Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Graphic anti-abortion ads air on Washington stations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 06:25 AM
Original message
Graphic anti-abortion ads air on Washington stations
By Dugald McConnell and Brian Todd, CNN
October 26, 2010 1:59 a.m. EDT

CNN) -- A disturbingly graphic political ad is airing on local stations in Washington this week -- and stations are telling viewers there's nothing they can do to prevent it.
The ad, calling for an end to abortion, apparently shows bloody and dismembered fetuses, and has been airing over the past few days in the nation's capital, including during afternoon and early-evening time slots, when children are likely to be watching.

But according to spokespersons for several of the broadcasters, they are required by law to carry the ads unaltered.

The two ads are paid for by the campaign of Missy Reilly Smith, the long shot Republican candidate from the heavily Democratic District of Columbia. She is running for the post of nonvoting Congressional representative, which is currently held by Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton.

Smith makes no apologies for the disturbing images in the ads, comparing them to the photos of Nazi concentration camps that forced the world to realize an awful truth.


http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/10/26/anti.abortion.ads/index.html?hpt=T2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was confused, but this is the bit that explains:

Federal communications law requires local stations to carry any and all ads by qualified federal candidates, to make sure no broadcaster has the power to oppose or censor any candidates by limiting their access to the airwaves. According to the Federal Communications Commission, broadcasters can only reject a federal candidate's ad if it contains a copyright infringement, or is defamatory.

"Legitimate candidate? They've gotta run the ad," said Howard Kurtz, host of CNN's "Reliable Sources."


But here's the bit that really explains it:

The ads were written and produced by her campaign manager, Randall Terry -- a vocal anti-abortion activist who founded Operation Rescue.


As the CNN consultant quoted in the article wonders: are the ads about the candidate's campaign, or is the campaign about the ads?

If they had not been placed by a candidate, the station could (and apparently defintely would) have rejected them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC