Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Board of Education member: Women didn't win suffrage - men GAVE it to them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 09:57 AM
Original message
Texas Board of Education member: Women didn't win suffrage - men GAVE it to them
If we listen to such folks as former chair of Texas School Board member Don McLeroy, we are told that majorities have given minorities power and that men have given women the right to vote

Today is the 90th anniversary of Tennessee ratifying the amendment which would give women the right to vote.

But to ever say that those in power allowed or gave any rights is disingenuous and inaccurate . This was a movement waged by women suffragists that fought long and hard for this right, not what McLeroy and others seem to imply is a privilege.


http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/10670/men-gave-women-the-right-to-vote-another-gop-myth-debunked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are right.
Sorry - I don't like it either, but no matter how hard women fought, they weren't getting jack without men signing off on it. Unless they were prepared to start killing people.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah like King George GAVE US the United States
You are buying into crap. Women worked hard, took abuse, and earned their right to vote. The men were forced to accept this right of women and it wasn't out of their kind hearts. You need to learn the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:07 AM
Original message
Excuse me, I will not be talked down to like that.
I have been studying feminism and women's issues for my entire adult life, and I know what I am talking about.

No one said anything about "the kindness of their hearts" and no one said women didn't work their asses off for the vote - what I said was, women wouldn't have gotten it without men signing off on it, and this is 100% true.

The colonists fought a brutal and bloody war to oust their British rulers and form this country - they literally forced them out.

Women fought, but the right was still gained, ultimately, through the dictators, not by ousting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think it's a matter of terminology
Woman always had the right to participate in their own governence, as did blacks, native americans, and so on. The fact that the state, run by white males, denied them the opportunity to exercise these rights doesn't mean that the rights didn't exist. That's the nature of inalienable rights.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. sorry but you have to deal with it
You made your statement and I replied to it. If you don't like my reply then sorry you don't see how far off your statement was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. ya... because women fought for it and men came to agree with women. that is fighting
for our right, not men "giving" it to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Most of them still did not *agree*
I'm not saying there was no fight here, but the right to vote was signed off on by the very men who were dead set on denying it. Women had to get their oppressors to give them the right. This isn't a matter for debate - it's just what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. but that is true with ALL things when one group has power. it dismisses all the work and fight
and struggle. without that, the men would not have signed off on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. What you're describing is the opposite of men giving sufferage to women
It's 'giving' in the same sense that the Axis 'gave' Germany to the Allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCantiGOP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. interesting article in the Smithsonian magazine
Said the temperance movement and women's suffrage were intertwined. The Prohibition proponents wanted women to vote since they would be more anti-alcohol than the male population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. and they could be militant, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. somebody cut Don's tongue off and chain him to his kitchen table


what a punk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well of course men gave it to them!
How could they have put the time in to fighting for it when they were all busy birthin those babbys and cookin up dinner an readin Good Christian Woman's Fashion magazine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. What's the matter with Texas?
THIS is!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. That's redundant. If women didn't have the vote pre-19th Amendment in a ,
particular state, then only men could vote for the institution of that Amendment, giving women suffrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC