Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikileaks’ Assange: Character Assassination Victim - FDL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 10:17 PM
Original message
Wikileaks’ Assange: Character Assassination Victim - FDL
Wikileaks’ Assange: Character Assassination Victim
By: David Dayen Saturday August 21, 2010 6:24 pm

<snip>

So what the hell happened here? Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, was this morning a rapist on the run, with the charges in Sweden splashed across news pages everywhere. I was getting emails saying that there was always something wrong with the guy, and how in character it was for anarchists not to understand consent, and a bunch of other bunk. Then within a matter of hours, this:

Sweden has cancelled an arrest warrant for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on accusations of rape and molestation.

The Swedish Prosecution Authority website said the chief prosecutor had come to the decision that Mr Assange was not suspected of rape but did not give any further explanation.

The warrant was issued late on Friday.

Wikileaks, which has been criticised for leaking Afghan war documents, had quoted Mr Assange as saying the charges were “without basis”.

That message, which appeared on Twitter and was attributed directly to Mr Assange, said the appearance of the allegations “at this moment is deeply disturbing”.


Aside from the big mistake made by the Swedish Prosecution Authority, I’ve never seen news of a bogus charge like this fly around the world so fast. It was almost as if the subject in question had powerful enemies with the ability to make his life difficult…

Glenn Greenwald walks down the same path as me on this one:

There are a lot of lessons here, most of them obvious. In 2003, the ex-Marine and U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter — who had become one of the most persuasive opponents of the attack on Iraq, repeatedly and presciently insisting that there was no evidence of WMD — was the subject of a media smear campaign, accusing him of having engaged in criminal sex acts with adolescents. That led to commentary like this from the nation’s sleaziest bottom-feeders:

A THEORY <Jonah Goldberg>

Maybe this has already been discussed. But it seems to me this Scott Ritter kiddie-sex bust might explain Ritter’s sudden and inexplicable 180 on Iraq. Maybe they set him up in a sting? That sort of thing was standard op for the KGB. Just a thought.

Maybe one day we’ll learn that an accusation is not proof of guilt. And the Swedish authorities who validated these charges and trumpeted them to the world — only for them to be withdrawn less than 12 hours later — ought to be investigated.


You can add to this the new revelation that the Pentagon refused to work with Wikileaks in verifying redactions, after claiming that Wikileaks never contacted them. And the fact that nobody has actually come to harm, as of yet, from exposure in the Wikileaks documents. It’s hard to take seriously anything written about the organization, considering the mass of establishment support to discredit them.

<snip>

Link: http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/08/21/wikileaks-assange-character-assassination-victim/

:shrug:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. parallel...Joe Hill
Framed unionist.1920 ?
"The copper bosses framed you"....song. Paradox...Sweden issued stamp of Joe Hill.
PS update wanted on radio AAR. TKS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC