Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bernanke Must Raise Benchmark Rate 2 Points, Rajan Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 04:46 PM
Original message
Bernanke Must Raise Benchmark Rate 2 Points, Rajan Says
Lest anyone think Bernanke is not one of the good guys, in relative terms, every central bank committee has at least one guy who thinks we need to raise interest rates 2% right now. (Like the unemployed don't even exist...)

______________________

Bernanke Must Raise Benchmark Rate 2 Points, Rajan Says
By Scott Lanman and Simon Kennedy - Aug 22, 2010 7:01 PM

Raghuram Rajan accurately warned central bankers in 2005 of a potential financial crisis if banks lost confidence in each other. Now the International Monetary Fund’s former chief economist says the Federal Reserve should consider raising rates, even as almost 10 percent of the U.S. workforce remains unemployed.

Interest rates near zero risk fanning asset bubbles or propping up inefficient companies, say Rajan and William White, former head of the Bank for International Settlements’ monetary and economic department. After Europe’s debt crisis recedes, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke should start increasing his benchmark rate by as much as 2 percentage points so it’s no longer negative in real terms, Rajan says.

“Low rates are not a free lunch, but people are acting as though they are,” said White, 67, who retired in 2008 from the Basel, Switzerland-based BIS and now chairs the Economic Development and Review Committee at the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. “There will be pressure on central banks to follow an expansionary monetary policy, and I worry that one can see the benefits, but what people inadequately appreciate are the downsides.”

He and Rajan will have the chance to make their case at the Fed’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, this week. In 2003, White told attendees central banks might need to raise rates to combat asset-price bubbles. In 2005, Rajan, 47, said risks in the banking system had increased. They were met with skepticism from then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, 84, and Governor Donald Kohn, 67.

...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-22/bernanke-must-raise-benchmark-2-points-in-prescient-rajan-s-latest-warning.html

___________________________

Krugman's response (Semi-wonkish. More at link.)
___________________________


August 23, 2010, 10:42 am
Making It Up
Paul Krugman

According to Bloomberg, Raghuram Rajan is now getting specific: he wants Bernanke to raise the Fed funds rate by 200 basis points in the face of 9.5 percent unemployment and inflation under 1 percent.

Let me try to explain what bothers me about this sort of thing, aside from the fact that it would be an utter disaster for the economy: it’s the way Rajan — and many other economists — seem to be making up new doctrines on the fly to justify their policy prejudices.

I’m all in favor of innovative thinking. But my view is that what you say about policy at any given time should be based on some kind of model — and furthermore, you should be willing to apply the same model to other situations, not make it a one-off used to justify what you happen to favor right now.

My writing on policy in this crisis has been based on the same model of macroeconomic policy I use in normal times; it’s just that the situation is different. The quick-and-dirty version looks like this:

...

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/23/making-it-up/#more-12027
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's for the same reason repugs "want their country back".
They haven't finished looting it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Insanity.
The major risk is deflation and depression, and they're worried that asset prices might get overvalued? That's like letting a building burn down because one is afraid of water damage to the furniture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Excellent analogy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everyone is hoarding cash, across the board
there is now talks of deflation, and they are talking about raising interest rates? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The only thing I can figure
is those arguing for these measures are in favor of deflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. If you have a lot of hoarded money deflation is your friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. so the "lesser people" can die quicker & live the planet to the "winners".
may they rot in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC