|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:16 PM Original message |
I think a lot of people have forgotten the context of the Hill/Thomas hearings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mira (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes. And we have had 19 damn years of proof n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think his sexist shenanigans disqualifies him for the position in and of itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mira (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. If we had true cojones in the Judicial Branch of Government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I agree, but the Senate then would not have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. He almost lost the nomination. He got it because many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I think many of them swallowed the story that Danforth, the Episcopalian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. I bet Ginny is really, really sorry she made that call to Prof. Hill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. I remember |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. Before Professor Hill even showed up, he was not doing well in the hearings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I watched the whole thing, too. It was riveting. We all got to see what happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Was very gratified that the Republican Senator from IL lost his seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You're right. She helped to define workplace harassment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Hadn't thought much about Roe v Wade, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. The repukes were also still pissed about Bork |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. Indeed - he got the lowest non-recommendation that the ABA ever gave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
16. There are two problems with your OP...first, , the ONLY reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 10:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. He was promoted as a black man of character, which of course he was not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC