Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rape Accusation Against Meg Whitman's Son That Got Hushed Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RandySF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 11:36 AM
Original message
The Rape Accusation Against Meg Whitman's Son That Got Hushed Up
http://gawker.com/5669754/the-rape-accusation-against-meg-whitmans-son-that-got-hushed-up?skyline=true&s=i

As a student at Princeton University, the son of California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman—one of the school's most celebrated donors—was accused of sexually assaulting a classmate. This is the story of the explosive accusation and its quiet aftermath.

Griffith Rutherford Harsh V was never arrested or charged with a crime in connection with the incident. Princeton dealt with it quietly and internally, ultimately allowing Harsh to continue his education. He graduated with the class of 2009, three years after his rape accusation—and two years after the inauguration of Whitman College, the residential living complex his billionaire mother donated $30 million to help build. The donation was announced in 2002, the year before Griff matriculated.

The Accusation

On a spring night in 2006, Griff—then a sophomore—went partying on the Street, a boozy row of private undergraduate dining clubs. As he would later tell a panel of university disciplinarians, he ran into a classmate and went home with her. They had sex. She awoke the next morning with a black eye, bruised face and, she told friends, no memories from the previous night. According to multiple sources—one of whom was a dormitory adviser at the time—the girl told her friends Griff Harsh had raped her.

A friend who spent time with her the following morning spoke to us under the condition of anonymity: "She woke up with him on top of her, and he was like, 'You need the morning-after pill.' And she was like, 'Why, what happened?' She didn't remember having sex, she didn't remember consenting, she didn't remember any of it.

"She had clearly hurt herself badly. Or been hurt badly."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. A small sacrifice for a co-ed to make
in order to elicit a magnificent payoff for her university.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Re-read the article. The donation was 4 years before the incident.
In any event, I'm not at all surprised that this didn't get pursued. If the evidence was as described, there would be absolutely no way to bring it to trial. All a competent defense attorney would have to do is suggest that at some point while she was drunk she tripped and hit her face on something. If she doesn't actually remember what happened, she'd be taken apart on cross examination. People here may not like it, but it's the realities of evidence in criminal investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You need to re-read it
it was a year AFTER the fact...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. 2006 is after 2002.
"The donation was announced in 2002, the year before Griff matriculated."

"On a spring night in 2006, Griff—then a sophomore—went partying on the Street"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. OK, you're right. I revise my comment.
It was perhaps in gratitude for the magnanimous gift that the case wasn't pursued. A little thing like that in your family background can also subtly influence your GPA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'm sure it couldn't have been pursued no matter what the circumstances.
Assuming that the situation was as the article described, any decent defense lawyer would have had that thrown out of court within minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You'd be surprised at the things I've seen successfully prosecuted.
And in several sex offense cases, previous dropped charges and Not Guilty verdicts were considered as offenses for purposes of risk assessment and sentencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. And while he was on top of her she punched herself in the eye and face?
Edited on Sun Oct-24-10 11:46 AM by lunatica
I find Meg Whitman and her son to be disgusting. Her snippy and blunt utterances rub me totally the wrong way. She has the vocal mannerisms of someone who is a verbal bully when she says she approves the ad in her ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dark forest Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unfortunately,
this type of thing happens way too often.

Society won't protect you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. The law is only for us "little people".
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Makes you almost sorry Whitman's gonna get stomped in this election
I have a feeling there's a lot more skeletons in her closet and having her in office would be a gold mine of revelations of bad behavior, sleazy payoffs, and borderline criminality.

While I would love to see this skank humiliated we've been through seven years of this "running Kuhleefornia like a business" crap and we can't afford even another year of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. news is calling this story an 'october surprise', Her 2nd one - the nanny story being the first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Somebody Up There doesn't like Meg.
Instructions have been issued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ahhh, arrest him despite there being no evidence
On the word of an unnamed source with no evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
This needs to be common knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting that she needed pave the way with
$30,000,000 before "Griffith Rutherford Harsh V" was enrolled. Perhaps he has a history of bad behaviour?

Hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. seems like she should have gone directly to the cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezmerelda39 Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. It is Rare....
That someone who is qualified to do the job will run for office. Being qualified has nothing to do with being a Senator or Representative. All it really takes these days is big, very, very big Bags of Money. The bigger the bags, the better your chance of winning. You can buy your way into anything as well as buy your way out of anything. (What's Meg's son up to these days?) You don't even need a platform to run on, just enough money to keep the secrets locked up and enough money to discredit anyone running against you. Lying is acceptable and is the norm rather than the exception. We like the lying and we LIKE big money, we admire big money and we wish we had it so we vote for those who do have it thinking that maybe we, too, will also someday have it. Otherwise why would we allow this topsy-turn system to continue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC