Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Way We Forget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:23 AM
Original message
The Way We Forget


(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: betenoir, Capt. Matt Molinski / Ohio National Guard, Staff Sgt. Marcus J. Quarterman / U.S. Army)

The Way We Forget
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Sunday 17 October 2010

This country of ours has a monstrous capacity to forget. We are able to forget - if we ever knew - what happened two hundred years ago, one hundred years ago, fifty years ago, ten years ago. Worse, we are able to forget what happened one year ago, last month, last week, and even yesterday. We forget, we ignore, we refuse to know, and in our deliberate ignorance are found the seeds of further destruction, widely sown and also to be forgotten.

It has been made far too clear that our national amnesia certainly extends over the last two years. After an era of Republican rule that saw vast economic collapse, the abrogation of basic rights, the trashing of Constitutional law, two decade-long wars that still have no end in sight, a catastrophic terrorist attack that could have been prevented, the virtual annihilation of a major American city that could have been prevented, and the theft and waste of trillions of dollars, every available poll appears to indicate that the American people have already forgotten all about it, and are perfectly ready to let the wolves back inside the fence.

For proof, if proof is even required, I offer an article from Friday's New York Times:

It has been going on there for nine years and counting. Nearly 100,000 American troops are currently deployed there. More than 1,300 American service members have lost their lives there. The United States has spent over $300 billion on the effort so far. Yet polling suggests that the war in Afghanistan is barely a blip on voters' radars as the midterm elections approach.

In a nationwide New York Times/CBS News poll conducted last month, 60 percent of Americans said that the economy or jobs were the most important problems facing the country. A mere 3 percent mentioned Afghanistan or the war.

(Emphasis added)


Three percent mentioned as important a war that has been grinding out death and calamity for more than nine years. Three percent. The war in Afghanistan is all but forgotten.

The dying, however, continues apace.

From the eighth of October through the fifteenth of October, a Friday through a Friday, 28 soldiers were killed in Afghanistan. Seventeen were killed in the last three days of that week. One was from the United Kingdom, one was from Poland, four were from Italy, twelve were from the United States, and the names of ten more have not been released at the time of this writing. The oldest of the dead was 34 years old, a Sergeant. The youngest was 19. Each and every one of them died from hostile fire - rocket, IED, mortar or small arms. For the week ending October 13th, 188 casualties - both the dead and the wounded - were officially reported. The total number of American soldiers killed as of the 15th stands as 1,334, and the total number of NATO fatalities stands at 2,161.

There is also this, a fact within facts:

The number of U.S. soldiers who have suffered amputations in Afghanistan has increased sharply over last year as more troops move into Taliban territory, according to Army data.

Amputations rose from 47 in 2009 to 77 through Sept. 23 of this year, or an increase of more than 60%, the Army reports. The chief cause of the injuries are improvised explosive devices - or IEDs - that are planted in the ground or along roads, according to the International Security Assistance Force, which oversees military operations in Afghanistan.

Coalition forces have been hit by more IEDs in recent weeks as the surge in U.S. troops allows for expanded operations into traditional Taliban strongholds in Kandahar and Helmand provinces in southern Afghanistan.

The vast majority of amputations involve the loss of either an arm or leg, but a dozen soldiers this year have had multiple amputations, twice the number of such cases in 2009. At the NATO hospital, doctors amputated a major limb - a leg or arm - an average of once every other day in September, according to Navy Capt. Michael Mullins, a hospital spokesman. The operations included not only U.S. troops, but also NATO troops, Afghan soldiers and civilians, Mullins said.


Coverage of civilian casualties in Afghanistan is spotty at best - the "We don't do body counts" ethic continues apace - but the Predator drones have been hard at work, along with the rest of our fearful conventional arsenal, and the number of civilian dead and wounded stands tall in the thousands.

Argue against the war, or for it. Say we must withdraw, or that we must "finish the job," whatever that means. It would be nice if such a debate were actually taking place, because the debate is sorely needed. But we are incapable of even beginning to begin such a conversation. People are not disagreeing about the war. They are not even thinking about it, by a count of 97 to 3 percent.

The media is to blame for this. The politicians are to blame for this. The economy is to blame for this.

We are to blame for this.

It is amazing, astonishing, appalling, horrifying the way we forget.

http://www.truth-out.org/the-way-we-forget64242
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. We haven't forgotten - we've been silenced by
the Dems taking over the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. +1. Yes, it's not "forgetting". We've been told to STFU and stop criticizing.
Center-right propaganda to beat the far right propaganda has trumped real issues like ended the war, real health care reform, media reform, ending DADT, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is It Forgetting, Or Giving Up in the Face of Official Indifference to Our Demands?
Petition the government all you want--nothing will change.

Corporate fascism has an iron grip on the controls, and nothing short of a second revolution will break the thrall our Masters hold on events.

How many people marched to prevent the Iraqi invasion, and how much effect did that have? How much press coverage, even? How many politicians joined the march?

But let a dozen teabaggers gather, and the Press and the panderers are there with reinforcements and large checks.

All we need are the Brown Shirts, and we'll have a deja vu experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Well they say the brown shirts were actually psychotic
So they're half way there already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. there's something happening in Afghanistan
Edited on Sun Oct-17-10 10:20 AM by bigtree
I'm probably reading too much into these developments, but I think they're worth noting.

First is the replacement of outgoing NSA Jim Jones with Tom Donilon, who served under both President Carter and Clinton. From the NYT: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/08/donilon-to-replace-jones-as-national-security-adviser

"As deputy national security adviser, Donilon has urged what he calls a “re-balancing” of American foreign policy to rapidly disengage American forces in Iraq and to focus more on China, Iran and other emerging challenges. In the Afghanistan-Pakistan review, he argued that the United States could not engage in what he termed “endless war,” and has strongly defended Mr. Obama’s decision to declare that troops will begin leaving Afghanistan next summer."

The appointment either confirms, or, at the least, can serve to facilitate the drawdown of the escalated U.S. forces in Afghanistan the President promised - advantages it politically, anyway.

Also, there are many reports coming from Afghanistan that there are 'negotiations' with the Taliban which NATO is either allowing or facilitating.

Indeed, the report from Pakistan today that a top Taliban leader has been freed (http://www.presstv.ir/detail/147063.html) certainly points to some movement toward the ultimate political solution the President has said he believes is the inevitable outcome of all of the militarism he's allowed to increase. Even the military is sounding out tomes of 'progress' and 'success' in whatever they claimed to be doing with our forces there.

As in Iraq, any end game to the U.S. domination of the military operation in Afghanistan will be arbitrary and completely the invention of whoever ends it. If the President says we won something or other, or were successful at something or the other in Afghanistan, enough to bring our troops home, out they will come. That's why there's some cause for optimism that the President isn't really wedded to the notion of a perpetual conflict and indefinite U.S. dominance of any military effort there. He's said as much in the past and it makes sense to look for that point where he's ready to step off.

To the point of your article Will (I hope), I think the public would go along with declaring 'victory' and pulling back from Afghanistan. I don't think the public's indifference implies support, necessarily, just a war-weary apathy that they really have no lever to change the equation of our involvement. We thought we might have had one in electing this Democratic President (wishful thinking, mostly, unsupported by Mr. Obama's rhetoric).

I'm still hoping there's a devious plan in the works to say, 'We've tried this (escalation) and gone as far as we could or should'. I think most Americans could readily accept that. Until then . . .

(recommended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. When Pres. Obama "bought" this war....
he guaranteed that the Repubs will have a talking (screaming) point.... "Obama LOST Afghanistan". They're warming up that meme in the wings right now, ready to deploy the day the US leaves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. well,
Edited on Sun Oct-17-10 10:19 AM by bigtree
. . . that's why he attempted to insulate himself with Bush's military leaders. Those republican-friendly associations (Gates, Petraeus) with his military policy may end up working for him, politically.

All I can say is, what a tragic waste of lives and resources for such a dubious, politically-oriented strategy.

(sorry to go on and on in your excellent thread, Will.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. you mean we forget this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNEcQS4tXgQ

"memories may be beautiful, and yet
what's too painful to remember
we simply choose to forget
so it's the laughter
we will remember
whenever we remember
the way we were."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Heh
Haven't seen that angry banana pic in a long, long time.

Great to see you, old friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. I haven't forgotten, but don't have a clue what to do about it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. KandR
peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. Without consciousness, there is no self-determination
We are acting like bunch of mindless robots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. "What's too painful to remember, we simply choose to forget" -- Alan & Marilyn Bergman
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 06:28 PM by David Zephyr
Alan and Marilyn Bergman's powerful lyrics to "The Way We Were" are true to the "we" of twosomes to the collective "we" of millions.

We choose to forget because it can be too painful, to much of "an incovnenient truth" as Al Gore might say.

William Rivers Pitt, the above is my kinder explanation as to why we choose to forget, but there is also a darker reason, too. What is it? Sadly, I think that there is a little bit of Barbara Bush inside that collective "we".

Hear Mrs. Bush own words: "Why should we hear about body bags and deaths. Oh, I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC