Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About Those Goings-On in Pakistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:58 PM
Original message
About Those Goings-On in Pakistan
Had a conversation last night.

I was reminded that in addition to Pakistan being nuclear-armed it is also a whisker's breadth from political collapse.

I was then informed that Pakistan is a veritable client state of the Chinese.

China apparently likes to use Pakistan as a counter-weight against India as the Indians and Chinese have territorial disputes.

India also has historically long-running conflicts with Pakistan.

India, as it will be recalled is nuclear-armed.

Now I read in the news that NATO convoys in Pakistan are being attacked in retaliation for strikes against presumed militant bases.

India, I am told, would never tolerate Pakistan falling to the radicals.

China, I am told, would never tolerate Pakistan falling to India...assuming Pakistan didn't launch their weapons rather than see them overrun.

Supposedly the US has contingency plans to snatch Pakistani nukes if the country destabilizes.

Are these statements, for the most part, factual?



I genuinely believe the president ordered those strikes based on the intel provided to him by his staff...

...but I have a really sick feeling in my stomach that this could spiral out of control rather quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me share something I posted on another thread.
From a 2008 news story:

To fuel its growing economy, India is turning to Iran. A proposed 2,600-kilometer gas pipeline would carry natural gas from fields in Iran to India to satisfy the country's increasing demand for energy. The proposed 7.5-billion dollar pipeline would run through Pakistan. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf cleared obstacles to the planned pipeline after the Iranian President's recent visit to New Delhi and Islamabad. Washington continues to oppose the pipeline because it believes the pipeline will bolster Iran.

http://payvand.com/news/08/jun/1158.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I dont really see that happening
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 08:04 PM by Vehl
India does not want to make the strategic blunder of having a significant % of its oil supply coming through Pakistan.


All this talk about the Iran-Pakistan-Indian pipeline is just that; talk. They talk about this just to make it seem as if some trade/potential is possible between Pakistan and India...especially during the times when they countries have "talks".


To expect India to have its oil need met by a pipeline through Pakistan is like expecting Israel to get its oil via a pipeline through Syria....or for South Korea to get oil via north Korea. Does not make any sense...and will not happen.Pakistan will hold the threat of some "militant" attacks on this oil pipeline every-time India and Pakistan have a disagreement (which is quite often). There is no surer way for India to shoot its own foot than going ahead with this proposal...and that's why this has remained in the "proposal' stage for nearly 2 decades...and will remain so forever (imho)


Iran is pretty close via sea to India...and there is no reason for them to go for this land route.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, those are generally accurate statements. The only thing I really don't know about is the...
...whole "China would never tolerate Pakistan falling to India" thing or Pakistan being a Chinese client state. I don't recall ever hearing that or anything like that.

BTW, it's not Pakistan that set those twenty-seven (or so) tankers on fire. It was Pakistani "militants". (wink)

And there will be a lot more attacks by "militants" if the U.S. keeps killing Pakistani soldiers.

BTW if, by the most seriously disturbing chance, we get into an actual war with Pakistan expect the U.S. to do everything humanly possible to overtly or covertly drag India into it, which would almost inevitably mean some nuke going off in either of those countries.

The U.S. is so out of control right now, and it looks like we might be breaking with the ISI (Pakistani CIA, who seem to "reallY' run the country) that the whole of everything can just go tits up in a heartbeat.

Or, it could be a clever plan to help get Pervez Musharraf re-elected.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC