Maddow: "If DADT is going to end, the President could stop enforcement of that policy. Why isn't he?

[Bluebear]

via Americablog: Rachel Maddow closed her show last night with a rather strong broadside against Robert Gibbs and President Obama, over DADT, but more generally, over everything. Rachel says this White House refuses to spend political capital, refuses to show guts. She says the White House won't stop the DADT discharges now because "it would be hard." She concludes:

"If DADT is going to end, the President could stop enforcement of that policy, pending that change. Why isn't he?"

Why isn't he? Because either the policy isn't ending, or the President is afraid of something. Afraid of standing up to the Pentagon (remember, THEY work for HIM), afraid of spending political capital, afraid of making Republicans angry, afraid of doing anything that in any way might seem "controversial."

It's interesting that Rachel did this, since the White House made quite a big deal recently over her recent broadcast in which she praised Obama and his accomplishments. I'm guessing the White House won't be sharing this video with anyone. It's spot on.

http://gay.americablog.com/2010/08/maddow-if-dadt-is-going-to-end.html

[LaurenG]

1. This is one of the reasons I'm not happy

Come on Mr President, Just do it!

[BrklynLiberal]

2. Her show last night was a classic...should win awards.

It was at the Edward R. Murrow level.

Courageous, intelligent, fact-based, coherent and truth filled.

[Parker CA]

3. I agree. One of her very best. nt

[zipplewrath]

4. No Drama

I'm afraid of the many reasons for this. The one that is least frightening is "no drama".