Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cameron Diaz tops list of riskiest celeb searches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:55 PM
Original message
Cameron Diaz tops list of riskiest celeb searches
SAN FRANCISCO — If you're looking for Cameron Diaz, Julia Roberts or Jessica Biel online, look out!
The movie stars top the latest list of the most dangerous celebrities to search for online, according to new research by computer-security software maker McAfee Inc.

It's far from an Oscar, but landing atop McAfee's annual list carries a distinction all its own: It means that criminals believe those celebs are the perfect lures to sucker people into visiting malicious websites.

Clicking onto strange sites is sketchy to begin with. But many people do, and their computers get infected. Once a computer is infected, criminals can steal victims' online banking passwords, e-mail passwords, and do other kinds of nasty deeds.

Attaching famous people's names to malicious sites is a well-worn ruse, to fool people looking at search results into thinking they're heading to a legitimate site.

The other most-dangerous celebrities to look for online, according to McAfee, are Gisele Bundchen, Brad Pitt, Adriana Lima, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Nicole Kidman, Tom Cruise, Heidi Klum, Penelope Cruz and Anna Paquin.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010-08-19-celebrity-searches_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. And that is why I never browse for famous names -
only porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. didnt know that. my niece had someone use her checking account number a couple
months ago. bogus check to bogus company. odd, odd. small amount of money. 40 something. and 60 something. hurt her since she doesnt have much money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jessica who?
I have a rule - If I've never heard of 'em, they ain't famous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, I can beat that - If I've never heard of them,
they don't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. One EXCELLENT tool in the battle against the scum is WOT, Web of Trust add-on
What is the Web of Trust add-on?
Web of Trust (WOT) is the world's leading community-based, free safe surfing tool that helps all web users stay safe as they search, surf and shop online. The WOT add-on tells you which sites you can trust when using Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Wikipedia and other popular sites. Web site ratings are powered by a global community of millions of trustworthy users who have rated millions of websites based on their experiences. The free add-on works with Firefox, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer and is a free download.

http://www.mywot.com/en/download

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks for the link dainbramaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks for the info
It looks like a good add-on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks, I listen to Kim Komando's show.
Edited on Thu Aug-19-10 03:12 PM by AnArmyVeteran
And a rec from her means it must be a good product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. McAfee itself is one of the most dangerous names online.
Nasty ineffective bloatware crap that it is. The enterprise stuff is not as bad, but jeez - they have some nerve to come out with a list of most dangerous search terms when THEIR SOFTWARE THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE PROTECTING THOSE PCs FAILS TO MITIGATE THE THREATS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Intel bought them today, at a 60% premium over yesterday's close
maybe their shit will work once Intel straightens it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm hoping Intel bought the name to kill it dead.
There's not much sense competing with MS now to protect Windows desktop/laptop PCs - Defender does better than McAfee or Symantec with less resource hit. For that matter, some of the free AV stuff (I guess Defender is free, with the purchase of a Win7 license...) beats the big two names from the early '00s, as well.

My last experience with McAfee (required by my employer for our Windows servers) was that it prevented us from copying an executable (pushprinterconnections.exe) to our DC so we could deploy printers with a startup script. Far more trouble than it's worth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. AVG has become bloat ware. Kaspersky or Microsoft Security essentials
The only two I use now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC