Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you support the drug war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:45 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you support the drug war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was the first vote!
I don't support the drug war at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely not. Does anyone here? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Prohibition has never and will never work.
The country's too big and the demand's too high.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I do not support the so-called 'war' on (some) drugs, nor any such 'war'
on an abstraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course I DO NOT support the WOD's
However, we are ALL forced to support it through our taxes.

Just think where all our tax dollars could go if we were allowed to choose where we wanted them to go. I already have a list of where I would want my tax dollars to go.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. You didn't specify on which side. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Drug War must end
I face particular fierce offensives in the Prescription Drug Campaign of the Drug War. DHS isn't shooting people at the border for bringing in prescription drugs obtained in Canada, yet, so I'm told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. too unspecific
I support efforts to prevent certain drugs from being imported and sold on the streets, most parents do btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Yes, we must think of the children, that'll justify it...
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 05:27 PM by Warren DeMontague
I'm a parent, and I'm of the opinion that we'd do much better funding treatment on demand (including secular and other scientific alternatives to people who don't want to play the 12 step game) than we do by endlessly pursuing prohibition.

And as far as 'certain drugs'- the majority of drug war expenditures go towards fighting pot smoking. If we legalize, regulate, and tax that, we would be most of the way towards a saner approach to the whole ballgame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm all for a more saner approach.
And I think California can help push the country in that direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I just don't think prohibition is the answer. I have trouble envisioning meth sold at the 7-11
but I've seen lots of problems with legal drugs, i.e. alcohol and nicotine.

All the money that we plow into incarceration and fancy helicopters with infrared vision, could pay for a lot of help for addicted people- addicted to all sorts of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. So you would continue the insane war on drugs you don't like
while admitting it is insane for those you do?

And that is, I suppose, saner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. You seem to be fishing for something
other than a reasonable dialog on the issue. Let me know if you catch something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've always known that it was a money maker for a good deal of people.
I really hate the "DARE" program police cars that drive around here. The go to schools and tell kids to not do drugs and that is supposed to work but it doesn't. It just gives some cops something nice to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which drug? As far as I can tell, smack hasn't done anyone a whole lot of good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Throwing people in jail for it doesn't do a whole lot of good, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think for this debate to be interesting, people need to spell out
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 05:12 PM by BootinUp
exactly what they want to be legal or illegal. For example, even the Netherlands has controlled substance laws and long prison terms for certain activities with certain drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Ok, how about this--the total decriminalization of all drugs.
Treating addiction as a public health problem, not a law enforcement one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Why can't we treat it as a public health problem
and still have laws against importing/exporting/sales of the drugs that are clearly harmful? If your main concern is prosecution of casual drug users, I would be inclined to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I think decriminalization
doesn't mean importing/... would be legal. However keeping everything illegal drives the business underground where people get ripped off and they have can't the police, file lawsuits, etc. They are out of luck unless... That is where the violent crimes associated it with come in place. Dealers robbing dealers, users robbing dealers, and dealers ripping off users. That never goes away as long as things remain completely illegal. So as I can you see I'm fringe on this topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I don't think you sound fringe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Well, if you think that addiction = crime, then you are a drug warrior
if you think that addiction is a treatable illness, you do not support the drug war..

Hope it help bra..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Drug War = Law enforcement acts as Pinkertons for Big Pharm, Alcohol, Tobacco.
Also, for the right wing interests, including the GOP, who want the Drug War to penalize citizens who don't vote with them.

The Drug War consumes a majority of our law enforcement, our criminal justice system, and our prisons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, I support it, it's worked so well, cleaned up crime so much and made
America such a better place and got the dirty hippies off the streets.
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. The drug war is a boondoggle enriching the prisions and the police state.
Time to shut the bogus drug war down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Enriching the drug gangs too...
Drugs are cheap -- easy to grow or make. The "war" on drugs increases both the profits and the intensity of violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fuck Eric Holder. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hell No. Legalize and tax marijuana, stop locking people up for non-violent drug offenses
treat addiction as a public health issue, not a LE one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. LMAO.. one fucking loser....
There's one in every crowd :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. We need to get the hell out of Iraq, Afghanistan and the War on Drugs ...
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 05:46 PM by spin
In the case of the War on Drugs, I'm beginning to fear that we may be too late.

Prohibition banned alcohol and enabled the formation and growth of organized crime in our nation. When prohibition ended, the strongest gangs adapted.


The following are statistics detailing how much worse crime got:

* Police funding: INCREASED $11.4 Million
* Arrests for Prohibition Las Violations: INCREASED 102+%
* Arrests for Drunkenness and Disorderly Conduct: INCREASED 41%
* Arrests of Drunken Drivers: INCREASED 81%
* Thefts and Burglaries: INCREASED 9%
* Homicides, Assault, and Battery: INCREASED 13%
* Number of Federal Convicts: INCREASED 561%
* Federal Prison Population: INCREASED 366%
* Total Federal Expenditures on Penal Institutions: INCREASED 1,000%


"Not only did the number of serious crimes increase, but crime became organized. Criminal groups organize around the steady source of income provided by laws against victimless crimes such as consuming alcohol or drugs, gambling and prostitution. In the process of providing goods and services those criminal organizations resort to real crimes in defense of sales territories, brand names, and labor contracts. That is true of extensive crime syndicates (the Mafia) as well as street gangs, a criminal element that first surfaced during prohibition."

"The contributing factor to the sudden increase of felonies was the organization of crime, especially in large cities. Because liquor was no longer legally available, the public turned to gangsters who readily took on the bootlegging industry and supplied them with liquor. On account of the industry being so profitable, more gangsters became involved in the money-making business. Crime became so organized because "criminal groups organize around the steady source of income provided by laws against victimless crimes such as consuming alcohol. As a result of the money involved in the bootlegging industry, there was much rival between gangs. The profit motive caused over four hundred gang related murders a year in Chicago alone."

Bootleg alcohol is what fueled the work of Organized crime. Most of the men involved in the Mafia or gangs were young immigrants. The business of bootleg alcohol was highly profitable for everyone involved which often fueled the Mafia or gang wars. By the late 1920's more than 1 million gallons of bootleg liquor had been illegally brought into the United States. Most of the alcohol came in either through Canada or from ships that were located just beyond U.S. waters. See Coast Guard Pictures during the Prohibition Era. However, there was alcohol being produced legally in the United States that was also being bootlegged. Most of the alcohol being produced for use in manufacture often ended up being bootlegged.

***snip***

Many people wonder why prohibition failed. One of the primary reasons was that there just was not enough money, or police power to stop illegal places like speakeasies from popping up. I think there is another reason. Corruption has a lot to do with the reason why prohibition ended up failing. The following is a story out of Detroit, probably one of the best places to be a bootlegger or to find an illegal drink. "When the state police raided the Deutsches Haus at Mack and Maxwell, they arrested Detroit Mayor John Smith, Michigan Congressman Robert Clancy and Sheriff Edward Stein. From St. Clair Shores' Blossom Heath on Jefferson to Little Harry's downtown, to the Green Lantern Club in Ecorse, Detroit's most upstanding citizens fed the coffers of the gangs that were reaping huge fortunes from their appetite for alcohol." Even elected officials fell into the trap of speakeasies!


http://www.albany.edu/~wm731882/future1_final.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes, but I fight for the other side.
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. How can someone support a "war" that makes about as much sense...
as a "war" on Christmas?

or ugly shoes...

or Chicken Mc Nuggets...

or bad weather...


etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. The 'war on drugs' is the biggest failure in American history.
And the authorities know it and have known for decades. Sad that they let a small group of radicals influence them far beyond what is acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC