Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

69, or What Difference Can a Democratic Supermajority Make?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 09:14 PM
Original message
69, or What Difference Can a Democratic Supermajority Make?
I. 73rd U.S. Congress: Simple Democratic Majority

During FDR’s first two years in office, Democrats held a majority of the seats in Congress, but not a supermajority. At the time, two-thirds of Senators had to vote for cloture (the number was decreased in the 1970s to 60). With just 59-63 Democratic Senators (the number varied over time), Dems did not have enough votes to push through progressive legislation. The exception? Banking reform. The Wall Street Crash of 1929 (and the bank runs that followed) was that era’s 9/11. To do nothing about the banking crisis would have been like folding our hands on 9/12/2001 and murmuring “It’s God’s will.” The 73rd U.S. Congress passed some important financial regulation, in particular Glass-Steagall which prohibited commercial banks from engaging in risky financial speculation. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ensured that Americans would not be deprived of their life’s savings through no fault of their own.

II. 74th U.S. Congress: 69 Senate Democrats

What a difference 69 votes made. The 74th U.S. Congress tackled a wide array of problems including

Labor . Up until FDR, union busting was a more less sanctioned activity in the U.S. And I mean busting . Employers hired armed thugs to beat (and kill) union organizers. Some of these thugs were members of the police or the army. Union members were blacklisted. If you wanted to keep your job and keep food on the family table, you kept your mouth shut and replied “Yes, sir!” when spoken to.

http://wapedia.mobi/en/History_of_union_busting_in_the_United_States

The 74th Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act. It set up the National Labor Relations Board. It made blacklisting union members and interfering with union activities (including voting) illegal.

Social Security . Up until FDR, smart folks put aside a little bit of their earnings to save for retirement or illness---if they were lucky enough to have jobs that paid more than a subsistence wage and if the Banksters did not fritter away their hard earned savings, in which case they were shit out of luck. Social Security changed that. Now, the federal government helped people save. If the worst happened----early death, disability---at least you would not starve on the street. There was also Aid to Families with Dependent Children.

The original Social Security Act was not perfect. Women and minorities were largely excluded. Over the decades, the act was modified several times. People who are dissatisfied with the first round of Health Care Reform (and if you read my journals, you know that I think it far from perfect) might want to remember that it is easier to correct problems with an existing program than to create that program in the first place. Often the most important first step is acknowledging that people have a right to health care---or food to eat or a bed in which to sleep.

Sometimes, a gesture means a lot. The 74th passed the Revenue Act of 1935, a novel bill that raised taxes on the nation’s wealthy. Imagine that! Expecting those folks who lead lifestyles of the rich and famous to help out their less fortunate brothers!

The 74th decided that the federal government had a right---and obligation---to help with projects such as flood control and electricity for rural areas.

The 74th decided that people hired by federal government contractors had a right to a minimum wage and overtime. If Big Business wanted a share of corporate welfare, it would have to let more than the shit trickle down.

If a 69 vote Democratic majority could do all that, imagine what an even larger majority---a supermajority---could accomplish.

III. 75th U.S. Congress: 76 Senate Democrats

The 75th Congress protected consumers by outlawing deceptive trade practices. The 75th created the FDA and gave the federal government the power---and obligation---to keep our food supply and our medications safe. If not for the FDA, our milk would probably be as melamine laced as China’s. Our mascara might still cause blindness. Your antibiotics might (still) contain diethylene glycol---anything to keep manufacturers costs down and profits high!

The FDA is not perfect. We have seen how private industry can infiltrate the agency, compromising public health. But at least we have criminal penalties for businessmen who repeatedly, knowingly try to kill us. That was a lot more than our great great grandparents had.

Most important of all, the 75th Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act. Again, this was a bill that was not perfect at its inception. Over the years it has been modified numerous times---to prohibit age discrimination, to prohibit sex discrimination. However, this bill was an important first start. In the past, it was up to industry to pay whatever it felt like paying---even if its employees starved or worked under brutal conditions that killed them.

The 75th Congress decided that the American worker was more than just a cog in some corporate machine to be used and discarded. It declared that workers were important and had rights, too.

The 75th Congress decided that the nation’s children were more than just miniature cogs in some corporate machine to be used and discarded to supplement Mom and Dad’s pitiful salaries. It set the minimum age for most jobs at 16 and for hazardous work at 18---this seems so basic that it is hard to believe that tiny children once slaved away in factories.

The number of children under the age of 15 who worked in industrial jobs for wages climbed from 1.5 million in 1890 to 2 million in 1910. Businesses liked to hire children because they worked in unskilled jobs for lower wages than adults, and their small hands made them more adept at handling small parts and tools. Children were seen as part of the family economy. Immigrants and rural migrants often sent their children to work, or worked alongside them. However, child laborers barely experienced their youth. Going to school to prepare for a better future was an opportunity these underage workers rarely enjoyed. As children worked in industrial settings, they began to develop serious health problems. Many child laborers were underweight. Some suffered from stunted growth and curvature of the spine. They developed diseases related to their work environment, such as tuberculosis and bronchitis for those who worked in coal mines or cotton mills. They faced high accident rates due to physical and mental fatigue caused by hard work and long hours.



http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/hine-photos/

For decades the nation had tried to regulate child labor, but it took 76 Democratic Senators---a supermajority---to do it.


The 75th was not perfect. A popular bill to outlaw lynching was shot down by Southern Democrats. Luckily, that was not the last Democratic Supermajority of the 20th Century.

IV. The 88th Congress: 66 Senate Democrats

In case you think that only something as catastrophic as the Great Depression could light a fire under Congress, I present the 88th and 89th Congresses and their achievements under LBJ.

LBJ was a protégé of FDR. He cut his teeth on New Deal politics. He knew that it was possible to change this country. So, when he stepped in to fill Kennedy’s shoes, he decided to spearhead some truly impressive reforms.

The 88th Congress brought us:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964

Once the Act was implemented, its effects were far-reaching and had tremendous long-term impacts on the whole country. It prohibited discrimination in public facilities, in government, and in employment, invalidating the Jim Crow laws in the southern U.S. It became illegal to compel segregation of the races in schools, housing, or hiring.
Powers given to enforce the act were initially weak, but were supplemented during later years. Congress asserted its authority to legislate under several different parts of the United States Constitution, principally its power to regulate interstate commerce under Article One (section 8), its duty to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment and its duty to protect voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

Southern Dems hated this one. They fought long and hard ( two month filibuster). But it passed.

Just this would be enough to make Americans remember the 88th Congress fondly. But they did not stop there. We also got The Clean Air Act, Food Stamps (yes, we all have a right to eat) and Head Start.

V. The 89th Congress: 67 Senate Democrats

By the time 1965 rolled around, Congress was on a roll. The 89th Congress brought us:

Medicare and Medicaid. You think the (ongoing) fight for universal health reform has been hard? Back in the 1960s, plenty of people predicted the end of life as we know it in this country if the nation’s elderly, disabled and poor were not allowed to die in the streets the way that God intended them.

Extra federal funding for poor schools. Integration was not enough. Some southern states simply stopped funding public schools and sent their whites to private “academies.” If everyone was going to get a chance at a decent education, the federal government had to follow up with cash.

The Voting Rights Act . We bitch and moan about election fraud committed by corporate America and the GOP. How many of us remember that you could get killed for attempting to vote while Black prior to 1965? Poll Taxes, Literacy Tests---these were facts of life all across the South. The Constitution guaranteed equal rights for all regardless of race, but the Feds had not attempted to enforce that law in years---until LBJ and the 89th Congress.

HUD was created, based upon the (novel for the time) principle that everyone deserved a home. Federal motor vehicle emissions standards were set in an effort to clean up our air. Car were made safer, too, so that less of us would die in car crashes. We got a Freedom of Information Act, we got warning labels on our cigarettes (the Southern Blue Dogs must have hated that), we got cleaner/safer highways and more funding for colleges.

VI. In case you are still convinced that a Democratic supermajority is no different from a Republican majority...

Consider the crowning achievement of the GOP controlled 83rd Congress (under Eisenhower) which banned the Communist Party (?!) a law that no one even tries to enforce, probably for fear that it would be struck down like a tree in a lightening storm. And then there was the 108th Congress, again with a Republican majority under a Republican president, George W. Bush. The 108th’s claims to fame include tax cuts for the rich and Medicare Part D (the drug company giveaway act).

No wonder the corporate media wants you to believe that “60 Votes Don’t matter”. They are scared to death of what might happen if the Dems get 65 or 70 Senate seats. What new wrongs might be righted? What corporate profits might be slashed? How many Americans might be persuaded that voting is not a waste of time? The Employee Free Choice Act. A national single payer option. Don't dismiss these as pipe dreams.

We do not see faith, hope, and charity as unattainable ideals, but we use them as stout supports of a nation fighting the fight for freedom in a modern civilization.

FDR


Have always been and will always be a Democrat. :dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. A hearty Kick and Recommend
Edited on Wed Aug-18-10 10:31 PM by MilesColtrane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. you really have`t a clue do you.....
oh well, i`m getting my social security check every 2nd tuesday of the month. i`ll get this till the month after i die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But...but...you aren't saving!
That damn ponzi scheme taught you to blow all your money! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. hard to save when my trade was sold overseas to the lowest bidder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yeah, that drop off in the savings rate has everything to do with SS and nothing to do with...
the inexorable drop in real wages doesn't it?

Did it ever occur to you that the reason people save less is because they have less, not because they think they're gonna suck at the fat government teat in their golden years?


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I want facts..link? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Facts? "We don need no steenkin facts", because Rush tells us so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. You bought the FOX Faux News hook, line and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Are you talking about the SS in the US? Better get some reading.........
.......materials really quick before somebody just eats you fucking alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Yeah! It's another tax! Dam gummint!
They just take it and give it to welfare queens to have lezbo babbys an eat cavier while they all get blow jobs from Nanny Pelosi!

Why exactly are you here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. I would loosen that tin foil hat. I think you screwed it on way too tight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. Sigh.
Where to begin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. You are wrong of course, but don't let that stop you from spewing BS.
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. Man, you really are stupid aren't you?
Stop repeating the stuff talking heads tell you and do some of your own research. We're solvent until 2043, and that's if we do nothing.

Buy a clue dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. You are wrong.
It has been documented that you are wrong.

Please quit lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Hmmm. Late. Does that mean the pizza is free? It's that way with Domino's, right? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. So what? There is a depression, created by Wall Street, that has an anchor tied around everyone's
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 08:06 PM by w4rma
income. If the payroll tax is bringing in less money this year it is because of Wall Street greed. Increase everyone's wages, and it will bring in more and everyone will be taking home more and spending more and people will start saving again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. sometimes i wonder what the hell happened...
i guess we did`t try hard enough or we just gave up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Me too
Will always be a democrat.

Whenever we dems get our shit together, we change the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleGirl Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for the history lesson
I'm just starting to appreciate history and have this appetite for it now. I'm happy to read that Dems have made this country not only civil, but right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm doubting the Democrats have the interest in voting for their constituents
and that not having a supermajority or even a majority might be their preferred stealth victim mode. So, I'm voting straight Dem this fall, just to spite them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry Ogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Your describing a paradox of which most people refuse to believe,
and what is even more unbelievable is the following... The predator class is relentless, remarkably deceptive and their influence is well entrenched within the American psyche, and by being allowed to play the game of politics and by not being held accountable for their decades of crime - they have reduced our two party system into a rigged illusion and pretend democracy that panders to, believe it or not, the predator class... And for our modern day "elected officials" ignorance has become the facade of complicity. So it would be nice if they didn't have anyone too blame the fleecing of the working class on but themselves. So, I too will vote straight Dem this fall, just to spite them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. That just goes to show anyone, that it's not just the votes that count..........
..........It's the fucking "balls" that go along with the votes. The Democratic party has been neutered after 1970 and no longer has any "balls".


Excellent article SHOWING that it takes the goddamn WILL and votes to get your agenda passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. But the Republicans only needed 51 Senate votes to pass their legislation, not 69, 76, 66 or 67!
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 09:00 AM by Better Believe It
Why is that?

"In case you are still convinced that a Democratic supermajority is no different from a Republican majority..."

It is different! Republicans only need 51 Senate votes to get their crap passed and according to some, Democrats now need a super-duper majority, at least 66 and perhaps as many as 76votes, in order to accomplish anything significant.

I'll see your 76 and raise you to 90 votes. That should be enough.

What's wrong with this picture?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. And Reagan
Everything that Reagan did was passed by a Democratic House and a Senate with either a slim Dem or GOP majority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. And George W. Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daninmo Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Bush too
Everything he signed off his last two years was passed by Reid and Polosi, a democratic ran house and senate. Why can't we get stuff done when we own all three branches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. So go vote for your 3rd party then.
We know you're gonna do it anyway. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:42 PM
Original message
That's a pretty obvious strawman. Your comment has nothing to do with the points raised.

Can you indicate what you points you disagree with and why?

I'm listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. I responded to a strawman with a strawman. Big whoop. nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. You have nothing to refute my observation. Fair enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Why do you (and others) keep perpetuating the myth that Bush got passed whatever he wanted?
He ONLY got passed the tax cuts with 51 votes, because tax cuts (and tax increases/spending cuts/spending increases) are what can be passed under budget reconciliation, which only required 51 votes.

On the things Bush needed 60 votes for (like ANWR drilling, Social Security private accounts, and Immigration), he failed at all three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. He got two of the most reactionary Supreme Court justices in history on the court ....

when Republicans threatened to use the Constitutional Option to stop any Democratic filibusters (the pretend kind or real ones) against his picks.

The Democrats folded in the face of that threat.

Did you forget about that?

You wrote: "He ONLY got passed the tax cuts with 51 votes because tax cuts are what can be passed under budget reconciliation, which only required 51 votes."

That's not exactly correct. He got his tax cuts passed with more than 51 votes. In fact, his tax cuts had bi-partisan support!
12 Democratic Senators joined 46 Republicans in voted for the bill and 7 other Democratic Senators didn't even bother to cast an up or down vote on the tax cuts for the rich! It passed 58 to 33.

The vote in the House of Representatives wasn't much better. 28 Democrats joined Republicans in voting for the legislation which gave Bush the votes he needed for passage, 240 to 154 with 29 Democrats not even bothering to vote on the bill!

You wrote: "On the things Bush needed 60 votes for (like ANWR drilling, Social Security private accounts, and Immigration), he failed at all three."

Again, that's not correct. The Senate voted to approve oil drilling in ANWR in March, 2005. The vote was 51 to 49 when it was included as a provision in the federal budget. However, the House did not pass ANWR.

Senate Votes to Open Oil Drilling in ANWR
Wednesday, March 16, 2005

WASHINGTON — A closely divided Senate voted to approve oil drilling in an Alaska wildlife refuge, a major victory for President George W. Bush (search) and a stinging defeat for environmentalists who have fought the idea for decades.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150628,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. The Democrats respect the outcome of elections ...
... and the GOP does not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. If that were really true, the Bush tax cuts would have been made permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. So the tax cuts for the rich were only good for a decade, or maybe not. That's huge!
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 02:56 PM by Better Believe It

Now you have to admit, that's a pretty lame excuse in defense of the George W. Bush tax cuts.

The Democrats stopped the cuts from lasting forever, or at least until the year 3814 by "winning" a 10 year
"sunset" clause if, and it's a big if, the Democratic controlled Senate votes to end the Bush tax cuts .... and they might not!

Oh goody!

And it was passed with only 47 Republican Senate votes. 11 Democrats voted for it and 7 Democratic Senators didn't vote at all!
Only 33 Democratic Senators voted against the Bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
46. "the Democratic controlled Senate votes to end the Bush tax cuts .... and they might not!"
Are you serious?

The Democrats don't need any votes. They don't even need to set a vote. Without any action, they will end automatically next year.

In order to EXTEND the Bush tax cuts, there needs to be 60 votes in the Senate, 218 in the House, and a Presidential signature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. I'm not defending the Bush tax cuts.
I'm only saying that the Republicans did not have the votes to make them permanent. They wanted to. So they had to settle for a sunset provision to avoid a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Crap, maybe, but the real GOP agenda that was never passed was much worse.
Much of the damage done during the Bush administration came from executive decree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. They were rewarded for getting it DONE
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 10:40 AM by txlibdem
The story would have been quite different if the Dems loaded down every piece of legislation with loopholes for the rich and suck-ass "ideas" from the Republicons.

Why is it too fking difficult for the current administration and congressional Dems to figure out.

Give us bullet point "achievements" that fall apart when you look too deeply into the specifics OR do the fking right thing!!!

Get the goddamn job done and you will be rewarded, Dems. Keep going as you are and you will all be tossed out on your ears.

Edited for typo and to expand the point: get it done. "Get er done!" as some would prefer to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
32. K&R
Well done. Thanks for the great info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. Excellent history lesson. Yet today there is a much bigger and more complicated picture.
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 03:36 PM by ooglymoogly

...............A FAIRYTALE of RELATIVITY..................

The problems facing democrats today are of course, different;
The plans of mice and men, becoming far more deadly.

The shadows of a shadow government have moved relentlessly, over the decades, unstopped; Self correcting as it plunders;

Machiavellian plans that are now exquisite to a thread;
A growing force that has bullied its way, with ever stickier fingers onto the strings of power;

Providing this metastasizing cabal with fortunes so vast they are uncountable and uncontrollable. They have frightened us, the robbed, into believing we have no other options but those handed down.

These enemies, of which I speak, are known pretty much to all of us; They have become far more sophisticated. Setting in place contingency after contingency, as each threat has been identified; One by one castrating the forces that could take them down in a heartbeat; Backups for any perceived threat that might stop their race to dystopia;

That Elysian garden meant to be exclusive to the very few; While outside its formidable walls; Fascism, jackboots and kangaroo justice to eliminate any possible crumb of decent or threat to its power.

What are these forces that could stop this march to a corporate oligarchy they so relentlessly seek.

Hmmmmmm

The fourth estate, The crown jewel to a free and democratic civilization and vital to a Democratic and Republican party to maintain each as one of the checks and balances and is one of the legs that holds a democracy up; The means to keep our government in check and honest; To protect us from what is in fact happening; A press with constitutionally protected power that could easily stop its blatant march to fascism;

Well that check no longer exists. The ruling elite have bought that check; That very dangerous threat, that could stop their march in its tracks;
They bought it lock stock and barrel and no longer fear exposure of their crimes.

Congress, the most important set of checks and balances; The power meant by the constitution to stop treason against it; That should have stopped them in their tracks long ago;

And yes you guessed it;

They bought that too and the justice within, that could easily terminate them with the simple application of the law;

That takeover turned out to be cheaper and easier than a whore on the docks; A purchase that, over the decades has paid gazillion % dividends; Fleecing the governed in revolving credit and ponzi schemes; Thereby bringing congress under control and into complicity;
Once more eliminating another threat.

Finally we come to the Democratic party

The Democratic party, perhaps, after the MSM plum dropped in their pocket, is the most dangerous threat of all; A Democratic party with a sufficient majority could stop them and bring their march to Dystopia to a full stop; As it has many times before; Likely this time, with crimes so vast, putting them in jail for treason or worse;

Bringing everything back into balance under the constitution.

So how did they overcome that threat.

The taking over of the Democratic party was a more difficult task; One that needed pure and deadly deception to go with the buyout. The one thing that most, had to be done to keep them from angry mobs and perhaps the guillotine; Though now feeling absolutely safe with no MSM to expose their treachery

And so, heads together, they did it, brazenly and without detection or comment from their very own msm who instead helped them with shovel fulls of propaganda heaped in drowning piles to further their cause.

The big fuck?

The big deception that would protect them from this much bigger and more frightening threat; To put the world back together and put them in prison?

The simplest of tricks that could never have happened under a free press.

The oh so simple trick of running pugs as dems and making sure; Enough corporatist Dinos were in place to stop any mounting of the barricades, or legislation against them that might cause this house of cards to be blown away and land them in prison.

once again, success;

Thus castrating the most dangerous force that could smash them in a few well placed blows by the constitution;

And thus, they have minimized the Democratic party to meaningless that is for all intents a purposes, no different from the more innately corrupted pugs.

The rest was simple

The Neocons, (corporatists all) the brains of the ruling class, in a pincer move, joining forces with its symbiotic partners, the intelligence agencies (the state dpt) both military and civilian; Together, have joined forces with ready made legions, cleaved to hypocrite televangelists; In pimp like pirouette; Eagerly and generously supplying them to this cabal and their surrogates, the wannabee pugs;

Legions held together by no more than a bunch of hypocrites and soulless hucksters, Falwell, Roberts et al; Of the "Ah haa'uv si'unnd" crowd; Who, if nothing else, know how to manipulate the not so bright, the scorned and the disillusioned in earshot of the tube; Flocking to them like geese to the south, to hear the delusions and propaganda offered in limitless blasphemies; And only for a tithe.

Coming like flies to honey, seeking some relevance in life; And these "televangelists" told them what they were desperate to hear; "They are relevant"; Making hucksters rich and powerful, who would masterfully subjugated them through the filter of the pugs, to the tiny group they are relevant to; The no longer in the shadows government, the new cabal of the ruling class, made up from this country and others; With the generous bonus, making them believe, wars would save them; The recipe for the disasters that followed.

In ever more brazen moves; These craven few have systematically bought all the things that could protect us from their greed and that could easily destroy them;

And under the very nose of a government that, in all honesty, should have stopped these deathblows to freedom and democracy long ago;

And has become the near unstoppable panoply that we are up against, relentlessly building, unchecked for its crimes, self correcting without interference from justice; Building inexorably from an assassination and each of its mounting successes.

And the only tools we have to stop them, Are the internet and exposing them and the Dinos in our midst for what they are.

It is not comforting to realize, none of this could have taken place without the systematic deregulation of our safeguards, fully knowing the outcome and its consequences that were and are, all to obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC