O'Donnell, when pressed, couldn't identify a single Supreme Court Case

[Wickerman]

that she disagreed with.

"There are many, but I can't think of them right now."

She went on to say many federal cases, like Prop 8 in CA.

LOL

What a moroon.

Even when the mods spoonfed her Roe V. Wade she said, oh, you said recent.

:crazy:

[DisgustipatedinCA]

1. that was completely devastating

Dead air, followed by the admission that she has absolutely no idea about the USSC's recent docket. She just showed anyone who cares to see that she's woefully inadequately prepared to be a United States Senator.

[elleng]

2. Surprised?

[vanbean]

24. NO, I am not surprised. But goddamit, she is not a witch, she's you.

[elleng]

29. Ain't ME!!!

:rofl:

[vanbean]

30. Who are you going to believe? You or your lying ears?

[LynneSin]

3. She probably can't tell you what newspapers she reads either

ugh she's such a whackadoo

[Motown_Johnny]

9. oh, all of them

[Bozita]

12. Betting she's got a whole list of newspapers memorized.

But nobody's asking.

[Xipe Totec]

19. The only thing she reads is tea leaves nt

[Drale]

4. Shes a robot

and a robot only knows what it was programed to know. Plus we all know the republicans dont want women (or anyone but the rich for that matter) to be educated because, stupid masses are easily controlled masses.

[StClone]

14. That was my take

Christine O’Donnell doesn't answer questions she hears keywords and reiterates the associated memorized response.

[Liberal_in_LA]

5. sorry I missed it.

[meeshrox]

6. Indeed...awesome!

'I'll put it on my website, I promise!' :eyes:

[Tatiana]

7. Don't worry.... she'll put it on her website! LMAO. n/t

[Lucy Goosey]

8. Palin lite...

...I'm surprised she isn't fucking winking at me. :eyes:

[Cognitive_Resonance]

10. Her talking points don't cover questions like that. She's an empty vessel. nt

[Sparkly]

11. She said they'll be up on her website.

Probably before she's even finished with this debate! :rofl:

[DearAbby]

13. Why didn't she give the Palin answer?

All of them? No wait that was for "Which newspapers do you read?"

But the same answer would work in a pinch. Or just hold up the palms of her hands and say, "Sorry I recently washed after the 'little girl's room'"

[Mimosa]

15. She is a FOOL.

She is not very ight-bray as my friend Vince says. :P

Coons isn't much, but anybody would be better than O'Donnell.

[Liberal Veteran]

16. She could have said, "I'll Try To Find You Some, and Bring'em To Ya ..."

She would have been better off saying, "Well, I don't have the components with me to conjure any up, but if you bring me some wing of bat I'll see what I can do."

[bullwinkle428]

41. She actually said she would put them on her website!!!

:rofl:

[harun]

17. Won't hurt her a bit. Her bosses want an empty glass, they got that. Her supporters

want politicians that are in over their head and listen to the Republican leadership like robots.

[StClone]

18. What is a Real-it-tor?

She repeated the word several times and obviously doesn't know she's mispronouncing the word. Does she say new-kul-lar? The last leader that did was a disaster.

[dkf]

20. Sarah Palin redux.

[BlueIdaho]

21. Is her real role to make Palin look like a member of Mensa?

How can anyone be this stupid?

[brewens]

22. I wouldn't expect her to be able to rattle off accurate case

names and years. She should know a couple at least and the basic info on a few more, weather she knows the name or not.
Kind of like Palin with the reading. A journalism degree for christ sake and she can't name a few? How about The Wall Street Journal, her home town paper and maybe News Week? Anything would have been an ok answer.
Katie may have been setting her up though. She may have been ready with specific questions about recent articles in a number of likely publications.

[LynneSin]

23. Seriously, Dred Scott is always a good fall back answer!

It's sad she couldn't even come up with that or even worse she wouldn't commit herself to saying Roe V. Wade was a bad decision.

[coti]

25. She's lucky she didn't say "Brown v. Board of Education," which I'm

sure she would have just blurted out if she really listened to her supporters.

[JanetLovesObama]

26. Uhhh, Uhhhhh -

I'll get back to ya and post is on my website." Where have we heard that crap before?

[tavalon]

27. In what way, Charlie?

[spanone]

28. she said 'i'll put it on my website' till wolf blitzer offered roe v wade

[Scurrilous]

31. LOL

:thumbsup:

[Warren DeMontague]

32. That's doubly ignorant, since Sarah Palin got walloped by the exact same question.

I mean, she couldn't even take a minute to prepare for the obvious ones?

Second, for fuck's sake: Anyone as hot and bothered as she is to outlaw Masturbation, as well as to get Teh Gayz, should be familiar w/ Lawrence v. Texas. Easy.

[Rex]

33. Grumpy vs. Disneyland?

Surely she disagrees with the 1984 landmark ruling of Hairy Palms vs. Vaseline Inc. :freak:

[lame54]

35. I thought they worked out an agreement

[felix_numinous]

34. Perfect for the job.

Completely dependent on talking points, and batshit crazy.

[Blue Owl]

36. Her favorite SC case: "Oh, all of 'em..."

n/t

[rucky]

37. Somone let her know that Couric v. Palin is not a legal precedent.

[spanone]

38. she also claimed we were at war with russia in afghanistan

guess republicons don't have to be responsible for their words

[Stevenmarc]

39. I doubt she could identify a single Supreme Court Justice either

[old mark]

43. I'm trying to forget many of them myself.....nt

[MadBadger]

40. Honestly, that doesnt bother me all that much. Recent would make me think last ten years

And I know i at least dont have a list in my head of supreme court cases in that span.

[Wickerman]

42. Fair enough. For you. I don't think you are running for the Senate

and you don't, from what I have seen, complain about activist judges. Context IS everything.

If you are running for Senate please accept my most humble apologies and good luck!