Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawsuit over Geronimo's remains dismissed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 06:32 PM
Original message
Lawsuit over Geronimo's remains dismissed
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local-beat/Geronimos-Fam-Cant-Sue-Feds-Yale-of-Skull--Bones-100352779.html

Geronimo’s Fam Can’t Sue Feds, Yale of Skull & Bones

By LEANNE GENDREAU
Updated 12:15 PM EDT, Tue, Aug 10, 2010

The battle between descendants of Geronimo, Yale University and a secret society over who has the famous Apache warrior’s bones is over, at least for now.

Apache’s descendants claimed that a Yale University Skull and Bones, an elusive secret society, stole some of Geronimo’s remains from a burial plot at Fort Sill, Oklahoma in 1918. Last year, 20 of them filed a suit in Washington, D.C. and a federal judge has dismissed it.

It is rumored that Prescott Bush -- father of George H.W. Bush and grandfather to George W. Bush -- was involved in taking the remains from Geronimo’s grave and bringing them back to their society in New Haven, a claim that has been disputed for some time.

In the lawsuit, the family named President Barack Obama, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Secretary of the Army Pete Geren as defendants because Geronimo’s remains are the property of the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. At this late date how could they prove anything?
I'd love to see the Geronimo descendants awarded a bundle from these pricks, but there's no way they could convince a jury exactly WHO stole the remains.

I have no idea why the judge dismissed the suit but I doubt it had much chance of success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "a bundle"
They are not hoping for a bundle of money. They want Geronimo's remains. The S&B "fellows" robbed his grave, put his remains on display in their "club house," and bragged about it for years.

The judge clearly erred when he identified the 1990 NABPAR law as applying only to items acquired since its inactment. There have been numerous situations where institutions that get federal dollars have been forced to return SacredObjects and human remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please don't think I'm defending these creeps
And admittedly I don't know all there is to know about this story. But there are a few things that I believe are pertinent that aren't addressed in this news article, like, has anyone outside of this "club" ever actually seen the skeletal remains in question? Have they been examined to determine whether or not they do in fact contain DNA common to the living descendants of Geronimo? Have the Ft Sill authorities ever determined that the grave of Geronimo was vandalized and the remains removed? Did this incident really take place or is it merely and attempt by a bunch of pampered snobs to show how brave they are?

I'm as indignant as anybody over incidents like this one, especially since there is a fair chance that my paternal grandmother who died in 1919 when my father was 2 was supposed to have been a member of the Ft Sill Chiricahua Warm Springs Apache tribe.

But I'm really not sure there is any there there. From my attempts to trace my grandmother I can tell you that those records leave an awful lot to be desired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, I know
that you are definitely not defending the grave robbers.

Goyaale' (aka Geronimo) was, of course, a powerful leader. There is no question that someone removed his remains from his grave. His family has been attempting to have his remains returned for reburial since shortly after the creeps robbed his grave.

The S&BS has no legal right to "own" any Native Americans' remains. The 1990 federal law mandates that any institution or group that gets any federal funding must return any/all Native American remains to the appropriate tribal group.

I remember when we were working with government representatives on the wording and goals of the legislation. Several museum-types were in a huff. A spokesman said, "Well, you people can't say exactly who these remains belong to." Chief Oren Lyons responded, "That may be true. But I can definitely say for sure who they don't belong to -- you."

Many non-indians are unaware of how common it was for ghouls to rob Indian graves in the early-to-mid-1900s. A dentist in Washington (state), for example, desired the skull of Hinmuuttu-Yalatlat, or Chief Joseph. He paid a freak to steal it from his grave. The dentist used the skull of this Holy Man for an ashtray in his den. It has never been returned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do these people have remains of anybody - let alone
He remains of someone with living family members?

Give back the remains and keep old
Nazi prescott's bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. strange how there could be any question at all about a family
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 09:14 PM by G_j
getting back the stolen remains of a family member.


"Judge Richard Roberts last month granted a Justice Department motion to dismiss, saying the plaintiffs failed to establish that the government had waived its right not to be sued without its consent.

He also dismissed the lawsuit against Yale and the society, saying the plaintiffs cited a law that only applies to Native American cultural items excavated or discovered after 1990."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just out of curiosity, was the judge a Bush appointee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. or a yalie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC