Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Corporations, UAW International call for revote on wage cut at Indianapolis GM plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 01:31 PM
Original message
Corporations, UAW International call for revote on wage cut at Indianapolis GM plant
Edited on Fri Aug-20-10 01:33 PM by Hannah Bell
Background:

GM announced it was going to try to sell its Indianapolis stamping plant. The plant is manned by members of Local 23 of UAW. The workforce has a "successor contract" guaranteeing that they maintain their current compensation & workrules until 2015, even if the plant is sold.

JD Norman Industries is a potential buyer; but Norman wants wages cut in half as a condition of sale. Norman is a 34-year-old former JP Morgan money-man who's positioning himself as a Chinese-style contractor for the "new" US auto industry. "Chinese-style" as in low wages, no bennies, arms-length subcontractor & "plausible deniability" for the autocorps for labor violations.

In May, Local 23 of UAW voted NOT TO renegotiate their contract, 383-22. There are 650 members of Local 23, which means 59% of the membership voted not to renegotiate. Local 23's reps stood behind the vote.

This should have been the end of it, but the leadership of the UAW International (the very top brass of UAW) went behind the local's back & continued to negotiate with JD Norman to lower Local 23's wages. This move was a violation of UAW's Constitution, as well as a betrayal of the members of the local.

Then the brass called a meeting on short notice to "explain" the deal they'd negotiated (in hopes of calling a new vote & getting the result they wanted), word went out & the membership booed them out of the union hall. Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owUjzuVLY-s

But GM, Norman & the International UAW brass are still pressing to get the vote they want.


***Article****

In recent days, the United Auto Workers union, former Wall Street speculator Justin Norman and General Motors have pressed ahead with their efforts to force workers at the Indianapolis GM stamping plant to accept a 50 percent cut in wages. These forces are calling for a revote on the grounds that only a “vocal minority” of workers spoke out at last Sunday’s union meeting against the concessions demands...At a press conference Wednesday (Norman) said, “Based on the outpouring of phone calls that I have received from plant employees, I believe there is a sincere desire to listen to our offer.”

The sudden concern for the rights of workers to express themselves is ludicrous coming from Norman, a corporate front man for GM who is using the threat of mass unemployment to tear up the existing contract and blackmail workers into accepting poverty wages...Last May, workers voted by a margin of 384-22 against reopening the contract and explicitly forbade the UAW to hold further negotiations. Instead, UAW International and Region 3 officials continued talks with Norman and GM behind the backs of workers.

The UAW had planned to have workers vote to reopen their contract on Sunday, then proceed to a vote on Monday, only three days after workers were first informed of a vote. This was a violation of the UAW’s own bylaws, which specify that members must be notified fifteen days in advance of any votes scheduled to take place, workers said.

UAW officials decided to hold the meeting on a Sunday, hoping the fewest numbers of workers would attend and they could browbeat them into reopening the contract. “Many workers commute long distances to this plant, and it is far harder for most to come on Sunday than on any other day. They proceeded in this manner because they wanted a low turnout,” said Angela, a worker at the plant. Auto workers also suspect that the UAW is seeking to skew a new vote by hiring additional temporary workers, who are not facing as much of a pay cut as regular employees. “They’re trying to pad the vote,” said Todd, another worker at the plant.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/aug2010/indy-a20.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. New style democracy, keep re-running the vote until you get the result you want.
The type of democracy the very rich can really get behind.

Snarking aside, WTF is going on with the union big wigs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You ask what is happening to the big wigs........
They may be getting something under the table, GM might give then a sweet heart deal at another plant, the members still pay union dues, and the top people keep their same salaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. the bigwigs already got something, on the table, union dues are irrelevant to their futures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. kik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC