Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freedom Of Churches And Mosques Protected In...Arizona

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 08:00 AM
Original message
Freedom Of Churches And Mosques Protected In...Arizona
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/freedom-of-churches-and-mosques-protected-inarizona.php?ref=fpi

It turns out that there is a state in the union that has enacted a broad standard of religious equality that would fully allow for the development of religious community structures such as the Cordoba House in downtown New York City, without regard to the religion of the organizers. This center of enlightenment and civil libertarianism is none other than...Arizona!

That's right. The same state that passed a tough new immigration law this year, and flirted with one requiring presidential candidates to provide their birth certificates, also passed a law this year that would expand religious freedom in the matter of building houses of worship. And its conservative proponents fully acknowledge that it applies equally to Muslims as it does to Christians.

As the Arizona Republic reported:

State lawmakers strengthened churches' rights this year, passing a law that prohibits cities and towns from using zoning codes or land-use rules to restrict where religious facilities such as churches, mosques or synagogues can locate.

Planned mosques in New York, California and Tennessee have spurred community opposition recently. But any mosque planned for Arizona could build where it pleased, as long as it complied with any local zoning and building requirements that would apply to other development.

The law, considered the first of its kind, was backed by most of the Legislature's Republicans and opposed by most Democrats, who argued that it gives religious institutions preferential treatment over the concerns of cities or residents.

more at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
d_r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. So If I lived in Arizona
And I don't, I could declare my house a "church" - regardless of zoning - and pay no property tax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Have there been any mosques built there lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. According to this article a few after 9/11
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/08/18/20100818new-arizona-church-mosque-law.html

Arizona has about a dozen mosques, including a few that were built after 9/11. The two largest new facilities, the Islamic Center of the East Valley in Chandler and the Islamic Center of the Northeast Valley in Scottsdale, faced some opposition from neighbors arguing they would cause traffic problems, but the cities did not block the construction of the mosques.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Parking and traffic is the major objection to most churches these days
Edited on Fri Aug-20-10 12:58 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 is the big player here and trumps most local attempts to block things. Sometimes the objections are revenue based.

http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/233304
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't let them fool you, there is a reason behind this
Here in the valley there are a couple of Mormon temples being built or planned to be built. Mormons are numerous here so they are protecting themselves more than standing for any principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rod85 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Surprised they haven't raided 3HO yet
There's a muslim-hindu spinoff in Arizona called 3HO that built itself a Waco style fortress complex I'm surprised the Fed's haven't raided yet.

It's good to see Arizona strengthened the law to protect these religious centers. You don't see good news in property rights too often in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC