Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congrats to Blackwater for its fat new State Department contract!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:50 PM
Original message
Congrats to Blackwater for its fat new State Department contract!!!
Caring about violent abuses of authority is so 2008.

From Spencer Ackerman for WIRED:

Never mind the dead civilians. Forget about the stolen guns. Get over the murder arrests, the fraud allegations, and the accusations of guards pumping themselves up with steroids and cocaine. Through a “joint venture,” the notorious private security firm Blackwater has won a piece of a five-year State Department contract worth up to $10 billion, Danger Room has learned.

Apparently, there is no misdeed so big that it can keep guns-for-hire from working for the government. And this is despite a campaign pledge from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to ban the company from federal contracts.

Eight private security firms have won State’s giant Worldwide Protective Services contract, the big Foggy Bottom partnership to keep embassies and their inhabitants safe. Two of those firms are longtime State contract holders DynCorp and Triple Canopy. The others are newcomers to the big security contract: EOD Technology, SOC, Aegis Defense Services, Global Strategies Group, Torres International Services and International Development Solutions LLC.

Don’t see any of Blackwater’s myriad business names on there? That’s apparently by design. Blackwater and the State Department tried their best to obscure their renewed relationship. As Danger Room reported on Wednesday, Blackwater did not appear on the vendors’ list for Worldwide Protective Services. And the State Department confirms that the company, renamed Xe Services, didn’t actually submit its own independent bid. Instead, they used a blandly-named cut out, “International Development Solutions” to retains a toehold into State’s lucrative security business. Blackwater’s “affiliate U.S. Training Center is part of International Development Solutions (IDS), a joint venture with Kaseman,” according to an official State Department statement to Danger Room. “This joint venture was determined by the Department’s source selection authority to be eligible for award."

=====

Spencer is clearly just a whiner.

http://www.americablog.com/2010/10/congrats-to-blackwater-for-its-fat-new.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want to say I despise Hillary Clinton. I can't think of another word to use instead of despise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Her boss must also think it's time to "move forward"
Ah, DLC. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just more "looking forward"
As the administration has a policy of not prosecuting for past war crimes it is a pity "rule of law" (remember that?) doesn't allow prosecution for future war crimes they are apt to be commit.

Maybe we're suppose to believe Blackwater has changed its ways.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank goodness it's not business as usual and that we're holding 'em accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh but we're supposed to stop 'whining.'
We're s'posed to shut up and eat our spinach, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And quit wishing for ponies
So unsensible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And get yourself drug tested
Yay! Blackwater!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And vote! If you don't vote, even the ponies you have will be taken away from you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. And expect Canadian style heatlhcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Buck up!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. True, Obama is nothing like Bush. He just carries on
a lot of Bush's policies. State Department ... that is the executive branch right?

Just wanted to make sure I wasn't blaming anything on Obama unnecessarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Changealicious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Change That Freakin Matters! Take that slogan and shove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. that is another change we can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why?! Because they're too chicken shit to fight Republicans who'd make a federal case of it?
Or because they're actually pleased with Blackwater's stellar work as a contractor?

I can't think of any other possibility. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Oh barf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Surprise! (not)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Not only do I loathe the mercenary aspect of this...
It's the fact that this is Eric Prince's (former?) company and he and his mom funneled so much cash to Prop 8. I really don't think we should be *employing* companies that are using profits for social engineering on a massive scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. k & r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC