Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(John) Kerry may need to pay $500k tax on yacht

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:01 PM
Original message
(John) Kerry may need to pay $500k tax on yacht
Source: My Fox Boston

FOX 25 / MyFoxBoston.com) - There are new details in the controversy over Sen. John Kerry's brand new boat.

Kerry may still be on the hook for a half million dollars in excise taxes because he docked his yacht in Massachusetts less than six months after buying it.

The controversy came up following a report that Kerry moored the multi-million dollar yacht in Rhode Island, rather than the Bay State to save on sales tax.

A spokesman for the senator says Kerry never intended to evade taxes and kept the boat in Rhode Island for maintenance reasons.

They say he's willing to pay the tax if necessary.

Read more: http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/kerry-may-need-to-pay-500k-tax-on-yacht-20100726



I never get this. Why do people do this? Especially John Kerry? Don't people feel a patriotic duty to pay the taxes they owe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never get this. Why do people do this? Use Fox as their source?
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 12:04 PM by OregonBlue
Please go post at a board the believes Fox is credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This is myfoxboston and not Fox News
That is like saying you consider watching Family Guy to be a sign of support for Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. FoxBoston is partisan too!

One a-hole news guy referred to Bill Clinton as "Willy boy" with a tone of disgust.
The fact that you are posting this BS in the first place is enough to start a flame
war here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Do you have a link to that?
The story looks accurate so I'm not sure why this would cause a flame war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I saw it when I was flicking channels

It was a WTF piece of crap. And we live in a free country. People can park their boats wherever
they choose too. Many people park their boats in different states and even in different countries!
There's no rule that tells you where to park your boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You must think everybody here is stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. they took the reporting from Murdoch's Boston Herald which completely spun their conclusions
to make it sound like Kerry was trying to avoid taxes, when the FACT is that if he planned to AVOID the taxes he never would have stopped in Mass with the boat in the first place. And, secondly, why wouldn't they dock the boat in Newport since that is where they usually sail out of as Teresa has a home there?

All of a sudden Kerry is going to turn into a tax cheat? Ridiculous. Especially since Teresa spends millions in Mass alone on healthclinics for the poor and environmental programs that rehab and green buildings and housing - millions that the STATE of Mass doesn't have to spend.

People need to get their facts straight before they jump on Murdoch's shitpile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fox? Please stop posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. ?
See post # 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Are you kidding?
Many pages in this Fox Television Stations, Inc. web site feature links to other sites, some of which are operated by companies unrelated to Fox Television Stations, Inc. Fox Television Stations, Inc. has no control over the content or availability of any linked site. TM and (c) 2010 Fox Television Stations, Inc., and its related entities. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication, or distribution in any form is expressly prohibited.


link

It's right wing drivel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lightning Count Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That makes zero sense.
They are a local station that deal with local issues. Like I said, that is like saying that watching Family Guy is a show of solidarity with Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. You aren't kidding? Here
WFXT

WFXT is a television station owned and operated (O&O) by the News Corporation-owned Fox Broadcasting Company, located in Boston, Massachusetts. The station's studio and office facility is in Dedham, Massachusetts, and its transmitter is located in Needham, Massachusetts. WFXT is one of six Boston television stations seen in Canada by subscribers of the Bell TV satellite service.



Boston, Massachusetts
Branding Fox 25 (general)
Fox 25 News (newscasts)
Slogan So Fox 25
Channels Digital: 31 (UHF)
Virtual: 25 (PSIP)
Subchannels 25.1 Fox
Owner Fox Television Stations
First air date October 10, 1977
Call letters' meaning FoX Television
Former callsigns WXNE-TV (1977–1987)
Former channel number(s) Analog:
25 (UHF, 1977–2009)
Former affiliations Independent (1977–1986)
Transmitter power 780 kW <1><2>
Height 330 m
Facility ID 6463
Transmitter coordinates 42°18′12″N 71°13′8″W / 42.30333°N 71.21889°W / 42.30333; -71.21889
Website myfoxboston.com



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Are you really that ignorant or just hoping against hope that we are? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Posting Fox News stories? n/t

Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry and a million+ people do this in the US.
Lake Erie has boats registered in the same manner for goodness sake. Determining what taxes are owed is the flaw in your question. If he follows the rules he would legally not owe taxes on the purchase. I am no Kerry fan at this point, but I won't let it pass that this is the way business is done if you are a 'bigga boy'. Patriotic people would pay for the wars they love to roll around in but you don't see that happening in the US either. That my friend is a crime that starts from the bottom up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Taxes are for the little people....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Enjoy your stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. welcome-ish to DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank goodness Rupert Murdoch would never do such a thing
You know, like change his citizenship just to avoid taxes, or something. Because you can bet, boy, that the bloodhounds at Fox News and all their affiliates would be on it quicker than a duck on a junebug!

Wait; those sound more like crickets than junebugs . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let me tell you about sailing
If it was my boat I would do the same thing. Not to evade any tax, but because the Rhode Island dockage offers better nearby sailing along the rocky coastline, as well as better maintenance availability and storm protection than Nantucket or MV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's not breaking any laws.
Lots of people dock their boats in states other than the one they live in. My understanding is that the boat is also being chartered which is another way of avoiding tax by writing off the depreciation. No doubt these tax laws are also taken advantage of by the republicans that wrote them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Its called tax avoidance, and its quite legal. Everyone with high value assets does it.
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 06:36 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
I saw/heard a couple of stories that said he left it moored too long in Mass so he may the owe taxes anyway. The formulas for that are empirical without a lot of wiggle room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. I should care about this why? "May" is not news. Call me when he refuses--if he indeed has to
actually pay.

Really lame story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. No one gives a fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Actually its all over RW sources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No one here gives a fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Roger that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
27. I don't think anyone...
... is morally required to pay more taxes than they legally owe. And I don't think Kerry owes those taxes. I do understand why some people might feel differently, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
28. Jesus age, can people understand
that the human animal will do what he\she can to maximize personal assets?

No, Homo Economicus is not fully true, but aspects of it are true.

Riddle me this, if you had that much money would you try to avoid paying taxes? Be honest here.

Why things have to be done at the POLICY level to encourage a different behavior. Oh and in this case, actually it is smaller than other policies in the aggregate, so this would not be in my priority list. There are a few OTHER policy changes I'd do first. You know like ENCOURAGING companies to keep jobs in the US, or bring them back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. Um...good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC