Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold Says No To Amending The Constitution To Deal With Illegal Immigration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 03:13 PM
Original message
Feingold Says No To Amending The Constitution To Deal With Illegal Immigration
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/feingold-no-amending-the-constitution-to-deal-with-illegal-immigration.php?ref=fpi

If Republicans seriously want to amend the Constitution to do away with birthright citizenship, they're right about one thing: the first place to start is with Congressional hearings. Today, in a statement to TPMDC, the senator who would chair those hearings says that's not gonna happen.

"We can and should address the problem of illegal immigration head-on without amending the Constitution," says Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI). "The way to do that is to pass bipartisan comprehensive legislation improving border security, protecting American jobs and addressing those currently in the country illegally. It is past time for Congress to resume the bipartisan effort that was started by President Bush and enact meaningful federal immigration reform."

In response to a push by rank and file Republicans to prevent children of illegal immigrants from being granted citizenship, GOP leaders are pressing for official hearings on changing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Feingold chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, where those hearings would be held and the process of amending the Constitution would likely begin.

These political theatrics are mostly designed to fire up the GOP base. After all, any proposed Constitutional amendment would require the support of a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, and would then need to be approved by three-fourths of all state legislatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heart Feingold. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC