Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "professional left" message boiled down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:04 PM
Original message
The "professional left" message boiled down
Our support for Obama is very limited we will kick his ass every chance we get to move him in the correct direction.


(yes I stole and paraphrased this from another member who summed it up so well)


Obama's implied response: Ok, expect to get kicked back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why should Obama be kicking the people whose votes he'd like to earn or keep? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because Gibbs is still his press secretary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not sure I understand your response.
Do you mean that because Obama has to defend his buddy Gibbs, he has to allow him to insult part of his base in an election year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. It's obvious that Obama would rather lose the votes of his base rather than his press secretary.(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I think he and his administration are just ridiculously tone-deaf at times.
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 12:53 PM by superduperfarleft
Of course, he's got his die-hard supporters on DU who strive to make it look even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. He obviously doesn't care about us, because he's still got Gibbs working for him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Maybe some of them will pull heads from rear orifices
and focus on the upcoming election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, insulting potential voters is definitely the best way to win them over. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. If a small but loud segment of voters picks a public fight
and ignores other attempts at communication, I don't know why they would expect any different result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I guess I give Obama a lot more credit than you.
Even if I may disagree vehemently with him on certain policy issues, I still don't believe that he is as much of a petty, mean-spirited child as some of his supporters on DU are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. All I see is name-calling, not a meaningful reply. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Because they make a nice scapegoat?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Other parts of the message
were that wanting the type of health insurance system that provides twice the care at half the price is just as crazy as leaving this country defenseless by abolishing the military; and that anybody who doesn't think the way the DLC does has got to have their brains fried on drugs.

And they wonder why we're annoyed.

Saying this sort of thing at any time is stupid and self defeating. Saying it in an election year when every single vote will count is monumentally stupid and self defeating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Health care legislation is done for this year
we barely got it passed. Why do you want to beat the horse in the runup to the election? Do you all have a time machine or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Excuse me? What does that have to do with anything?
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 12:19 PM by Warpy
The issue is the equation of a desire for more progressive legislation in the future with the complete abandonment of the military.

Nice try at a red herring but Gibbs stepped in major doo doo and we all know it and this is one of the ways he did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, that is not the issue
The issue is frustation due to lack of understanding the process or any attempt to understand the process. Circular firing squads, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The "process" was cut at the fucking knees when single payer
was cut from even coming close to the damn table. And guess where that buck stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That buck was killed in something called an election
There is zero gain from bashing the admin over it, bashing the admin over that is most like a baby crying because it can't do anything for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Poor baby. Live in reality like the rest of us.
Like my SIL who just had her second mild stroke and did not go to the ER because she has no insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I have never heard the administration say
the bills they signed were perfect or anywhere near to it. I do recall how long it took to get some of them through congress, and I recall the President doing what he could to maintain pressure on Congress to get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. We understand the process all too well; we've seen it multiple times now.
Edited on Fri Aug-13-10 07:10 PM by Tesha
We start with a fairly centrist Democratic position.
Obame and his minions then *GIVE AWAY* all of the
bargaining chips before negotiations even begin.

Then, when the proposal looks exactly like a proposal
Richard Nixon's Republican team would have delivered,
it goes to the House and they reluctantly vote for it.
Then it goes to the Senate where the Republicans and
the Blue Dog "Democrats" block it for being not completely
Neanderthal.

Obama's method of playing three-dimensional chess is
to sacrifice his queen, both bishops, and a rook and
a knight *BEFORE* the other side even begins playing,
and then he lets the other side make half his moves
'for" him.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. You should be asking Gibbs, since he brought it up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. He was addressing critics of the administration
who have done nothing but bring it up over and over and over in an unending whine fest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Get used to it, 'cause we're not shutting up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That advice goes both ways of course. nt
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 12:42 PM by BootinUp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Earned criticism is not a "whine fest." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. How dare you deviate from the approved talking point,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I like your forum name. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. You barely got it passed because your politicians took the stupidest possible approach...
...to getting it passed. The very, very first thing
they did was water the legislation down to the point
of being meaningless in the completely vain hope that
they would get some Republicans to back it.

Your politicians had the folks on my side not only
banned from having "a seat at the table", but saw
them threatened with arrest if they came anywhere
near the negotiations.

Your politicians threw away the one feature (the
public option) that *MIGHT* have made the bill
palitable, the one feature that might have saved
it from being a complete giveaway of our money
to the insurance companies.

And now you want my vote? Somehow, I don't think
it's my side whose brains are fried by drugs,

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC