Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help,my DU friends.How do you find out who a corporation has contributed to?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 02:52 PM
Original message
Help,my DU friends.How do you find out who a corporation has contributed to?
Specifically La Roche Pharmaceutical from 2001-2009.

I am working on an editorial on Larium...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Try www.opensecrets. org
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. interesting...I may just get disappreared if I report this
Edited on Tue Oct-12-10 03:05 PM by w8liftinglady
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00072769&cycle=2004
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00072769&cycle=2006

They must be based in New jersey.If you remove NJ,a Texas Representative(MINE) is next on the list.He CAN be bought.

however,in 2008-the Dems took over as the whores.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00072769&cycle=2008

Maybe it was to keep them from withdrawing lariam from the market.
la Rouche withdrew their lariam in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. But, "soft money" contributions to outside groups such as ACC won't show up.
That info is virtually impossible to obtain. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. yeah-I was afraid of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. what legislation allowed them to stop disclosing soft money contributions/
Edited on Tue Oct-12-10 03:17 PM by w8liftinglady
hopefully,this chart will show up right 4 is the one we are looking for

1.Total Contributions 2.Contributions from Individuals 3.Contributions from PACs 4.Soft Money Contributions 5.Donations to Democrats 6.Donations to Republicans 7.% to Dems 8.% to Repubs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2010* $9,786,428 $2,525,900 $7,260,528 N/A $5,044,855 $4,656,113 52% 48%
2008* $15,660,865 $6,107,698 $9,553,167 N/A $7,684,969 $7,958,571 49% 51%
2006* $11,197,015 $3,237,890 $7,959,125 N/A $3,210,717 $7,789,718 29% 70%
2004* $10,186,044 $3,910,365 $6,275,679 N/A $3,149,214 $7,016,955 31% 69%
2002 $21,897,005 $1,683,533 $5,316,068 $14,897,404 $4,466,003 $17,408,495 20% 80%
2000 $19,545,743 $3,357,655 $4,588,705 $11,599,383 $4,412,611 $15,091,202 23% 77%
1998 $9,045,646 $1,231,935 $3,181,744 $4,631,967 $2,818,513 $6,216,908 31% 69%
1996 $9,389,918 $1,479,199 $2,823,154 $5,087,565 $2,801,712 $6,571,902 30% 70%
1994 $5,423,887 $951,951 $2,768,621 $1,703,315 $2,145,432 $3,276,638 40% 60%
1992 $4,442,254 $1,205,658 $1,892,896 $1,343,700 $2,150,225 $2,271,232 48% 51%
1990 $2,370,995 $472,179 $1,898,816 N/A $1,040,711 $1,328,069

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/totals.php?cycle=2010&ind=H4300
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act was struck down in 2007 by SCOTUS
Edited on Tue Oct-12-10 03:48 PM by leveymg
On June 25, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act which restricted corporations and labor unions from broadcasting ads at election time using general funds. In the 5-4 decision in the case of Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Chief Justice John Roberts concluded that the ads at issue were not "the 'functional equivalent' of express campaign speech," meaning that these ads are protected under the First Amendment. Supporters of campaign finance reform worried that the decision would lead to a surge of soft money funded campaign ads disguised as issue ads.<4> http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act_of_2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC