Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Clinton really to blame for everything?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:48 PM
Original message
Is Clinton really to blame for everything?
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 08:55 PM by Renew Deal
I know that's overly broad. I just saw something interesting in Food Inc. They said that NAFTA opened the American corn market to Mexico thus unemploying 1.5 million Mexican farmers. Guess where those farmers went? Here. So even when we benefit from NAFTA we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. not everything, just everything NAFTA related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. .... and repealing Glass/Steagall, and China in the WTO, and
......Im sure theres more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Not just NAFTA....
... opening the trade floodgates with China, welfare "reform", all kinds of regulatory malfeasance.

Clinton is/was a douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. and don't forget my dog's arthritis! Actually, he is the blame for
a bunch of stuff that precipitated our long national decline. And he is responsible for a lot of good stuff. I am not blind to what my leaders do. May he find hell for Nafta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Except for the stuff that's Carter's or Obama's fault.
Though i will agree with you partly - NAFTA was a great big poke in the ass to America, and is gonna cost us for quiet a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Year of the CLENIS!!!!!!
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 08:51 PM by Taverner
Be afraid, very afraid!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The ALMIGHTY CLENIS lives on!!1!!
:woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm happy to see you back.
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. NAFTA, viewed historically, will turn out to be one of the most epic mistakes in American history.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton finished off Media De-regulation that Ronnie Raygun started...
We ended up with Faux News and Clear Channel Radio and Rush Limbaugh on every radio in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I understand he was behind the creation of the unrecommend feature at DU. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clinton didn't negotiate NAFTA.
That was before his time. His action on it shows it was the establishment, consensus trade position


Obama claims he will renegotiate or opt out of it, FYI. Will he? Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Reagan first mentioned it, and then Carla Hills and the Bush I crowd
did the negotiations and signed the agreement in 1992. Clinton inherited the implementing legislation in 1993. Sadly, he abandoned us and pushed it through Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. With that said, the Clinton/Gore administration was quite publicly favorable to it
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 09:01 PM by Oregone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. You're defending Clinton on NAFTA while criticizing Obama?
This is the second time I've come across this phenomenon. The other maintains that at least Clinton is sorry for DOMA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Im stating two facts
1. Clinton did not negotiate NAFTA (that happened under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement">Bush/Mulroney/Salinas). Clinton did finalize it (put in measures to make it pass muster in Congress) and supported it publicly

2. Obama claimed he will http://www.cfr.org/publication/15604/democratic_debate_transcript_cleveland_ohio.html">renegotiate NAFTA or opt out of it

Neither of those equate to defending or criticizing either one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton? Ancient history, Pops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. of course not
I can criticize Clinton for a lot of things, including substantive actions like NAFTA and--I'll let other posters fill in details here--and I can criticize him for the fact that, by failing to keep his pants zipped and then lying about it he cost the Democrats a presidency and seats in Congress.

Similarly I can criticize Obama and his administration for a lot.

But, compared with Reagen, Bush I, and definitely and God help us Bush II, and definitely and God helps us John McCain, either Clinton or Obama is a shining example of everything wonderful by comparison. The by comparison says a lot though. I don't won't to compare.

I want to hold Obama's feet to the fire to push him to do better.

And its of somewhat limited value to weigh Clinton's faults and accomplishments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The lesser of two evils is what? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. His position supporting NAFTA was a disaster...
For Mexican and American workers who lost their industries to the cheap labor markets overseas, NAFTA was a death knell to a way of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Clinton is to be blamed for war crimes in the Balkan war
for the genocide that is Plan Colombia, and for keeping the torture school known as SOA/WHINSEC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh hell yes- First it was Clinton who screwed up everything
by giving us all those billions in surplus that tempted Bush to spend them and run up a deficit poor little guy. As the whole shebang skipped over Bush and then Obama finished the job. Didn't you all know that. Gee of course you did the republicans tell it over and over. Clinton had a terrible recession. Bush cleaned it up and then Obama started it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. Adam was the first fuck up, Carter was next, Clinton came later, and now Obama
ask any Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. Well we know for a fact that Republicans are not to blame for anything.
They have told us so and they are NEVER WRONG about anything..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC