Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Fiderer: Financial Regulations Meaningless Without Gov't Vigilance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 10:47 PM
Original message
David Fiderer: Financial Regulations Meaningless Without Gov't Vigilance
Edited on Sun Aug-08-10 10:47 PM by Hissyspit
http://ctwatchdog.com/2010/08/07/financial-regulations-meaningless-without-govt-vigilance

Financial Regulations Meaningless Without Govt Vigilance
By David Fiderer | Last updated Aug 7, 2010, 7:23 pm

Past is prologue, and everything you need to know about the financial meltdown can be gleaned from a single article published more than five years ago in The Los Angeles Times .

- snip -

The story explains how fraud had gone viral at the nation’s largest subprime lender, Ameriquest Mortgage Company. “In court documents and interviews, 32 former employees across the country say they witnessed or participated in improper practices, mostly in 2003 and 2004. This behavior was said to have included deceiving borrowers about the terms of their loans, forging documents, falsifying appraisals and fabricating borrowers’ income to qualify them for loans they couldn’t afford.”

The most important part, the part that explains everything, is not contained within the text. It’s the reaction that ensued thereafter. Nobody cared. Nobody who mattered, anyway. Sure, the article was picked up by the Associated Press and some other papers piggybacked off of the initial reporting by Mike Hudson and E. Scott Reckard. But the gatekeepers of the financial system ignored the story and its broader implications.

- snip -

The financial media didn’t really care either. Neither The Wall Street Journal, nor CNBC, nor Forbes, nor Fortune, nor BusinessWeek gave the story much if any play in the year following the story’s release on February 5, 2005.

Most importantly, the heavy hitters in the government didn’t give a damn.

- snip -

The fraud was easy to find if you were willing to look for it...

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC