Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sunday NYT publishes correction on nearly 40-year-old Vietnam editorials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 09:05 PM
Original message
Sunday NYT publishes correction on nearly 40-year-old Vietnam editorials
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/opinion/08sun3.html?ref=opinion

Because of a cover-up, cowardice and scapegoating in the Nixon White House, editorials on this page in the early 1970s misstated the role of an Air Force general in a series of bombing raids of North Vietnam.

The general, John D. Lavelle, commander of the Seventh Air Force, acted with direct authorization from President Nixon when he ordered more than 20 airstrikes against North Vietnamese antiaircraft missile sites between November 1971 and March 1972. As General Lavelle insisted then, he was not a rogue officer waging his own “massive, private air war.” He did not willfully violate rules of engagement, nor did he authorize flight crews to file false reports.

This correction was delayed because Mr. Nixon; his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger; and top cabinet and Pentagon officials never revealed evidence that would have exonerated General Lavelle. The truth lay hidden for nearly 40 years in the squalid thickets of the Nixon tapes. Researchers brought the facts to light in 2007, leading to revised accounts of the case, explained in a Defense Department announcement last week.

... General Lavelle died in 1979, having always said he acted on orders. His widow, Mary Jo, 91, and their seven children learned last year that the Air Force had granted their request to have General Lavelle’s military records cleared. It is now up to the Senate to posthumously restore his four-star rank, which President Obama asked it to do on Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kind of like the e-mail I got earlier this year
Very random and out of the blue, from a someone who bullied me in middle school 22 years ago. It was an apology.

I pointedly rejected the apology and told him to go fuck himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. After 22 years, you hadn't moved on and couldn't accept an apology?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattleblue Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If you are comparing being bullied in middle school to the honorable
actions of an air force general, please don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think the Times has more to apologize for than that
I stopped buying the Sunday Times around then because of their Vietnam coverage, and though I don't recall the specifics, it certainly wasn't over Lavelle.

So it would be nice to see the honesty go a bit deeper.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC