecing" they need to be stripped to the bone.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. So Ms. Bachmann thinks 'perpetual unemployment' isn't a legitimate claim after a corporation
destroys one's livelihood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. there are no words for her except dingbat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. The lengths to which good soldiers will go to protect their corporate masters is truly astounding.
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bachman advocates for socialism, and yes, it's redistribution of wealth.
...from the wealthy criminals who caused the disaster to the innocent citizens who are being harmed.


She's actually advocating socialism (of losses).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. The check is in the mail, Michelle
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. What I don't understand is how all the ignorant and stupid
individuals from Minnesota are constantly being picked up by the media. Pawlenty and Bachmann can't take a breath if the media doesn't repeat their spews.

I suppose they are like that will all the stupid republicans, Palin, and Fiornia, Whitman, Angle gee whiz they all are so stupid that people in other countries must think we don't have an education system in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. MSM shouldn't give these idiots the time of day except to point
out they need a psychological evaluation. And not by Bachman's associates..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbixby Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. What I don't get is that MN is a pretty blue state
Yet all you hear about is from these stupid teabaggers....I can't wait til november when we can drum them both out of office (T-Paw for sure, Bachmann might be more of a fight)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. But it's okay to "redistribute" our tax dollars to BP via military spending?
The perpetual unemployment is a legitmate claim, and just a drop in the bucket. Does she really think that the fund is going to government? She doesn't even bother to shape the talking point into an approximation of a valid criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. How did someone so ignorant and stupid make it through puberty
without being run over crossing the street. This lady needs therapy and maybe a stay at an ashram.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Teabaggers are a gift that just keeps on giving n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. In loony Bachmann's world the only risks for
corporate capitalists are borne by taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titanothere Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. She's right on one point though
It's pretty crazy to think that the Administration can just say, "You know what, how about you give, oh I don't know, 20 Billion dollars into this account here and someone, not sure who yet, will have unfettered control to distribute it as they see fit. Yeah, can I get that check today? Because I've got a lot of friends that need to get paid."

Where's the rule of law in that?

We're not talking about paying actual costs and compensations, it's just a ballpark number completely made up that, as far as I can tell, there's no negotiating on and once paid it's just gone. Who's going to be the puppetmaster of this slush fund because I'm sending them a Christmas card ASAP, grooming their dog or whatever.

BP would be fools to go along with this. Seriously. They may end up paying more than $20B after it's all said and done but it's got to be legitimate. We are still a country of law and order and I'd like to see it stay that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Your contention that "we're still a country of law and order" is inaccurate....
...our government has been highjacked by special (read: wealthy) interests who laugh at any laws that don't serve their purposes.

And the President could declare a national emergency and seize BP legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Alright you want law and order put the SOBs from BP
GWB and Dick F----g Cheney in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Wait . . . what?
Who said anything about "unfettered control"? Do you have a basis for that? And as for who pays into the fund, who else besides BP do you think should fund it? Considering the track record so far of BP (remember their first estimate of the amount leaking out of the well head was 1,000 barrels a day; best estimates now are many times that), do you think that BP has earned the right to administer anything, let alone the compensation fund for its victims?

And what do you consider "actual costs and compensations"? If someone loses their Gulf-based livelihood forever, are they entitled to income for life, or just until BP gets tired of paying them? Why do you think the fund is a slush fund administered by a puppetmaster who would be swayed by your Christmas card or offer to groom their dog? Do you have a basis for that assertion?

Your post seems to be long on conjecture and very short on facts. Please feel free to supplement it with any facts you might be able to bring forward. Citations and links would be appreciated, Titanothere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titanothere Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. It wouldn't limit their liability, but how do you know for sure it'll be that much?
We all assume it will be but until the bills are calculated you don't know. My understanding, which may be inaccurate, is that the money once paid into the escrow account could only be used for the purposes of expenses related to the oil spill. No, I'm not an escrow expert so maybe if costs don't meet that limit they could get their money back.

Here's one citation and a quote from the Dem caucus.

This account wouldn't limit their liability; it seems more like their just trying to get a big chunk of cash before BP potentially goes under and pays other creditors first.

Would you pay double your income taxes early in the year on the chance you made more than expected at the end? I doubt it. I'm just talking business sense here; if someone asks for 20 billion up front, you're gonna push back guilty or not.

And it is an independent trustee, whatever that means. I don't know what rules would be in place for distribution. Which we can't because nobody's said yet.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/06/senate_dems_to_bp_20_million_e.html
---
In order to ensure BP fully and quickly covers the costs of this disaster, we are calling on BP to immediately establish a special account of $20 billion, administered by an independent trustee, to be used for payment of economic damages and clean-up costs. Establishment of this account would serve as an act of good faith and as a first step towards ensuring that there will be no delay in payments or attempt to evade responsibility for damages. Although creating this account at this level in no way limits BP's liability, we believe it will do more to improve BP's public image than the costly public relations campaign your company has launched.

We appreciate your interest in fully and quickly reimbursing those who have been injured by your actions. We believe the establishment of the $20 billion account to compensate victims and provide for clean-up is a useful first step for demonstrating that BP intends to meet its commitments. In light of the urgency of this matter we ask the courtesy of your response no later than June 18, 2010.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. So . . .
Rather than the nonsensical assertions of your first post, you're willing to concede that you (1) don't know what an independent trustee does; (2) no rules for distribution have been promulgated; and (3) you don't know what you're talking about.

Thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titanothere Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I concede no such thing
My assertation was that BP's not going to want to cough up $20B which neither they nor the government have control over.

And I haven't seen an explanation for items 1, 2 or 3 from you either so I guess we're both on the sidelines in this game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I am not concerned about BP in the least, along with the $20 B
the management should be locked up along with GWB and Cheney for gutting the regulations on the oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. BP's agreed to the compensation escrow account. Agreement
was hashed out in a meeting of their lawyers with Admin lawyers, iirc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. "Where's the rule of law in that?"

The "rule of law" in the first instance, is anything to which two parties may agree.

The offer to BP to fund a settlement account may be made in exchange for avoiding other litigation, and is a perfectly fine offer for them to accept.

How about "do this or you'll never be approved to drill another well in the United States again", or "do this or we'll think about criminal prosecution of a laundry list of folks".

When you possess nuclear weapons, you can drive a pretty hard bargain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
37. Ding! WINNER! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. Bingo. BP agreed to do it. I thought freedom of contract was a big GOP thing? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. You do know what escrow means
don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. You're funny.
Not 'Ha-ha' funny.

In the head funny.

Slush fund my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. are folks afraid of her criticism? Obama should put her on ignore, & BP in temp receivership today
are we catering to her insanity? are we afraid of upsetting her?


why even mention this dangerous nitwit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. Bachmann has the PR instincts of Idi Amin.
Way to defend a huge corporation that 95% of America hates, Crazy Eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
28. " 'We're not going to be chumps, and we're not going to be fleeced"
The corporation that is responsible for the greatest ONGOING ecological catastrophe in recorded history, with UNKNOWN, possibly worldwide pollution implications to the environment, and INCALCULABLE short/long-term physical/reproductive harm or ultimately death to some, many, most if not all living things shouldn't be fleeced?

Right, CRAZY-EYES, their business should be liquidated and every single one of its employees who have ANY degree of culpability in causing the disaster arrested, tried, convicted, all of their personal assets should be seized, and then they each should be sentenced to varying lengths of imprisonment, or even capital punishment, based on their degree of responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbixby Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I think they already made chumps of themselves
And they deserve all the fleecing they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
30. Who the fuck votes for this nut?
"fleeced and make chumps to have to pay for perpetual unemployment.."

She HATES Americans, and has no soul, her supporters are that dumb??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. I can't imagine many people voting for her after this stupidity.
I think most Americans see having dollars set aside by BP in an escrow account is in the American people's interest.

Bachmann loses big time on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. Yes they are.
They gerrymandered a bunch of reich-wing scared little taliborniagains into one district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. Bachmann needs to pray 24/7 for a redistribution-of-brains...
Because she was soooooo left out at birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. Barbour/ Bachmann 2012
Because Batshit Crazy always needs a voice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
36. That women is a fruitcake!
Yeah, let's let BP take the wealth of the Gulf, just flat out fucking steal it.

She is a creep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
40. Un-fucking-believable. Why is financial restitution for harm done considered
redistribution of wealth by people like Rep. Bachmann? I have NO doubt that were her property to be destroyed by someone, she would not view restitution therefor as redistribution of wealth.

It's absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
42. Yeah BP shouldn't be chumps.
That's what the Tea Party is for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzelle Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
45. Bachmann is the worst pond scum on earth.
someone should do a Sharron Angle "2nd amendment remedy" on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
46. Ya know...
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 03:34 PM by AsahinaKimi
If you ever put that woman in a room full of mirrors..she would likely never find her way out ...
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
47. When will this ignorant wench be voted out of office?
If she hates the government so fucking much, why does she have a job in it??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC