Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sounds like Scalia and Thomas were selected to represent the interest of crooks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:10 AM
Original message
Sounds like Scalia and Thomas were selected to represent the interest of crooks
Edited on Fri Jun-25-10 08:18 AM by The Backlash Cometh
The Supreme Court just weakened the anti-corruption laws. But Scalia and Thomas would have struck them down completely:


Ex-Enron chief could benefit as Supreme Court ruling weakens anti-corruption law

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, speaking for the court, said the law "criminalizes only schemes to defraud that involve bribes or kickbacks." It does not cover, for example, the case of public official who fails to disclose a possible conflict of interest.

In the cases of Skilling and Black, "we express no opinion on the question of whether the error" in their trials "was ultimately harmless but leave that matter for consideration on remand," Ginsburg said.

Although the majority of justices agreed to narrow the law to cover only schemes where a public official or corporate executive enriched himself or herself at the expense of the public or the shareholders, Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas would have gone further and struck down the law entirely, even when bribes or kickbacks were involved.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/nationworld/la-na-court-corruption-20100625,0,2036389.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Republican presidents are putting Corpo-Fascist's on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So....?
All with Dem help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Really. Who's sorry now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Please don't forget judicial activist Chief Justice Roberts
Edited on Fri Jun-25-10 08:24 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
Who lied through his teeth about respecting stare decisis and who went out of his way to broaden the question before the court in order to dismantle democracy and sell it to the highest bidder with his Citizen's United "money is speech" travesty.

There has been a concerted effort underway for years to pervert and derail the judicial system for political ends, both within the Justice Department and the Supreme Court and we are finally seeing the culmination of it. We just also got their "Protecting Corporate Criminals" decision. I'm sure there's a lot more to come.

Our legislators are bought and sold and our judges are the same except for some holdovers. We are truly in the twilight years. The light gets dimmer each and every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Scum of the Earth.
With all due respect to scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm going to be the first to say it.
Our Supreme Court is turning into a papal state. They're suppose to help us avoid the implosion of our country. Instead, they're speeding it up by taking the power out of the hands of the voting public, and putting it in the hands of the oligarchy which they are a part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You're right and I get it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. I say let's pitch in and buy the SCOTUS 5 a well-deserved vacation
snorkeling in the Gulf of Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC