Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attention Red State LGBT couples: Start getting married!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dragonbreathp9d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:15 PM
Original message
Attention Red State LGBT couples: Start getting married!
With the current decision as it stands, federal law must allow you to get married! Texans, Arkansans, Alabamans, and everyone else who lives in a bigoted state - lets shove their faces in it, be proud, and get married!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's only in California
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 03:16 PM by LostinVA
Or did something happen today I haven't heard about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Judge Walker's ruling only applies to California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Not an expert here but why not 9th Circuit?
Having not read the ruling, I can't quite see why it would only refer to prop 8 (even though that caused the suit) when it's based on Federal guarantees and is a decision made by a Circuit judge. I can understand why not national, but unsure why only CA. Note - this is a question not an argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. The case was brought before the District Court for Northern California.
The Prop 8 supporters would have to appeal the judge's ruling for the case to appear before the 9th Circuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. My bad - confused it with another one. Got it thanks. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's a Federal ruling, but it only applies to California and Prop 8.
I wish the ruling did have immediate nationwide applicability, but it doesn't. Unless, of course, there is something I'm missing...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, if it stands, it will serve as a good precedent everywhere.
The ruling is based on Federal guarantees of equal rights. If the appellants are found not to have standing, as the judge indicates, the ruling will stand, and become a precedent that will be considered and cited in other cases.

It won't have an immediate effect, but it could have a very important effect in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Technically
One would have to bring suit in each state. Typically, once it is deemed to be "correct" states will tend to just follow it. Desegregation was a bit like this. Once school districts started losing in large numbers, they tended to try to change without being sued. It isn't instantaneous by any stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's true. It won't happen overnight.
Personally, I wish we had a better SCOTUS, so a case could be brought using the full faith and credit issue to force all states to recognize gay marriages from any state.

It'll all happen, but not fast enough for some couples, who still may not be able to marry in their lifetimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. although it only applies to CA
I wonder if it could be fought nationally as Prop 8 was struck down due to a conflict with the US Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will red states have to recognize the marriages granted in other states now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not yet, unfortunately. That case needs a different SCOTUS,
I think. It should be the case, though. Eventually it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC