|
kept a lot of really expensive overseas journalists. After 'Nam, as the old guard died, and especially by the 80's with the explosive growth of cable, foreign correspondents vanished.
I still remember at the beginning of the second Gulf War, Fox had no foreign correspondents. CNN had a few faces, but even they had only a few. NBC, ABC, and CBS weren't much better. By that time, the AP was the source of most foreign news.
Just as the thousands of local media outlets were swallowed up by a few big organizations, foreign coverage was limited and outsourced because it was expensive. Whey pay a correspondent to sit in a bar in Rome (Watch Roman Holiday 1953, good movie) when you could contract your reporting to the AP.
Though I respect your tin foil Chapeau, I think this can all be explained as a mixture of U.S. isolationism (a preference for navel gazing) and profit motive. If there were a gaggle of press types sitting in bars in Ecuador looking for a report to phone home, this would be great stuff. That type of recording doesn't exist anymore. I don't see any evidence of some secretive bureaucratic official deciding what is fit for the News to broadcast and controlling the stories.
|