Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone help me out, what do teabaggers mean when they say they want to "take the country back"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:27 PM
Original message
Someone help me out, what do teabaggers mean when they say they want to "take the country back"?
Do they want to take us back to the days of energy task force, or the time when a lot of people unfortunately seemed to think that gays were 10 foot tall evil wizards with magical powers, or the time when people checked under their beds and in their closets for COMMUNISTS!!!, or the time when "witches" were burned at the stake, or the time when you had people on your farm and you weren't really obligated to pay them anything at all, or the time when you weren't free to sit where you wanted on the bus, or what?

This era is far from perfect, but you could easily say that we have a lot less fear and want than in the past.

Thanks, but no thanks, teabaggers. Maybe it's fun for you all to live in fear of Muslims, feminists, blacks, immigrants, gays, Latinos, liberals, atheists, people who know that trickle down economics is a scam, the poor, etc., but the rest of us want to live in the now, and I think November will reflect that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Take the country back" means:
"We hate it that we have a black President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Like, no, but seriously
when is the white man going to get a fair shake in this country? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. That's it in a nutshell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azureblue Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. It means
Edited on Sat Aug-28-10 05:28 PM by azureblue
1- we messed it up when we had it, so we want to mess it up some more
2- we think government works like the return desk at Wal Mart - you can "take it back"
3- them colored got too uppity and we want to take the country back -- to the days of slavery
4- we don't know what to do with it even if we get it back.
5- we want to return to the days of yore that only existed on TV for white folks
6- a colored, educated, smart President? We don't want anybody smarter than us in the Oval Office
7- we saw the movie "Idiocracy" and that's the government we want
8- we didn't do anything when Bush wrecked the country, so we want to take the country back to those times.


Please add your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. But...
They don't believe Bush even wrecked the country at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Means "WAAAAAT PAAAAAR."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. They want to take it back to the good old days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. A return to regressive conservatism
Or getting the GOP back in power, same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's become a cliche after Howard Dean used it to strongest effect nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. They feel a white, Christian sense of entitlement...

Obama took that away. That want that feeling (as false as it may be) back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. They want to take it back to 1890. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Back to the days of back-room abortions, no minority/women's rights - no voting rights n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. the answer to your question is
all of the above.

if people get out and vote in November, i am convinced that the dems will win. it's a big if unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's a meaningless catch phrase....
rooted in a trumped up sense of having been victimized.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. The ones I know pretty much mean
Back to when you automatically got a better deal when it came to jobs, hiring etc., if you were a white man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. then they are idiots for wanting the GOP back in power. more jobs for other countries. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I didn't say they were smart
But they are, well, direct.

I wouldn't want to be a prominent republican candidate when and if they finally figure out who's been screwing them over these many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. They want a white President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You're right, my dear Swede...
It's their damn fault that they ran such a poor candidate!

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Translated they don't like minorities of any kind to have equal
Edited on Sat Aug-28-10 04:39 PM by MadMaddie
rights.

They want to go back to the days when they could spit on us,sick their dogs on us and blow up our black churches and not be held accountable.

Rachal Maddow is right, Beck and others like him feed on the story of if the Minorities and other non-right leaning people in America gain prosperity, education and advancement in life then Whites are losing something.

Sorry, this angers me because Sharpton had a march and barely got any coverage. The media is helping Beck and his cause.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brewens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. To African Americans it means, "we'd put y'all right back in them
cotton fields if we had our way!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. They want to fire up the Wayback Machine and set the controls for Mayfield
Once they've had a goblet of milk straight from June Cleaver's refrigerator, they can relax and revel in the timeless glory of an America that never was (and that they never inhabited).

If that technology turns out to be unavailable, they'll settle for hating gays, atheists, liberals and the first black president . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. white male protestant hegemony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. Interesting comment
Edited on Sat Aug-28-10 05:14 PM by RandomThoughts


You can learn from anything. What does this clip say? Then again, why believe it, it is just a movie.

Dream Warrior.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtiaYVyF_18


Anyone get what can be learned from that clip...


(hint you have to drop the nouns, and see that the 'freddy thing' apologizes in that clip, notice also how 'freddy thing' goes for the heart.)


Should add this clip also
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUqgDzUk80k


So what is our TV shows teaching kids now adays anyways?


Then there is Alice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO1zRnSccQ0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Meany Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. They want to be in control...what else could it mean?
They would like to force everyone to be like them, leave the country, or be marginalized.

Personally, I think the need to control others in order to feel good yourself is a sign of mental illness, usually accompanied by a lack of self-control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's little more than a marketing slogan.
Edited on Sat Aug-28-10 04:47 PM by Marr
For some it means, 'back to having the Republicans back in charge', for others it means, 'back to having a white man in charge', and for some (most, I suspect) it's nothing more than an aggressive noise that makes them feel like they're connected to something respectable and powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Code for get that N-Word and his
family out of the Oval Office. Sadly, I have few doubts they many of them would have serious issues with rounding up Moslems, Jews, Hispanics, Gays, Blacks, Browns, Asians, you-fill-in-the-ethnicity-or-differing-religion --- and either deporting or incarcerating them in camps. They're trapped in and longing for some fantasized Norman Rockwell-esque vision of 1950s America which never really existed, but makes them feel secure and at the top of the social/racial/jobs heap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. They don't just want to take the country back...
they want to take it way, way back. (not mine, attributable to some other poster a few weeks ago).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. Everyone has it all wrong. They are taking it back for him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
activa8tr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. The native Americans were very generous to those Europeans, gave them
food, seed corn, taught them how to grow and harvest in harsh New England weather.

But then most of them died in wars or when Europeans gave them alcohol and guns, and some illnesses they hadn't been exposed to.

Native Americans would probably do a better job than Republicans these days, at running the nation and taking care of all people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Beat me to it.


Take it back from whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. It means "We hate non-Whites"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. It means we want a Republican President. Oh, and a White one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. This started with election of Obama, a black president. The very
first pictures (long before the Tea Party developed)
of some very unhappy voters in Arkansas actually crying
and screaming --we want our country back.

While most of the country has moved forward since the
Civil Rights era, there a pockets here and there across
the country who could not bring themselves to believe
A BLACK MAN could be elected president.

Very interesting the "I want my country backers turned
up in the TeaParty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. They mean: Implement the StormFront agenda
It's fear of change, of diversity, of multiculturalism that motivates some to glom onto causes for the preservation of white power and privilege.

But, according to some, we're not allowed to call it bigotry. What do you think of THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Obviously, it means they want to go backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
34. It never belonged to them exclusively and never will, and it will never 'go back'
to whatever false construct no matter how hard they fantasize and threaten Americans with their '2nd Amendment right'. :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. They have no clue. They say what Fox tells them to say. It's like being at a football game to them.
They cheer what they're told to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. Take the country back = only White men in the White House. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. They want to take us back to the days of the Founding of the Republic.
You know, back when an individual of African descent was legally 3/5 of a human being, could be owned like chattel, and was certainly not entitled to vote.

Back when wimmin were legally the property of their fathers or husbands and couldn't vote either.

Back when if you massacred a few hundred Native Americans and stole their land you were publicly applauded for it...


you know... THE GOOD OLD DAYS! When Freedom rang and all that flapdoodle.


helpfully,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. sigh..do you really want to know? editorials from my local paper
http://www.elliscountypress.com/editorials/9822-Simply-Speaking%3A-%E2%80%98A-Rare-Diamond%E2%80%99.html

Make no mistake, we are in a full scale war, not with bullets or bombs (yet), not of invading Redcoats (1773), nor of invading Bluecoats (1861), but now it is a war between the Red and the Blue (states, counties, cities, right down to local precincts).

http://www.elliscountypress.com/editorials/9820-does-the-new-financial-reform-law-protect-you.html

This is just another example of why I personally have never been able to trust Democrats. They always seem to put party and power before any concern about what’s best for the country and the people. I’ve lived a long time and things haven’t changed much since the 1960s. As long as they have the power, it won’t either.

Stay tuned for more sad developments in the on-going saga of Obama’s takeover and remake of our republic.


http://www.elliscountypress.com/editorials/4094-desperate-measures.html

They are using their "nuclear weapon" - calling the Tea Party a "racist movement." Nothing could be further from the truth. Of course, Democrats have stooped to this level before when they used the "nuclear bomb" daisy ad against Republican Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater in 1964.

I have been to a number of tea party events, and have seen nothing that could be called racist. Of course, socialists don’t need evidence, they just need emotion. So what if some signs showed Obama as the Joker or comparing him to Hitler. Bush was shown in the same unflattering light. Do we not still have free speech?


http://www.elliscountypress.com/editorials/4093-the-naacp.html

Oh yeah; the NAACP, during its recent national convention at St. Louis, in addition to hanging onto the every utterance of Michelle Obama, I’m sure, also found the time to denigrate, of all things, the Tea Party, or the Tea Party Movement, or a sign somebody once saw at a Tea Party gathering (which they interpreted as) denigrating Colored People in some way. Something like that.

The burr under the NAACP saddle, as I see it is they (NAACP people) think the Tea Party is all about Obama. Guilty conscience? Or, are Coloreds exempt from criticism?



ya want more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. they want to go back to the good old days when old white men made all the rules
and women knew their place and brown people and colored people knew their place too. the good old days. though it doesn't sound all that great to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. back to when only white men were president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. Come on. When "they" want to take their country back, it means going back to the fifties.
Edited on Sat Aug-28-10 07:40 PM by political_Dem
They want women and people of color (most notably Black folks) on their hands and knees serving the White Master.

They get all disturbed when some "uppity" minority has some aspirations such as being POTUS.

Why, that's like fighting words to them.

They declared war against all disenfranchised groups when Mr. Obama came into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
43. They want to take us back to the 1950s. Oh, and kick out everyone else who disagrees.
lastly, they just want the Republicans back in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. Using 2nd Amendment remedies using force (killing people)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. Here is an interesting take on your question.....
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025426.php

"The Civil War, Southerners say, was not about slavery; it was about states' rights. True, but the states' right that they felt was threatened was the right to own slaves.

In the same way, I think, this is about freedom--not any old freedom, like religion or speech. Not those freedoms. What exactly is that freedom that they feel is threatened?

My take is that this country is committed to both freedom and equality, and those twin commitments are not only not exactly compatible but often downright contradictory. So, our history, in a sense, has been a balancing act between the two. The tea partiers, IMO, sense that their freedom to be the superior majority is endangered. With the election of a black president, the twig has been bent way too far in the direction of equality for their comfort. So they sense their freedom is endangered. True, and it is precisely the freedom to comfortably, without challenge, be the majority in power and act accordingly.

They want their country back. And they feel limited, bound, in ways that they were not when they were in the majority. That's why, IMO, they felt no threat from Bush. Bush circumscribed American freedom in all kinds of ways, but not in a way that seemed to elevate minorities to equality. That's why they had no problem with Bush. That's the freedom they want back."
Posted by: Raenelle on August 28, 2010 at 7:30 PM | PERMALINK

The above is a response to the article at the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
48. It means they want to protect their networks that override the law.
Wake up people. We live in a two tiered community. They're fucking bullies because you won't open your eyes and see how they're getting away with so much worse than you can imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC