Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama Taps Food-Industry Exec (Mars) for Top Ag Research Post"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:42 AM
Original message
"Obama Taps Food-Industry Exec (Mars) for Top Ag Research Post"
Obama taps food-industry exec for top ag-research post


by Tom Phillpott

The long-simmering debate about Obama's ag policy -- whether it represents a new paradigm, agribusiness as usual, or some enigmatic combination -- has a new data point to consider.

Earlier this month, Congress approved Obama's nomination of Catherine Woteki, the USDA's undersecretary for research, education, and economics. The appointment drew little attention in the press, including the sustainable-food blogosphere. That's surprising, because Woteki comes to her new position after a five-year stint as global director of scientific affairs for Mars, Inc., the multinational junk-food giant.

In her new role, Woteki will direct the U.S. government's entire agricultural research budget. That means she will supervise Roger Beachy, head of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, who oversees the USDA's billion-dollar-a-year competitive grants program. Beachy is a genetic scientist with strong ties to GM seed giant Monsanto; he is openly hostile to organic agriculture. At a time when U.S. farms desperately need to move toward more sustainable methods, federally supported agriculture research has fallen into the hands of a Monsanto man answering to a junk-food exec.


Somewhere in the East Wing, Michelle Obama must be fuming. The first lady has labored hard to fight the rising tide of diet-related maladies among children -- and her husband has now handed the nation's agricultural research agenda to someone who recently owed her living to robust sales of stuff like Milky Way, M&M's, Twix, Skittles, Wrigley's gum, and Snickers bars, all heavily marketed to kids.

With its $30 billion in annual revenue, Mars is the sixth-largest privately held company in the United States. In addition to heavily sweetened candy, Mars churns out convenience fare like Uncle Ben's rice and pet food like Whiskas brand.

-snip-

Woteki's new post represents a return to, not her debut at, the USDA (bio here). She held a variety of high-level positions in the agency under Bill Clinton, including a stint in the same position she now holds. The Clinton administration was generally quite friendly to the interests of Big Food. Woteki epitomized the administration's gung-ho attitude toward genetically modified (GM) seed industry in a 1996 paper she co-wrote on "The Administration's Responsibility to the Consumer" in regards to GM seeds. The paper never mentions potential ecological or public-health issues around GM seeds; it concludes, in essence, that the government's only responsibility to the public concerning the technology is to support it vigorously.

Before taking the Mars job in 2005, she served as dean of agriculture and professor of human nutrition at Iowa State University, a prominent ag-research university with multiple ties to agribusiness. To get a sense of Woteki's tenure at ISU, I called a former colleague of hers there: Fred Kirschenmann, former president and current distinguished fellow at ISU's Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture and president of New York-based Stone Barns Center for Food and Agriculture.

Kirschenman's time as president of the Leopold Center coincided with Woteki's deanship of the ag department, which oversees the center. Kirschenman was forced out of the presidency of Leopold in 2005, at the behest of Woteki's successor, interim dean Wendy Wintersteen. Kirschenmann's ouster as president of Leopold drew widespread outrage in the sustainable-ag world; it was widely read, by Kirschenmann himself and others, as a purge executed by industrial-ag interests.

In a phone interview this week, Kirschenmann told me that Woteki's time as ISU ag dean started promisingly and ended with a thud. "When she first came on board, she asked me to cowrite a white paper about the possibility of starting a new 'Center for Agricultural Ecology,'" Kirschenmann told me. The idea was to create a counterweight to the ag department's heavy involvement in GM research.

"We cowrote the paper, and Woteki expressed support for the idea," he said. But then, suddenly, she withdrew her support. "She even told us she preferred not to use the word 'ecology,' because it made people uncomfortable." I asked Kirschenmann why Woteki had raised the idea of an agro-ecology center and then abruptly crushed it. He said he could only guess, "but you have to understand that four forces have a lot of power in Iowa ag: the National Corn Growers Association, the National Soybean Growers, the Farm Bureau, and the Pork Producers Association."


Kirschenmann added that after the promising start, Woteki did "nothing bold or innovative" in her ISU tenure. He was not encouraged by the prospects of Woteki heading up USDA research. "She won't stand up to the Monsantos of the world," he said. "She won't even try."

More at:
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-10-01-obama-taps-food-industry-exec-to-top-ag-research-post

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting choice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wish he would select some people who haven't been part of prior administrations.
There are so many other people who might bring a fresh perspective than retreds who work in Govt. then go out and work for Private then come back again. In theory that should give them good experience...but given the way corporations are these days it looks more like influence peddling through a revolving door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. God knows this Country of ours could use a
fresh perspective. You are so right about the revolving door and influence peddling,I don't think it should be allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Plus...Obama's Campaign seemed so Geared to Change by the Young Ones!
How can it be he's on Auto-Pilot with these Clinton Retreads? Where are the YOUNG FOLKS he promised to bring in? :shrug: And by "Young" I don't mean novices ....but those who deserve some time that "wasn't served in the CLINTON ADMINISTRATION or BUSH II or POPPY BUSH!

What is going on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another former Clinton official that left government for big business
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 11:47 AM by izzybeans
her background is a really great fit for this, except for her post-clinton admin. activities at Mars (on the surface at least). Any one know what she was doing there? http://www.isupjcenter.org/about/directors/woteki.cfm

Seems to be a trend. Revolving door et al.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I hope that after this Mid-Term Election we can finally get down to REAL ISSUES..
where we can work for the "Change we Can (Hoped To) BELIEVE IN!

But, sadly the minute the "Mid-terms" are over it will be ELECTION 2012 and we will be told not to speak up about issues because "Sarah" will be running and "WHICH DEMS WOULD WANT THAT EVIL ONE to be PRESIDENT!" Sit DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP ....no CRITICISM ALLOWED once again.

Obama's Presidency seems to ride on issues that CLINTON never resolved because of his problems with Monica Lewinsky and the Right Wing we tried to beat back.

Yet....Obama has filled most of his appointments and Cabinet/Advisors with Clinton Administration folks.

Is it "Clinton II" or NOT?

Who really is in CHARGE HERE? Shouldn't Democratic Voters have a RIGHT to KNOW? :shrug: WHY NOT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. You know.....I can understand why Michelle took off to Spain with her daughter..
given that she must be very frustrated with the way "Government Works." I believe that Michelle loves her husband dearly...but that Pressure Cooker of the White House and the stresses her Husband is under has to be a really tough thing for a Woman who lived through Princeton University as a young black female in the "ERA" she was there.

I lived in Princeton, NJ at the time Michelle was there and believe me ..that was a horrible tought RW Crowd of the Old Establishment that she had to go through.

I always thought that Michelle was the more grounded of the two in that relationship. And, when she did her Spain Thing...I knew that she was sending "hubby" a BIG MESSAGE.

DID HE HEAR IT? Will he GET IT? Michelle gets IT....but what can she do? Her "First Lady" duties and considerations for her family must be a huge conflict for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. What? Chocolate and Caramel aren't food?
Why, she might even find ways to IMPROVE Chocolate and Caramel! Won't that be a boon to mankind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC