Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks strikes at DoD on Twitter ('incompetent authority')(updated to incl New Docs)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 03:37 PM
Original message
WikiLeaks strikes at DoD on Twitter ('incompetent authority')(updated to incl New Docs)
Edited on Fri Aug-20-10 03:49 PM by kpete
Source: The Hill

UPDATE - NEW DOCS

Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007-2010
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Loveparade_2010_Duisburg_planning_documents,_2007-2010

WikiLeaks strikes at DoD on Twitter
By Elise Viebeck - 08/20/10 12:29 PM ET

........................

WikiLeaks, which maintains an aggressive Twitter presence, has used its feed consistently since late July to publicize its conflict with the Defense Department.

The Pentagon, meanwhile, had not weighed in on its feed since Aug. 2.

"We are not interested in negotiating," it said Thursday morning, directing the message to the group with the hashtag #WikiLeaks.

................

WikiLeaks tweeted back less than an hour later.



"DoD's General Counsel is apparently an 'incompetent authority,'" it said, linking to the text of a letter sent from lead Pentagon attorney Jeh Charles Johnson to WikiLeaks on Aug. 16. The letter implies that the parties had been in previous contact.

..............

It also said, re-linking to the Aug. 16 letter from DoD lead counsel to WikiLeaks, that the Pentagon "wants 'total censorship,'" and that it "doesn't give a damn about Afghans."





Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/115175-provoked-wikileaks-strikes-at-dod-on-twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL. I love wikileaks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And the mouth-foaming by the armchair Rambos is a beauty to behold. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. The people of WikiLeaks had better be careful. I am afraid that if they push too hard, the
military would have no qualms about taking them out - and I do not mean out of business but out of existence.

Does anyone think there would be much outcry if Assange and others were Wellstoned?

I just hope they have set up a contingency that would blast-distribute everything they have in the event of their murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That assumes they have something of value.
they could have a tape of rape and murder and it would go away in a 7 day news cycle. Barring that they could dump another list of people for the taliban to kill or maybe operational stuff which we will just change.

You are looking for the name Gerald Bull, wellstone is a myth, Bull really got buried for fucking with things and people he should not have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. you need to think about what you wrote - I doubt that you really thing this is a good thing to do
Edited on Fri Aug-20-10 04:51 PM by karynnj
"Barring that they could dump another list of people for the taliban to kill or maybe operational stuff which we will just change."

Is this what you really recommend? From some comments, Wikileaks in some later releases redacted many Afghan names to prevent just this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes there would be much outcry. Wikileaks are regarded as world hero's by many.
Including me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hence that big encrypted file marked "insurance"
I suspect that in the event that something untoward happens to the wikileaks folks, some other anonymous parties will release the key that decrypts that file. That file, lest we forget, has been mirrored all over the world. It's classic spook insurance, and devastatingly effective (unless your "insurance" is of less value than you think.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just a couple of years ago
the phrase
maintains an aggressive Twitter presence
could not have been written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC