Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leading Republicans call for partial repeal of 14th Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:30 AM
Original message
Leading Republicans call for partial repeal of 14th Amendment
A constituency within the political establishment has been consolidating in recent months for a repeal of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which provides that every person born in the US is guaranteed citizenship. This reactionary proposal, ostensibly to combat “illegal” immigration, has broad and far-reaching consequences for democratic rights in the US...

Over the past week, leading Republican senators have publicly given consideration to introducing a constitutional amendment that would repeal the citizenship clause...Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, indicated that he supported holding hearings on whether the 14th Amendment citizenship right should be abolished. The campaign to abolish the citizenship clause has been accompanied by an accelerating xenophobic campaign against immigrants and their children...

In every country, hatred of immigrants has long been promoted to divide the working class along national and ethnic lines and to provide a base for right-wing policies. In the US, it is the cornerstone of a growing quasi-fascistic element in the political establishment that has the increasing support of major sections of the media.

The assault on the 14th Amendment, however, is not only an attack on undocumented workers and their children, it is an attack on the right of citizenship itself, with broad implications for the democratic rights of the entire population...The 14th Amendment, drafted in 1866, contains many of the most significant of the US constitutional protections...The right to citizenship is a right on which many other rights depend...If citizenship can be revoked and a non-citizen can be denied constitutional protections, then the entire system of democratic rights can be bypassed and a class of persons with no rights can be created. This is what is behind Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman’s proposal in May of this year for a “citizenship-stripping” law. This proposed law would empower the State Department to revoke a person’s citizenship if the person were found to have engaged in “terrorist activities” or other acts of “disloyalty.” A number of prominent Democrats have signaled support for such a law, including Charles Schumer of New York...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/aug2010/amen-a09.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Okay, we revoke the amendment...
and decide any child born of two Republican parents doesn't receive citizenship until after he or she passes the same citizenship test my great-granny Pucci had to take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denbot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would agree if the repugs agree to insert to the 14th that corporations are not persons.
Sucks to even think about it, but this would be a good trade off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. but it's going to be: *only* corporations are persons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. why does it suck to even think about it?
It's that important to you that all babies born here automatically become US citizens, even if their parents are here illegally or just on vacation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. blahblahblahrushlimbaugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. As much as I hate the phrase...
Edited on Mon Aug-09-10 03:21 AM by Chulanowa
Don't like it? Leave. I am willing to bet any amount that you are the progeny of someone who was never fucking invited over here in the first place. Either you are an anchor baby, or you are the descendant of people dragged here by previous anchor babies.

Get the fuck over yourself, you are not special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Joe Lieberman is EVIL!!!
That man knows knows no bounds, and to think he was almost vice-POTUS, a heart-beat away from the presidency!

Regarding the citizenship clause, what do the backers expect will happen to children who were born here, raised all their childhood lives here, and then suddenly finding themselves in limbo with NO place to call home, no citizenship ANYWHERE? Do we really expect the parents' host countries to take them in? What do we do with them? Just lock them up indefinitely in some remote detention center?

It's a real mess and I really don't think these 14th Amendment revisionists have really thought it through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC