Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Unemployment Claims SURGE, Hit Highest Level Since November 2009

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:35 AM
Original message
New Unemployment Claims SURGE, Hit Highest Level Since November 2009
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/19/new-unemployment-claims-s_n_687420.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- New applications for unemployment insurance reached the half-million mark last week for the first time since November, a sign that employers are likely cutting jobs again as the economy slows.

The Labor Department said Thursday that initial claims for jobless benefits rose by 12,000 last week to 500,000, the fourth increase in the past five weeks. Wall Street economists forecast that claims would drop.

The four-week average, a less volatile measure, rose by 8,000 to 482,500, the highest since December. There were no special factors that distorted the numbers, a Labor Department analyst said.

The increase suggests the economy is creating even fewer jobs than in the first half of this year, when private employers added an average of about 100,000 jobs per month. That's barely enough to keep the unemployment rate from rising. The jobless rate has been stuck at 9.5 percent for two months.

Stock futures fell on the news. The Dow Jones industrial average futures had risen more than 50 points before the report was released. They dropped quickly and were down as much as 20 points afterward.

More at the link ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Surprise!!! Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Don't you just love these "unexpected" surprises?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. We don't need no stinkin' jobs!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a shockk...here is a way the states...at least mine..post such high employment rates
Texas has an 8.4 rate-above the national average.They have cut hours and benefits on most of the non-managerial people I know.I see the uninsured rate increasing even more-we already lead the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daylan b Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What numbers are you using?
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 09:52 AM by daylan b
Texas has followed the national unemployment rate but has been a full percentage point below it, not above it, since Fall 08.

The national rate hasn't been as low as 8.4 since the first part of 09.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. well-I meant unemployment-sorry-it's smoke and mirrors-underemployment
and being screwed by the elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daylan b Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Edit: Oh, you meant higher as in lower
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 10:30 AM by daylan b
I understood you to mean higher unemployment in the traditional sense.

BTW, the idea you are speaking of is far from unique to Texas and Texas is still better off than most states in that stat as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. read at your leisure.
http://www.cppp.org/files/8/423_SOWT.pdf

THE STATE OF WORKING TEXAS 2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daylan b Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm aware of that report, it's part of what made me question your original reply
Yet it doesn't support what you are claiming. All states have the underemployment issue you mentioned earlier, it's not unique to Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NikRik Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. need help from feds !
Untill a massive program simular to the New Deal is quickly put into action Iam afraid employment will come to late for most of those who have been unemployed for to long already and that includes me!It seems that at 53 years old Iam not even considered when I apply for a job.All the 20-30 something's get any job B/4 they would consider a man of my age.Then the bigger problem is all of the jobs available are part time only, I need a full time job in order to pay my bills and keep a roof over my families head. Even thou Iam 53,I have a 15 year old daughter and a 13 year old boy. Will this nightmare ever end ??? ;(
NikRik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. they extended unemployment for thousands who had stopped receiving it
of course the number went up.

But I guess you'd rather be sensational than honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. .
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. It looks like the article says initial claims rose. I take that to mean people who have not ...
previously been receiving benefits, not those whose benefits were cut off during the delay in extending UI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Unemployment benefits have absolutely NOTHING to do with unemployment rate.
If you are willing and able to work and have looked for work in last 4 weeks then you are unemployed for the purpose of U-3.

You can be unemployed and not get benefits. Punch your boss in the face I guarantee you will be unemployed (and join the U-3 stats) but never see a dime in Unemployment insurance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattleblue Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. This is NEW unemployment claims.
Not renewal of old ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh boy. Jobless recovery. Works great for plutocrats. Little people can go screw themselves.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. This kind of news sure makes a lot of DU'ers happy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Only in that we hope it will wake people up and put some pressure on our lawmakers to do more.
The fact is there are a lot of out here living the reality of the situation and we do prefer the truth be told about it. The current message from our lawmakers sounds a lot like they are telling us we just have to sit and wait patiently while the inadequate steps they have taken work their magic over the next few years. I think more is in order and if they are denying the gravity of the situation, they feel no urgency to do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Like REPUBLICAN lawmakers? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Republicans and the Democrats who side with them. The deficit hawks are the problem.
The Republicans, obviously, stand to benefit from bad economic news, they think. What I don't get is why any Democrat would be joining in deficit craze when it's obvious we need more spending right now. Very confusing especially as they are worried about losing independent voters and polling is showing jobs and the economy is at the top of the list of priorities for independents and spending is way down their list of concerns right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Why do you think liberals/progressives are "happy" when they lose their jobs?

Do you think they are even happier if their unemployment benefits run out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. a sad k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC