Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Avoid Bragging? Avoid Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 08:44 AM
Original message
Avoid Bragging? Avoid Obama?
Edited on Mon Aug-09-10 08:46 AM by n2doc
What kind of political machine is it that takes its leader and its accomplishments and hides them under a figurative rock? Are they ashamed of what they have done, realize that it really isn't what Americans want/need, or are they too brainwashed/cowed by the RW to play to an apparent strength?

Democratic candidates all but ignore their legislative successes
Avoid bragging, strategists advise, and warn against putting Republicans back in charge.


By Janet Hook, Tribune Washington Bureau
August 9, 2010

Reporting from Washington — As Democrats fan out across the country to campaign for reelection this month, many are surprisingly quiet about their hard-won accomplishments — the major bills they have passed under President Obama.

In an effort coordinated with the White House, congressional leaders are urging Democrats to focus less on bragging about what they have done — a landmark healthcare law, a sweeping overhaul of Wall Street regulation and other far-reaching policy changes — and more on efforts to fix the economy and on the perils of Republican control of Congress.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-dems-august-20100809,0,6906697.story

Obama coming to raise cash, not boost White
Other Democrats unconcerned governor hopeful is skipping president's visit to Texas
By KELLEY SHANNON
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Aug. 7, 2010, 8:19PM


AUSTIN — President Barack Obama's trip to Texas on Monday aims to do something Democrats are still good at in this conservative state - raising money. But it's not designed to bolster the chances of Democrat Bill White in the governor's race.
The former Houston mayor is making a play for moderate voters in both parties and doesn't plan to appear with the president. And the political team for Obama and the Democratic National Committee doesn't appear too concerned with whether White wants Obama in the state.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7144096.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Per Menendez and this article, the reason is the Dems want
to emphasize the choice between political parties, not make it "a referendum on "whether you like or don't like what we did."

"In everything we do, we have to drive that contrast," he said as the Senate wrapped up its legislative business and disbanded Thursday for the August recess.


I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. We must remember short attention spans and Americans. KISS aka keep it simple, stupid.

(Not you, just in general)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, so mandated Health Insurance and a handout to Wall St. are "successes," eh?
Who knew?

I would avoid talking about that stuff, too, if I were them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, that is the question
Is this a tacit admission that they haven't been doing "the people's business"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ya know, if Republicans spent as much time whining about what they didn't get...
as we do, Reagan and Bush would have been one-term Presidents.

Look at the right-to-lifers-- all these years and they still don't have their abortion ban but they still vote for "maybe next year."

Maybe they're stupid, but who's winning elections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC