Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ahhh... The buried lede. All the way on page 5 from NYTimes article on Linda McMahon's run in CT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:45 PM
Original message
Ahhh... The buried lede. All the way on page 5 from NYTimes article on Linda McMahon's run in CT
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/magazine/26politics-t.html?pagewanted=5&_r=1&hpw

I was discussing the mood in the state recently with Tom D’Amore, a former state Republican chairman who has long since bolted the party, when suddenly he told me a story about his father, an Electrolux vacuum salesman who smoked more than a pack a day for most of his life. “One day, it must have been in the 1960s sometime, he just quit,” D’Amore told me. “Cold turkey. I said to him, ‘Dad, why did you suddenly decide to stop smoking?’ And I’ll never forget it. He pointed a finger at me” — and here D’Amore demonstrated by grimly pointing one at me — “and he said: ‘The surgeon general of the United States says smoking can kill you. And they wouldn’t lie about a thing like that.’

“I mean, can you imagine anyone saying that now?” D’Amore asked me. “In that generation, government really displayed by its actions that it was a force for good.” He leaned back in his chair and shook his head.

“Nobody here thinks that way anymore.”

From this NY Times magazine article
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/magazine/26politics-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hpw


The Teabaggers want moral certainty. The progressives want an ethical government. Neither is getting what they want; and probably won't unless something drastic happens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. we actually have a lot of things we want similar. it may sould crazy, but
people want and expect things. some are afraid of losing those things. they think we want to take them away. but in reality, this is a misconception created by the media causing us to not even talk to each other. and as long as we fight each other, the companies win. we aren't seeing them robbing the store. we are paralyzed watching our house being robbed and it feels like there is nothing we can do about it. it's like a couple who starts fighting over taking out the garbage and then all of a sudden are fighting about something else entirely. they end up fighting about everything except what it all really about in the first place.... for the teabaggers it's fear of change. fear of having something taken away from them. no one wants to take anything from them but fear is a powerful thing.... it shows itself in the form of anger. and people are angry and not really sure why. it's sad because this is affecting families. this is affecting relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Have you ever heard of Thalidomide?
http://www.section216.com/history/Kelsey.pdf

DR. Fances Oldham Kelsey...who worked for the FDA, virtually single handedly stopped the tragedy of Thalidomide from
spreading to the US.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/13/AR2010091306279.html


Physician to be honored for historic decision on thalidomide

It was a straightforward assignment for a newcomer to the Food and Drug Administration, such a simple task that Frances Oldham Kelsey was given a cubbyhole of an office and the bare basics to get it done: review an application from a drug company to market a new sedative called Kevadon.

The drug was already widely used in Britain, Germany and about 20 other countries and it was a lucrative success for its manufacturer, the William S. Merrell Co., which was eager to get it into medicine cabinets in the United States.

At the time, in 1960, Americans were dazzled by vaccines, antibiotics and the vast array of new discoveries defining modern life.

But Kelsey, a physician and a pharmacologist, questioned the safety of Kevadon, the brand name for thalidomide, and refused approval. "It just came with so many extravagant claims that I didn't believe," Kelsey, now 96, said Monday in an interview at her Bethesda home.

The drug company pushed back and started an intense campaign, repeatedly calling and meeting with Kelsey and her superiors, including the FDA commissioner.

Kelsey was steadfast, and her resistance became the stuff of legend when it turned out that thalidomide caused severe birth defects in thousands of babies born in Europe and elsewhere. The drug had been prescribed for women to help them sleep or manage morning sickness. The babies often had malformed arms or legs or extra appendages.


As a young researcher at the University of Chicago, Kelsey had been concerned about the dangers that drugs can have on fetuses, and she held that in mind as she handled the thalidomide case.

Kelsey was celebrated as a heroine, and President John F. Kennedy gave her the highest civilian honor, making her the second woman to receive it. She wore a new dress from Garfinckel's for the occasion, she said.

To mark the 50th anniversary of Kelsey's action, FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg will present her with the first Kelsey Award on Wednesday, an honor that will be given regularly to an FDA employee to "celebrate courage and scientific decision-making."

The thalidomide case transformed the way Americans think about medicine, said Morton Mintz, a former Washington Post reporter who broke the story of Kelsey and thalidomide in 1962. Images of deformed babies underscored the dangers of drugs, and the need for careful scientific vetting by regulators, he said.

"Until that point, people used to think that science, technology and the drug industry could bring only progress," Mintz said. "People used to think new is necessarily better. But Kelsey nurtured a healthy skepticism in the public and the news media."

The United States was not entirely spared in the thalidomide tragedy. Merrell gave the drug to more than 1,000 U.S. physicians to distribute to 20,000 patients as part of an "investigational" trial. In many cases, the patients were not informed they were participating in an experiment. An estimated 40 babies in the the United States were born with deformities as a result.

The scandal prompted Congress to amend the drug law in 1962 to impose strict limits on the testing and distribution of new medication. The regulations required that drugs had to be proved safe and effective, and that patients had to give informed consent to participate in clinical trials. It also required that the manufacturer report any adverse reactions to the FDA.

After the law was changed, the FDA created a division of new drugs and made Kelsey the director of scientific investigations. Her principal responsibility for the rest of her career in the agency was directing drug testing.

Kelsey was moved from a prefabricated building from World War I that had been erected on the Mall to a new campus in Maryland.

The FDA used her story and image as a recruiting tool, said John P. Swann, a historian at the agency, pointing to a recruiting poster that featured Kelsey's image and the moniker "Drug Detective."

"Most civil servants toil in anonymity," he said. "Here is this woman, almost a Peter Gunn figure, decorated by one of the most beloved presidents. She inspired not just a lot of people to come to the FDA but to realize what a contribution a single person could make."

Kelsey retired from the FDA in 2005 at age 90 but not before recording two oral histories for the agency's archives. "There's just a lot of love around here for her," Swann said.

Despite tougher legislation, critics, consumer groups and public interest organizations say the FDA remains under constant pressure from the companies it regulates.

Last year, the agency took the unusual step of announcing that it was reevaluating its approval of a knee-surgery device after an internal review found that its staff may have been swayed by political pressure. Also last year, a federal court ruled that the FDA bowed to political pressure when it limited access to the emergency contraceptive called Plan B to women older than 18.

Today, Kelsey spends her time playing bridge, watching birds at the feeders on her windowsills and completing crossword puzzles in ink. Her days are punctuated by a glass of sherry at 11 a.m. and an old-fashioned cocktail at 5 p.m.

But 50 years later, the details of her decision and the complex drug names roll off her tongue easily. And on Wednesday, she will return to visit the agency where she made history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, I knew about Sherri Chessen
but not about Kelsey...thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can you believe it..Dr. Kelsey worked until she was 90!!!???
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 03:32 PM by BrklynLiberal
If it had not been for her work, the Sherri Finkbine Chessen story would have been happening all over the country..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC