Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Finds Most Oil From Spill Poses Little Additional Risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:52 AM
Original message
U.S. Finds Most Oil From Spill Poses Little Additional Risk
this article even has a nice little chamber of commerce picture with it...



WASHINGTON — The government is expected to announce on Wednesday that three-quarters of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon leak has already evaporated, dispersed, been captured or otherwise eliminated — and that much of the rest is so diluted that it does not seem to pose much additional risk of harm.

A government report finds that about 26 percent of the oil released from BP’s runaway well is still in the water or onshore in a form that could, in principle, cause new problems. But most is light sheen at the ocean surface or in a dispersed form below the surface, and federal scientists believe that it is breaking down rapidly in both places.

On Tuesday, BP began pumping drilling mud into the well in an attempt to seal it for good. Since the flow of oil was stopped with a cap on July 15, people on the Gulf Coast have been wondering if another shoe was going to drop — a huge underwater glob of oil emerging to damage more shorelines, for instance.

Assuming that the government’s calculations stand scrutiny, that looks increasingly unlikely. “There’s absolutely no evidence that there’s any significant concentration of oil that’s out there that we haven’t accounted for,” said Jane Lubchenco, head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the lead agency in producing the new report.

She emphasized, however, that the government remained concerned about the ecological damage that has already occurred and the potential for more, and said it would continue monitoring the gulf.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/science/earth/04oil.html?_r=1&ref=global-home&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. dontcha love the early morning manure spreading?
Yeah -- the oil went away all on it's own. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and love the picture....people frolicking and birds enjoying the cool, clear water
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 07:57 AM by spanone
god knows why we got so upset over the darned spill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. With rigs in the background.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. This has been an illuminating event

Could it be any more clear that our government is subject to Capital?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. it appears we were all upset over absolutely nothing...nevermind
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 08:13 AM by spanone
we should just drop all regulations on offshore drilling since there are no consequences for millions of gallons in our oceans....:sarcasm:

i believe we are witnessing one of the greatest p.r. scams in history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Yeah, so far anyway.

But it is a subset of the scam called Capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. one of the greatest p.r. scams in history
paid for by the people with the most money...Capitalism doesn't care for people, critters, nature...just for the profits and stopping any profit loss...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Put on a happy face!
Gray skies are gonna clear up, put on a happy face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. What Would George W. Bush Do? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. the same, no change here! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. It all went poof! 20 yrs on & the Exxon Valdez oil still contaminates the area, but this
one, the oil has just gone away. What magical times we live in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Apples and oranges
The Exxon Valdez ran aground and all the oil from it dumped out right on, or very near the shore in shallow water. This oil soaked into the ground where it couldn't disperse or release many of the volatile compounds. That's why it's the gift that keeps on giving.

The Deepwater Horizon leak happened many miles off shore where the oil could be collected and dispersed before such volume could reach the beaches and inlets. Dr. Lubchenco is not saying there isn't more significant environmental impact that's yet to be realized and in fact, she warns about it in her statement. She is saying that in all likelihood, we won't be having an Exxon Valdez volume of oil washing up on the shore which would mean this disaster would be many times worse than it already is. Seeing as how she's highly qualified to make such an assessment, I tend to believe her. That doesn't mean we won't be living with this mess 20 years from now because we undoubtedly will. Many of the heavier compounds sank to the bottom of the ocean and there's little doubt much of this made it past the continental shelf, so the environmental impact from that remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. So all those millions of barrels of oil and tons of corexit just went poof?
How very reassuring. Well, OK, not very.

You'll pardon me if I still don't go ordering gulf shrimp any time soon.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LargeGreenSpider Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Idiot on radio news this morning told me ,,,
most of the oil is gone. No kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great news.
I think a lot of the worry was overstated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. LULz
"pre-existing condition"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. great fake news...i think our current situation is understated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. oh, cool. what were you all making such a fuss about??
problem solved!

USA! USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. lol, hookay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. Just a flesh wound!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. Whoever wrote this bullshit need to eat a big plate of oysters on the half shell dug up from the
DEAD BED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. drill baby drill! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
23. Key Paragraph:
The lead agency behind the report, the oceanic and atmospheric administration, played down the size of the spill in the early days, and the Obama administration was ultimately forced to appoint a scientific panel that came up with far higher estimates of the flow rate from the well. Whether the new report will withstand critical scrutiny is uncertain; advocacy groups and most outside scientists had not learned of it on Tuesday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. we are being rickrolled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Uhhhh....
:wow: :spray:

They so funny..... :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC