Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT's Collins: "how women got the right"..."The great...roadblock to progress was..the U.S. Senate"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:58 AM
Original message
NYT's Collins: "how women got the right"..."The great...roadblock to progress was..the U.S. Senate"
My Favorite August

By GAIL COLLINS

The story in American history I most like to tell is the one about how women got the right to vote 90 years ago this month. It has everything. Adventure! Suspense! Treachery! Drunken legislators!
But, first, there was a 70-year slog.

Which is really the important part. We always need to remember that behind almost every great moment in history, there are heroic people doing really boring and frustrating things for a prolonged period of time.

That great suffragist and excellent counter, Carrie Chapman Catt, estimated that the struggle had involved 56 referendum campaigns directed at male voters, plus “480 campaigns to get Legislatures to submit suffrage amendments to voters, 47 campaigns to get constitutional conventions to write woman suffrage into state constitutions; 277 campaigns to get State party conventions to include woman suffrage planks, 30 campaigns to get presidential party campaigns to include woman suffrage planks in party platforms and 19 campaigns with 19 successive Congresses.”
And you thought health care reform was a drawn-out battle.

The great, thundering roadblock to progress was — wait for the surprise — the U.S. Senate. All through the last part of the 19th century and into the 20th, attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution ran up against a wall of conservative Southern senators.
So the women decided to win the vote by amending every single state constitution, one by one.

-snip-
Ninety years ago this month, all eyes turned to Tennessee, the only state yet to ratify with its Legislature still in session. The resolution sailed through the Tennessee Senate. As it moved on to the House, the most vigorous opposition came from the liquor industry, which was pretty sure that if women got the vote, they’d use it to pass Prohibition. Distillery lobbyists came to fight, bearing samples.
“Both suffrage and anti-suffrage men were reeling through the hall in an advanced state of intoxication,” Carrie Catt reported.

The women and their allies knew they had a one-vote margin of support in the House. Then the speaker, whom they had counted on as a “yes,” changed his mind.
(I love this moment. Women’s suffrage is tied to the railroad track and the train is bearing down fast when suddenly. ...)
Suddenly, Harry Burn, the youngest member of the House, a 24-year-old “no” vote from East Tennessee, got up and announced that he had received a letter from his mother telling him to “be a good boy and help Mrs. Catt.”
“I know that a mother’s advice is always the safest for a boy to follow,” Burn said, switching sides.


We celebrate Women’s Suffrage Day on Aug. 26, which is when the amendment officially became part of the Constitution. But I like Aug. 18, which is the day that Harry Burn jumped up in the Tennessee Legislature, waving his mom’s note from home. I told the story once in Atlanta, and a woman in the audience said that when she was visiting her relatives in East Tennessee, she had gone to put a yellow rose on Harry Burn’s grave.

I got a little teary.

“Well, actually,” she added, “it was because I couldn’t find his mother.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/opinion/14collins.html?src=me&ref=general
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Southern senators a roadblock to progress...who'd a thunk it?
Some things never change. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Conservative Southern senators" - always have been the impediments to progress in this country and
always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. "The Great Roadblock To Progress" in fairness to the Senate, that has always been their motto.
And will be until the "greatest deliberative body in the world" is finally done away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. And, the distillers turned out to be right about prohibition NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Amazing it passed at all, given the near religious use of liquor by politicians...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No - prohibition came before women's suffrage
Prohibition was the 18th amendment, enacted in January 1919. Women's suffrage was the 20th, proposed in June 1919 and enacted over a year later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oops... my bad
I know the order in some states was suffrage then prohibition, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. power concedes nothing without a fight. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. It was also the "Southern Gentlemen" that stalled
our Declaration of Independence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Iron Jawed Angels"
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 12:16 PM by yowzayowzayowza
http://iron-jawed-angels.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Jawed_Angels

Pretty good for a Hollywood treatment of the suffrage movement.

eta - direct link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. What j@cka$$ unrec'd this?
Dayum. I was reading, it had 13 recs. Got interrupted, then came back to read & rec. and now it has 12?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. So they didn't blame the President for it and give up?
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC