Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Cameron steps in to quell military revolt over cuts to defence budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 08:48 AM
Original message
David Cameron steps in to quell military revolt over cuts to defence budget


General Sir Peter Wall, the Chief of the General Staff


David Cameron steps in to quell military revolt over cuts to defence budget
By James Kirkup and Andrew Porter
Published: 10:00PM BST 15 Oct 2010

The Prime Minister made his move after being told by the new head of the Army that proposed reductions in the Forces threatened Britain’s mission in Afghanistan.

General Sir Peter Wall, the Chief of the General Staff, made clear to Number 10 that he could not accept cuts in Army numbers and training which would hamper the Afghan operation. In the wake of Sir Peter’s warning, Downing Street sources last night said Mr Cameron had blocked a Treasury demand for a 10 per cent cut in the defence budget.

“He has intervened against the Treasury. The Army will be protected,” said a source.

Mr Cameron told the Treasury that he would not accept substantial reductions in Army numbers. Downing Street sources added that Mr Cameron was insistent that more savings be made from Trident.

~snip~

Army sources said the full cut demanded by the Treasury would have meant a loss of 7,000 men and the removal of up to four front-line infantry battalions. Army training operations would also have been affected, ultimately impacting on the Afghan operation, the Army warned.




unhappycamper comment: I hope that General Sir Peter Wall picks up his marbles and goes home. Who the hell let civilians tell the military how much money they could spend?

Note to Brits: You've already lost two times in Afghanistan. Why are you trying for a third shot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. What those politicians don't realize.
Edited on Sat Oct-16-10 08:54 AM by RandomThoughts
Is he is bluffing, he can not get the British soldiers to attack Britain.

Britain is a concept of democracy for the people through Parliament. Even King Arthur stories are about democracy, and discussion, not brute force. The concept of the round table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC