Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holey shit....a caller on C-span just said what I wanted to say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:26 AM
Original message
Holey shit....a caller on C-span just said what I wanted to say
And said it so well.
That basically the Military Industrial Complex was a beast that had to be fed and that the gust (from the Heritage Foundation) was purposing perpetual war.
Who ever you were you nailed it brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. For roughly 70 years
no politician has ever been able to spend "too much" on defense. It simply could not be done. No politician could survive the charge of being "soft on defense". Thus we have the largest military on the planet. Once you have it, the temptation to use it is far too large.

We as a nation would be far better served by a vastly smaller military. A 50% cut would be a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The answer to the problem is not popular.
But a return to the conscripted military of the past.
We can all see the need for a military but one that is of the people and for the people and by the people. This is not what we have now with a privatized military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I got my butt thoroughly stomped for suggesting exactly that
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 08:27 AM by Jackpine Radical
a couple of weeks ago.

Here, if you want to review the bloodshed:
http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8825334&mesg_id=8825334

I was a draftee in Vietnam, and I think a draft army has historically been one of the best checks on military excesses. You can maybe get an 18 year-old kid to do almost anything (e.g. My Lai), but you have a lot of trouble convincing the parents to vote for a politician who wants to send their kids into the meat grinder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh I know the dangers of saying what is a reality.
But they somehow convinced a lot of people to buy the All Volunteer military.
What it really did was sell the military to private enterprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. you are correct the draft should have been used since 2000....
but we know why they did`t...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I agree and would go further -
Compulsory military or public service work for two years.

Everyone serves. If you don't like the military, fine, you can work in a free clinic or help rehab limited income housing.

Everyone has skin in the game as a nation. Just like those lousy fucking Swiss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, I have long thought that was a good idea.
Combine that with free access to higher education for all who want it and can do the work, and you might have the beginnings of a decent society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yep. Decent.
Good word for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Eisenhower wanted to add "congressional" to that term
but was talked out of it.
It would have been so much more stinging and true had he said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Eisenhower was a smart man.
And I think probably a genuinely good man that understood the military better than anyone. You would think we would heed his warnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Eisenhower
I always like to use the term "military industrial congressional complex" in conversation. I think it makes me look smart and well informed.

Actually, I got it from a guy on Bill Moyers journal, who's name I forgot, that was an expert on the subject and what he said was really impressive. It is the most correct term to describe the beast.

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I saw that Bill Moyer program.
He has done some great stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. That was a particularly good call, wasn't it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It was good for me.
Because that is exactly what I would have said had I got the chance....but I probably would have flubbed it and he didn't.
It gives me hope to know that there are people out there that understand things the way I do....without them I would feel nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC